
Started By
Message
re: So after all that, LSU rostered NOBODY against SEC rules
Posted on 10/20/26 at 1:57 pm to 3down10
Posted on 10/20/26 at 1:57 pm to 3down10
quote:
It's always been the rule that you can't have pro players. It was just passed down from the NCAA rule rather than being an extra unneeded rule. So when the NCAA lost the suit, the SEC clarified they still had the rule in place regardless of the NCAA case.
It's interesting that the conference picks and chooses which eligibility rules it wants to enforce.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 2:05 pm to 3down10
False that it has always been a rule that you can't have pro players in the SEC.
"No, the SEC and the NCAA have not always had a blanket rule that bars all professional players across sports like soccer, tennis, and track and field. In fact, college athletics eligibility has historically handled "olympic" and individual sports very differently from major revenue sports like football and basketball"
The idea of a strict, unyielding conference ban is a very recent development. In August 2026, the SEC (alongside the Big Ten and other Power Four conferences) passed an emergency, strict eligibility policy. This rules change was a specific, defensive response to a wave of legal rulings that allowed former college players who went to the NFL, NBA, or WNBA to try to return to college for a fifth year of eligibility.
However, even this strict rule was narrowly tailored: the SEC's August 2026 mandate explicitly targets football and basketball players who declared for the draft, signed contracts, or appeared on professional rosters (specifically the NFL, NBA, G-League, or WNBA)"
"No, the SEC and the NCAA have not always had a blanket rule that bars all professional players across sports like soccer, tennis, and track and field. In fact, college athletics eligibility has historically handled "olympic" and individual sports very differently from major revenue sports like football and basketball"
The idea of a strict, unyielding conference ban is a very recent development. In August 2026, the SEC (alongside the Big Ten and other Power Four conferences) passed an emergency, strict eligibility policy. This rules change was a specific, defensive response to a wave of legal rulings that allowed former college players who went to the NFL, NBA, or WNBA to try to return to college for a fifth year of eligibility.
However, even this strict rule was narrowly tailored: the SEC's August 2026 mandate explicitly targets football and basketball players who declared for the draft, signed contracts, or appeared on professional rosters (specifically the NFL, NBA, G-League, or WNBA)"
This post was edited on 10/20/26 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 10/20/26 at 2:12 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
It's interesting that the conference picks and chooses which eligibility rules it wants to enforce.
Or which legal decision they agree with.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 2:12 pm to 3down10
In the mean time Big10 completely razoo’d the SEC offices and their fluffers the gumps.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 2:22 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Or which legal decision they agree with.
Which is why they'll never be viewed as a responsible governing body by the courts.
They're selectively enforcing their own rules and creating other rules, when they feel like it.
And then suing a member institution to "gain" power that they already had in the first place. The lawsuit is completely pointless and accomplishes nothing.
No rules actually being broken makes it even worse.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 2:37 pm to PGJ
when did Georgia fan's become so pathetic. 1 loss to their rival and they think the world is crashing in on them by LSU still being in a conference that hates every member but Bama.
When Bama loses Sankey needs quiet time in the bathroom stall for 30 minutes. Wait maybe he does some other stuff in their too that is not a necessary body function but optional.
The glasses and the nerd look just does not work for our conference.
He is the idiot that created the 9 game conference schedule that could cost us playoff games.
When Bama loses Sankey needs quiet time in the bathroom stall for 30 minutes. Wait maybe he does some other stuff in their too that is not a necessary body function but optional.
The glasses and the nerd look just does not work for our conference.
He is the idiot that created the 9 game conference schedule that could cost us playoff games.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 2:37 pm to Pickle_Weasel
quote:
That's because LSU bent the knee and kissed Sankey's ring.
No, they didn’t. They told him to shove it
Posted on 10/20/26 at 2:42 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Then why are there a bunch of players with pro experience currently on rosters other than LSU's and it's no issue?
Again, this was done after the fact and only LSU's players were singled out. 70 lawsuits with over 400 athletes were made eligible. But, the two that LSU wanted were somehow different. It was bullshite then. It's bullshite now and it will always be bullshite no matter how anyone tries to spin it. Sankey got his arse handed to him in Louisiana court and now he is lashing out. He may actually be less mature than Kiffin.
Do you mean only in the SEC?
When it comes to basketball, I don't know. I don't watch that sport, I'm not familiar with it. I know it's a world wide sport, I have a friend who lives in Spain who loves the shite. I know they have a bunch of different leagues etc. So when you start getting into all these different things about G league or whatever, I don't know shite about it. Seems to me Alabama should have been punished for the basketball stuff last year.
