Started By
Message

re: The real problem- I sat through the entire hearing yesterday

Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:50 am to
Posted by klrstix
Shreveport, LA
Member since Oct 2006
3670 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Any level headed judge can see that.


I think Sankey sees that and is the reason he balked at answering some of the questions...

Maybe I'm giving Sankey too much credit..

Posted by Trojan15
Ville Platte
Member since Oct 2006
472 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:58 am to
What is frustrating is the perception that LSU won the battle. LSU did not win anything. LSU was not the plaintiff in the lawsuit. The players won. If the players decide to go to another team instead of LSU, then what did LSU really win. The only reason LSU is in this position is because the fallout from hiring Lane Kiffin.
Posted by John Casey
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2016
4394 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:02 am to
quote:

But none of them withdrew either.


You can’t withdraw from the draft if you are out of eligibility.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 10:03 am
Posted by DeplorableTerrorizer
Member since Nov 2025
408 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:06 am to
Yes you can. Not having eligibility does not stop you from telling the NFL no thanks.

It might be dumb to do it. And give you no other options to play, but thats how the sec wrote their idiot rule so here we are
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9786 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:06 am to
The question should not be professional vs amateur.


The separation college football and basketball needs is simply an agreed upon, consistent line between college and the NFL/NBA.


Who really cares about pro or not after NIL?

What will continually diminish college sports is it just seeming increasingly like another minor league such as the G League.

Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
13375 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Who really cares about pro or not after NIL?


Judges who want to muddy the waters.
Posted by John Casey
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2016
4394 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Yes you can. Not having eligibility does not stop you from telling the NFL no thanks.


Pretty sure that you can’t.

If you’re a player with no eligibility remaining, you can tell them no thanks all that you want, but they can still draft you.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
21649 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:21 am to
quote:

This is exactly why the SEC got their arse handed to them yesterday.


I am blown away at the how many LSU fans are clueless as to what Lane has walked your university into. You guys are orgasmic that Sankey couldn’t provide the league definition of a professional athlete. In reality you should be on your knees thanking him that he didn’t do something that stupid.

Let’s pretend Sankey is dumb enough to testify yesterday that a professional athlete is someone who signs a contract for compensation in exchange for their services. Pretty good cut and dry definition until you realize he’s just created a legal exhibit on record in a court of law that every single athlete in this conference can now run to court with. You guys do realize where this leads right? There are no shortages of lawyers out there who would love to challenge the employment status of tens of thousands of student athletes in the richest conference in the land.

Lane/LSU currently have the conference and CFB out behind the barn ready to give it the Ol Yeller treatment and you morons are celebrating like drunken coon asses because Sankey had better sense not to pull the trigger.

Posted by DeplorableTerrorizer
Member since Nov 2025
408 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:28 am to
There is a formal withdrawal process
Posted by John Casey
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2016
4394 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:44 am to
quote:

There is a formal withdrawal process


For underclassmen and for players with eligibility remaining.

I can’t find anything on an opt out process for players with no eligibility remaining.

Otherwise, you’d have players opting out to try and bypass the draft to have opportunity to sign with whatever team they want.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
32572 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:45 am to
quote:

They couldn't define amateur


Seems pretty easy to define it.

Never a professional athlete...
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 11:01 am
Posted by LSUtigerNVegas9
Member since Nov 2025
335 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:46 am to
That why Sankey will be fired over this.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
53107 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Blizzard of Chizz




You’re too dense to realize that’s exactly what they wanted. To show that the professional vs. amateur stance the SEC is trying to take is a farce.
Posted by DeplorableTerrorizer
Member since Nov 2025
408 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:46 am to
If you remove yourself from the draft your not an udfa. Your not eligible to join a team. You go sell insurance or something
Posted by John Casey
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2016
4394 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

If you remove yourself from the draft your not an udfa. Your not eligible to join a team. You go sell insurance or something


Not being combative and genuinely curious.

Where is this information found in the NFL CBA or NFL by-laws?

All I can find is that if you are a player with no eligibility remaining, you are automatically in the draft pool and there is no opt out process. Your only option is to tell pro teams that you are retiring and will not sign if drafted.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
32572 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:02 am to
We really need to stop calling them student athletes at this point.
Posted by DeplorableTerrorizer
Member since Nov 2025
408 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:05 am to
I am not sure of the exact rule. But if underclassmen can submit a form, id imagine a senior can submit the same documents and say Im out dont consider me
Posted by UnsureTiger
Member since Apr 2023
169 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Unsure,

I heard Tony crossed Sankey with the Chambliss situation. Did he ask him why a 5th year player who made $190 is ineligible, but a 6th year player making $5 million is eligible? How did that line of questioning play out?


Yes this was brought up by Tony Clayton. Sankey said that the Chambliss situation is different because he had a medical issue. Sankey said that he was not able to discuss the medical issue, but that is the reason that his situation is different.
Posted by LSUtigerNVegas9
Member since Nov 2025
335 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:18 am to
The NCAA and SEC don’t get to have their cake and eat it too anymore. They know times are changing. They want antitrust exemptions with no CBA. They’re not going to get it.

They either decide the courts make the rules or call them employees and negotiate with the players for your rules.

Lane knows that. And he’s going to push it until it goes one way or the other. Either way there’s no more selective enforcement which absolutely KILLS the powers that be!

ALL ABOARD!!! The lane train is coming through!

I’ll add he knows the built in advantages USC and Alabama received. And short of it becoming public with a paper trail, if you’re the chosen ones you could do it.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 11:21 am
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
27834 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Declared for the NFL, NBA, or WNBA draft without properly withdrawing.
wouldn't apply. They didn't have to declare. They were out of eligibility.

quote:

Signed a contract with an NFL, professional football league, NBA, NBA G-League, or WNBA team and their affiliates.
this is vague. Would apply to wright but could also apply to Hutson.

quote:

Been listed on an active roster for any of these professional leagues

This is also vague.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 11:21 am
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter