Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/14/10 at 5:53 pm to BAMAFNZ
dude is a very well-respected poster....
Posted on 11/14/10 at 5:54 pm to The Egg
W&L doesn't post much, but when he does it happens. Closest thing to a lock you can get on a message board.
This post was edited on 11/14/10 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 11/14/10 at 5:55 pm to RollTide1987
Sounds more like a vindictive Bama fan. But I sure hope he is legit.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 5:55 pm to NashvilleTider
All of the good inside guys on bol are saying the same thing. Either AU is done, or they all are hearing the same false rumor. We'll see.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 5:56 pm to RollTide1987
the post is all speculation about repercussions, with nothing really discussed about what auburn allegedly did to deserve all of that
Posted on 11/14/10 at 5:57 pm to NashvilleTider
IF his post proves true I may have to buy a sub to BOL. If it is true he has better sources then any of the reporters covering this story.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:01 pm to RollTide1987
that's a lot of fire and brimstone in that post
but other than the FBI has goods and it's bad as hell for Auburn I'm missing the specifics
but other than the FBI has goods and it's bad as hell for Auburn I'm missing the specifics
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:01 pm to crimsonsaint
For the first time in more than a few months, I get actual info from BOL 
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:02 pm to BamaFan5833
Good Lord. I don't even post on BOL and I have even heard about W&L and how credible he is 
I wonder if he is right this time
I wonder if he is right this time
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:02 pm to BamaFan5833
This being true wouldn't surprise me. There were rumors of every aspect of this media frenzy days and even weeks prior to them being released in the media.
The Bond version, the Bell involvment, the voicemails/tapes, the meeting.
Everything was stated well before its release by the media, and i have yet to see one not be close to what the rumors stated, so this wouldn't shock me.
The Bond version, the Bell involvment, the voicemails/tapes, the meeting.
Everything was stated well before its release by the media, and i have yet to see one not be close to what the rumors stated, so this wouldn't shock me.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:03 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:That is W&L's MO. He hardly ever posts unless he has the facts. Take for instance a post in response to a bunch of BOL posters saying Cam wouldn't play.....
W&L doesn't post much, but when he does it happens. Closest thing to a lock you can get on a message board.
quote:
IMO Auburn will not suspend Cam because the NCAA wont tell them to. They will let auburn make the decision and then after the fact, hammer them for doing something "they should not have done" Right now All Auburn cares about is beating Bama, winning the SEC getting Cam the Heisman, playing and perhaps winning the MNC, and marketing the hell out of their success..and deal with the NCAA later.
And for those wondering why people thought Cam wouldn't play... it's because the president, the compliance dept and a couple of coaches all wanted to sit Cam. THAT is why so many people were sure Cam would sit. They knew what these guys were saying. HOWEVER, the AD, boosters and the rest of the coaches wanted to play him. It's clear the president and the compliance dept weren't being listened to.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:03 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
And finally, if leadership can be brought to the forefront, (and yes, this is the only prediction about which I cannot put forth what I consider strong evidence), you will be kicked out of the Southeastern Conference in a unanimous vote.
He thinks Barn is going to be kicked out of the SEC? I am not saying whoever this is right or wrong about any of this, because I surely have no sources or information. But I can't imagine in any scenario Auburn being kicked out of the conference.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:03 pm to WaveHog
quote:
the post is all speculation about repercussions, with nothing really discussed about what auburn allegedly did to deserve all of that
That kind of talk would mean they did more than intentionally play a player that will absolutely be declared ineligible...
This post was edited on 11/14/10 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:04 pm to LSUMafia
am i missing something?? what is he saying Auburn did to deserve all that? all he's saying is that they're in for hell... but not why, or exacty what they did. i'm more curious about the supposed violations than anything
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:07 pm to WaveHog
I don't read BOL so I don't know if he's credible or not. Still, looks like a solid post
Would anybody be shocked? Even mildly surprised? Pat Dye is a notorious cheater and is an important person in Auburn's athletics department. I liked the part about how they'd have to rename the field.
Sounds like he's saying if we fired Slive and hired less of a pussy Auburn would be kicked out. I would be shocked by that happening.
Would anybody be shocked? Even mildly surprised? Pat Dye is a notorious cheater and is an important person in Auburn's athletics department. I liked the part about how they'd have to rename the field.
Sounds like he's saying if we fired Slive and hired less of a pussy Auburn would be kicked out. I would be shocked by that happening.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:07 pm to WaveHog
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:07 pm to Clockwatcher68
quote:
That kind of talk would mean they did more than intentionally play a player that will absolutely be declared ineligible... Just going by the reputation and tone of the "insiders", I think it's gonna be paying for players in a non-isolated, organized way.
that's what i figured, but i guess i'm just more curious about what was going on backdoors.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:07 pm to GWfool
W&L is Belowpar!
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:07 pm to WaveHog
quote:
with nothing really discussed about what auburn allegedly did to deserve all of that
Bro, what do you think they did?
Page 2 of 76
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News