Started By
Message
re: "The issue is moot"
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:04 pm to TutHillTiger
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:04 pm to TutHillTiger
In order to get a settlement that large, those players will have to get on the stand and say under penalty of perjury that nobody associated with LSU contacted them about filing a lawsuit against the SEC/NCAA
You sure you want that?
You sure you want that?
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 2:05 pm
6
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:04 pm to Veritas
quote:
Moot Gang, mount up
It was a clear black night, a clear white moon
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:05 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Wouldn’t they be outside the current eligibility window next year?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:05 pm to BoarEd
Pay close attention to the last paragraph.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:05 pm to BoarEd
You might actually have the comprehension skills of a clinically retarded person
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:05 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
In order to get a settlement that large, those players will have to get on the stand and say under penalty of perjury that nobody associated with LSU contacted them about filing a lawsuit.
Well, what about the other teams contacting them? I say go for it
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:05 pm to LSUZombie
Sankey made them boys bend the knee and then mail begging not to punish them 
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:05 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:Yes.
You sure you want that?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:05 pm to LSUZombie
What does 00's era 4chan have to do with this?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:06 pm to Scruffy
quote:Since they didn’t play and aren’t in school they would still have a year of eligibility left technically
Wouldn’t they be outside the current eligibility window next year?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:06 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
In order to get a settlement that large, those players will have to get on the stand and say under penalty of perjury that nobody associated with LSU contacted them about filing a lawsuit against the SEC/NCAA
You sure you want that?
You know that isn't against the law right?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:06 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Seems like you are as familiar with the 5 for 5 rule as Sankey.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:07 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
That’s the problem so the issue isnt moot. They can still try and roster them next year
That's not how 5 for 5 works which this mess is all based on. 5 for 5 is 5 consecutive seasons of eligibility.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:07 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
The SEC will be counting on the Texas schools to pay the majority of 150 million or so to settle the players lawsuit
Aggies in if they can pay in Riyal
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:07 pm to TigerMonkey7
quote:
You might actually have the comprehension skills of a clinically retarded person
I also might frick your mother later on.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:07 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:It gives the SEC it’s “first hand account” of LSU contacting these players to file the lawsuits to bypass SEC rules. Which is seemingly what they lack right now in their federal case.
You know that isn't against the law right?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:07 pm to oleyeller
quote:
Sankey made them boys bend the knee and then mail begging not to punish them
Y'all do realize that you bend the rules just as much as anybody else, right?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:08 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:You know less about the 5 for 5 rule than Sankey.
Since they didn’t play and aren’t in school they would still have a year of eligibility left technically
It is 5 consecutive years.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:08 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
They don’t plan on rostering them “this season”
That’s the problem so the issue isnt moot. They can still try and roster them next year
Yep, we're going to find the Oxford judge to grant Whit Weeks a 6th year
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:09 pm to LSUZombie
Is it moot? Because LK really hurt Sankey's feelings with his halftime comment to Holly Rowe. LSU should definitely be kicked out of the conference for making Greg cry like a bitch.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News