Started By
Message
re: Sumlin to USC, Morris to A&M (Who says no?)
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:47 pm to Hugh McElroy
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:47 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
historical success
know the best way to predict the future? Look at the past
3
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:48 pm to Bob Ag
quote:
Its funny watching the corn dogs trip over their dicks in here based on one comment.
Every fanbase is saying the same thing idiot!!!
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:48 pm to therick711
quote:
This isn't hard to understand, aggy.
Obviously it is.
quote:
Most people in this thread don't think USC is targeting him.
But they think they could give him if they wanted to. That is the disconnect.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:49 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
Chavis didn't think so.
Go on record, so I can laugh like crazy:
Which is a better HC job, LSU or A&M?
While I don't think there is a huge difference, 100 out of 100 college football analysts would say LSU.
A&M is a great program. But you guys are truly delusional if you think its anywhere near the level of a USC.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:49 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
Chavis didn't think so.
Chavis thought he was bigger than every other coach and didn't want to sign the proper legal documents.........i would have let him go as well......
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:49 pm to therick711
quote:
This isn't hard to understand, aggy. Most people in this thread don't think USC is targeting him.
They probably aren't targeting him. As has been widely reported, they already offered him the job once, and he already turned them down. They know they can't get him.
And that was before he hired Chavis.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:49 pm to Hugh McElroy
I don't know that we can debate things like better recruiting areas and who has more money. You're using terms that make sense to you, and that is fine, but I can't debate you on terms that I don't know what you mean by. In terms of facilities, you're dead on that USC is behind. The good news, they are in LA. The Hollywood glitz thing is what they used when they won 7 straight conference titles. Someone will figure that formula out again. Not sure who. As for now, enjoy them being down. I know I am.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:49 pm to cas4t
quote:
know the best way to predict the future? Look at the past
Yup. Minnesota is a top 15 job fellas, they will start dominating again any day now. They just need the right coach. The past says so.
This post was edited on 10/12/15 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:49 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
Recruiting hotbed? A&M
This is the only one I disagree with you on. I think Sumlin would absolutely kill it at USC and bring in top 3-5 classes every year. Again, he may not be an LA guy, but USC is a really good job, and not a lot of coaches would want to pass that up.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:50 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:well no shite. A&M is a trash job am I right or am I right
While I don't think there is a huge difference, 100 out of 100 college football analysts would say LSU
This post was edited on 10/12/15 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:50 pm to Dawgsontop34
Yeah, California just gets no recruits at all. No NFL talent there...
Jeez.
Jeez.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:50 pm to cas4t
quote:
quote:
historical success
know the best way to predict the future? Look at the past
Yes. That's how we knew that Cornell would always be a football giant.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:50 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
Except we are overpaying Sumlin BECAUSE of last time, which would require them to overpay Sumlin too.
Do yall really think Sumlin is worth Nick Saban money? Because that is what it would take.
You are overpaying Sumlin because Sherman recruited Johnny Manziel.
Personally, I don't think Sumlin is even worth $5million, but as tamu shows, even rich, powerful boosters make stupid decisions from time to time.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:51 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
Yup. Minnesota is a top 15 job fellas, they will start dominating again any day now. They just need the right coach. The past says so.
Minnesota was fielding winners back when . . . aggy was. I'm not sure that's the best example.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:51 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Which is a better HC job, LSU or A&M?
LSU is. It is a top 10 job nationally. It dominates a state full of talent, while A&M has to compete for talent.
Yall should be a better job than Bama honestly, but yall refuse to live up to your potential.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:52 pm to cas4t
quote:
quote:
historical success
know the best way to predict the future? Look at the past
Tennessee fans hope so
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:52 pm to fan251
quote:
Chavis thought he was bigger than every other coach and didn't want to sign the proper legal documents.........i would have let him go as well......
But yall didn't "let him go." Yall offered a raise that he turned down.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:52 pm to cardboardboxer
I see we're back to the Chavis well again.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:52 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Go on record, so I can laugh like crazy:
Which is a better HC job, LSU or A&M?
While I don't think there is a huge difference, 100 out of 100 college football analysts would say LSU.
A&M is a great program. But you guys are truly delusional if you think its anywhere near the level of a USC.
How do you define "best job"? LSU and USC are clearly better programs than A&M. Not even a question. 95% of the attractiveness of a college coaching job is money. I have no idea what LSU can offer (probably a ton) because you haven't had to look for a coach in a while so I can't really say. It's pretty clear what USC can offer, and it's less than us.
if you think coaches give that much of a frick about how the fans support the team or where they live you are delusional.
Posted on 10/12/15 at 4:52 pm to therick711
quote:
The Hollywood glitz thing is what they used when they won 7 straight conference titles. Someone will figure that formula out again.
If the NFL doesn't steal that thunder first.
USC dominated in the 00's because it was basically LA's NFL team. That magic will soon be lost.
Page 6 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News