As far as football and the stuff back in August goes, I just saw LSU backing the SEC into a corner and the lawsuit was the SEC's last resort. If LSU rosters those players, it would open the door for much more.
In the end, the best case for LSU seems to be pretending it never happened to begin with. They didn't get the pro players, and maybe they can get out without punishment etc.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 2:48 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
And then suing a member institution to "gain" power that they already had in the first place. The lawsuit is completely pointless and accomplishes nothing.
The key thing they want out of this is to entrench their power by the judge issuing what would amount to an advisory opinion (which is a no no) saying that, not only does the SEC have power to penalize and enforce, but the entity being enforced upon cannot pursue legal remedies. It's an asinine argument and, even if this federal judge issues such a proclamation (which again, she can't), will be struck down on appeal.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 2:50 pm to tigerskin
LSU is a bad member of the SEC. Kick them out.
Rodo
Rodo
Posted on 10/20/26 at 2:55 pm to 3down10
quote:
As far as football and the stuff back in August goes, I just saw LSU backing the SEC into a corner and the lawsuit was the SEC's last resort. If LSU rosters those players, it would open the door for much more.
If the lawsuit were the SEC's last resort, LSU would be playing pro players.
I realize you're amazed by it, but it didn't actually accomplish anything.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 3:06 pm to tigerskin
quote:
False that it has always been a rule that you can't have pro players in the SEC.
"No, the SEC and the NCAA have not always had a blanket rule that bars all professional players across sports like soccer, tennis, and track and field. In fact, college athletics eligibility has historically handled "olympic" and individual sports very differently from major revenue sports like football and basketball"
The idea of a strict, unyielding conference ban is a very recent development. In August 2026, the SEC (alongside the Big Ten and other Power Four conferences) passed an emergency, strict eligibility policy. This rules change was a specific, defensive response to a wave of legal rulings that allowed former college players who went to the NFL, NBA, or WNBA to try to return to college for a fifth year of eligibility.
However, even this strict rule was narrowly tailored: the SEC's August 2026 mandate explicitly targets football and basketball players who declared for the draft, signed contracts, or appeared on professional rosters (specifically the NFL, NBA, G-League, or WNBA)"
NCAA Bylaw 12.1.1
Amateur Status. An individual loses amateur status and thus shall not be eligible for intercollegiate competition in a particular sport if the individual:
(a) Uses his or her athletics skill (directly or indirectly) for pay in any form in that sport;
(b) Accepts a promise of pay even if such pay is to be received following completion of intercollegiate athletics participation;
(c) Signs a contract or commitment of any kind to play professional athletics, regardless of its legal enforceability or any consideration received;
(d) Receives, directly or indirectly, a salary, reimbursement of expenses or any other form of financial assistance from a professional sports organization based upon athletics skill or participation, except as permitted by NCAA rules and regulations;
(e) Competes on any professional athletics team (per Bylaw 12.02.4), even if no pay or remuneration for expenses was received;
(f) Subsequent to initial full-time collegiate enrollment, enters into a professional draft (see also Bylaw 12.2.4.2.1); or
(g) Enters into an agreement with an agent.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 3:08 pm to 3down10
quote:
As far as football and the stuff back in August goes, I just saw LSU backing the SEC into a corner and the lawsuit was the SEC's last resort.
LSU hadn't broken any rules. The SEC made up an arbitrary line and then tried to enforce it after the fact. What corner were they backing the SEC up into? There are players that were in camps that are on rosters in the SEC and it's not an issue.
quote:
If LSU rosters those players, it would open the door for much more.
Then why are the other players with pro experience being allowed to play? If it was really about competitive balance, then the indicators about what should and shouldn't be allowed should then go to how much experience a player gained in NFL camps. It should be based on reps and time on the field, not when a player signed a piece of paper.
The truth is that none of this was ever about competitive balance. It's a distraction from the incompetence of the NCAA and the SEC with how badly they fricked up the 5 for 5 rule. The SEC thought it was just going to strong arm people with ridiculous lawsuits. The Louisiana lawsuit exposed Sankey as an incompetent leader and now he is out for blood.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 3:11 pm to 3down10
quote:
NCAA Bylaw 12.1.1
Amateur Status.
Neither the NCAA lawyers nor the SEC lawyers have been able to define what what makes a player a professional or an amateur. They can't even define it themselves and they are trying to enforce it.

Popular
Back to top

1










