Started By
Message
re: Texas A&M Catching Up
Posted on 7/6/18 at 8:26 pm to OldSchoolHorn
Posted on 7/6/18 at 8:26 pm to OldSchoolHorn
quote:
OldSchoolHorn
So angry.
1
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:00 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
I love how you try to paint us as poor while admitting that we are basically floating the whole thing with our disposable income.
You are completely misinformed, a substantial portion of your debt is backed by a 30-year hotel-motel tax, and a student fee.
Looks like aggy is fooling old brainwashed aggys who have thought since 1939 that "this is the year," and stealing from the taxpayer at government gunpoint.
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:06 pm to Smart Post
quote:
a substantial portion of your debt is backed by a 30-year hotel-motel tax, and a student fee.
Sounds like a pretty smart way of increasing our borrowing base at a time of historically low interest rates.
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:07 pm to Jack Daniel
quote:
Now show the statistics comparing Texas total national championships to Texas A&M’s.
Texas really doesn’t have that many. The gap wouldn’t be that wide, tbh.
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:09 pm to Sid E Walker
Eh, they have 45 NCAA titles. That is about four times as many as us.
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:12 pm to cardboardboxer
That's weird, we have four times as many football titles, too
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:13 pm to EKG
Yes, outraged Texas slums Nike for a quarter billion while A&M gets Adidas for $16M.
We coulda had a glow in the dark Bevo for a day game dammit. Oh, don’t forget to feed the pit bull.
We coulda had a glow in the dark Bevo for a day game dammit. Oh, don’t forget to feed the pit bull.
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:18 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
Eh, they have 45 NCAA titles. That is about four times as many as us.
There’s sports other than football?
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:24 pm to Smart Post
It’s not really that weird, it’s just a reflection of how Texas was a much bigger university for a long time.
What is weird is how few football national titles Texas has being the dominant Texas team all that time compared to programs Texas wants to see as equals such a Bama, OU, Notre Dame, and USC. Actually we shouldn’t be as close as we are either, we were basically the help fifty years ago.
As A&M moves into an SEC era when we can actually elevate our program to the national stage it is humbling to remember how Texas’s premiere program has basically failed to do that consistently over decades. Makes you wonder if there is something in the water or something.
What is weird is how few football national titles Texas has being the dominant Texas team all that time compared to programs Texas wants to see as equals such a Bama, OU, Notre Dame, and USC. Actually we shouldn’t be as close as we are either, we were basically the help fifty years ago.
As A&M moves into an SEC era when we can actually elevate our program to the national stage it is humbling to remember how Texas’s premiere program has basically failed to do that consistently over decades. Makes you wonder if there is something in the water or something.
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:26 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
It’s a very retro feeling after being around the actual dirt poor SEC to have someone tell us we are poor. Keep it up, nostalgia is in right now.
But Alabama’s not poor.
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:26 pm to Smart Post
quote:
Smart Post
Hi texashorn
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:27 pm to CapstoneGrad06
No Bama is not, but have you seen the shitty revenue numbers Mizzou was pulling in? Holy shite it’s like they are still making Big 12 TV money.
Plus we know of other tigers that are poor.
Plus we know of other tigers that are poor.
This post was edited on 7/6/18 at 9:28 pm
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:28 pm to cardboardboxer
Did Missouri have any increase from 2011 to now?
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:36 pm to OldSchoolHorn
Like I said ....
mad.
mad.
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:39 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Did Missouri have any increase from 2011 to now?
Page 2 of the article ....
quote:
Missouri hasn't seen the exact same revenue success as Texas A&M following its simultaneous move to the SEC -- outside of conference distributions, of course. The Tigers reported $64.1 million in revenue in 2011 and $97.8 million in 2017. Still more growth by percentage than Oklahoma and Oklahoma State, however. Oklahoma State's 2017 revenue was 10.9% more than its 2011 revenue, while Oklahoma's was 48.8% and Missouri's was 52.5%.
This post was edited on 7/6/18 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:41 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Yeah they are double 2011, but back in 2011 they were almost double Mississippi State. They got boat raced.
Posted on 7/6/18 at 9:44 pm to Tridentds
You ain’t won shite tho
Posted on 7/6/18 at 10:03 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
cardboardboxer
This is another one of those times when all of you texas douchebags sound like a bunch of texas douchebags regardless of the douchebag university you attend(ed).
Posted on 7/6/18 at 10:08 pm to Dallasgrowl
you are a little fish in Texas. must suck to be surrounded by Ags. Fetch me a beer son
Posted on 7/6/18 at 10:12 pm to texag7
quote:
texag7
Aw, a douchebag that has never seen a pussy. Even in Texas, children should be seen and not heard.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News