Started By
Message
re: The SEC made an interesting statement in its filings against LSU
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:30 pm to SidewalkTiger
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:30 pm to SidewalkTiger
ITS MOOT
0
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:30 pm to BrerTiger
quote:
Riding elephant dick is a poor way to sail.
The flagship would never.
This isn't about riding elephant dick. It's about the facts of the matter. They're completely different situations.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:31 pm to BoarEd
quote:
These retards are incapable of understanding how when Lane Kiffin recruited people to sue the NCAA that he personally fricked up. LSU is not done paying for his frick up either. It won't matter how many whataboutisms you throw at the wall, none of them will stick. LSU will be hit with LoIC. The melt will be one for the record books.
I think you are leaving out the part that ESPN and the public want to see LSU/Kiffin play these teams on a weekly basis. Suspending Kiffin hurts the league and ESPN. If you are going to suspend a guy you had better be able to define a “Pro Player”.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:31 pm to Boom33
quote:
He was a former Alabama player.
Like I said, I think it's far more likely that Alabama was involved in that situation than LSU was involved in this one.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:32 pm to Boom33
quote:
your attention seeking coach pretty much admitted to what LSU was doing in his interviews, then LSU tried to act like nobody could stop them while mocking the system itself while also trying to create new standards for the entire SEC via the court system.
Did Ole Miss do all that?
No. They didn't have to. They were treated fairly and the conference respected the court"s actions.
But, what Ole Miss did do is have a head coach threaten to burn down college football if anyone came after him or the school. He also basically admitted to the cheating in his statement.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:32 pm to BoarEd
quote:
This isn't about riding elephant dick. It's about the facts of the matter. They're completely different situations.
How so? Leaving your assumptions out of it.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:34 pm to SidewalkTiger
BoredED is a clueless fricktard. He has no response to legitimate questions.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:38 pm to koreandawg
quote:
The SEC finally took matters into its own hands. You wanted to break the NCAA rules.
Alabama actually did break the rules and put the player on the court for 5 games. Nothing happened to them. Neither the NCAA or SEC ever penalized them in any way.
LSU got virtually the same legal shield they did.
I get that the SEC decided to finally bone up and go nuclear. How convenient they showed little backbone when the school in their own backyard did some wild shite not even a year ago.
Longstanding rules, my arse.
It would actually be fun to see this get litigated so the SEC would have to defend how their completely toothless reaction to the Bediako situation while threatening the nuclear option with LSU.
I have a hunch today's continuance turns into this never getting to a courtroom. They don't want that mess playing out in a courtroom. The nuclear option worked as a deterrent and that's all anyone has really learned from this.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:40 pm to SidewalkTiger
"Regardless of the legal enforceability of that agreement."
... and now we know why the NCAA is constantly losing these lawsuits.
We will enforce OUR rules, the law be damned.
... and now we know why the NCAA is constantly losing these lawsuits.
We will enforce OUR rules, the law be damned.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:47 pm to BrerTiger
quote:
It would actually be fun to see this get litigated so the SEC would have to defend how their completely toothless reaction to the Bediako situation while threatening the nuclear option with LSU.
It's pretty interesting that they let Bediako play for 5 games while only managing an affidavit as a response.
Yet, LSU was sued and threatened with expulsion, before even rostering a single player. Not only was the response different, BUT the SEC ALSO went completely nuclear at the possibility of LSU just rostering the players, much less playing them.
If this is the case where the SEC decided to end it once and for all, what keeps them from simply creating their new rule, stating the penalties, and then penalizing LSU if they break the rule? Those were very stiff penalties, and then there was the possibility of the CFP committee getting involved as well. I don't believe LSU rosters the players at that point.
The fact that SEC immediately sued and then jumped to expulsion talk, before the rule was even broken, makes me believe they aren't very confident that any of this would stand under actual scrutiny.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:54 pm to BoarEd
I do think Boared could be correct. I don't think LSU is out of the woods on potential penalties.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:56 pm to LVag1997
quote:
I do think Boared could be correct. I don't think LSU is out of the woods on potential penalties.
I agree with both of you, though not by merit of actual guilt. This conference desperately wants to punish LSU for something, although it isn't exactly clear what.
The question is whether LSU accepts penalties for seemingly violating no rules, or calls the SEC's bluff and forces them to expel the Tigers.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:05 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Like I said, I think it's far more likely that Alabama was involved in that situation than LSU was involved in this one.
You mean like when they put in a request to the NCAA for eligibility before he filed?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News