Started By
Message

re: Serious question/poll re: Bama's claimed NC

Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:20 pm to
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:20 pm to
The only one that could be disputed is 41. And I don't know why we claim that one. The others, it's quite safe to say, there was East Coast and Catholic bias against Southern schools and Bama more than proved their arguments by going undefeated and beating those teams in the Rose Bowl.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37264 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:24 pm to
I realise you barners don't have much experience with ncs, so maybe when the conversation turns to ncs, you should just stfu!
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

The only one that could be disputed is 41.


There really isn't a dispute, it's more along the lines of nobody thinks Alabama was the national champion that year.

quote:

The others, it's quite safe to say, there was East Coast and Catholic bias against Southern schools and Bama more than proved their arguments by going undefeated and beating those teams in the Rose Bowl.


I have real beef with a few other titles, but it's getting too late to argue this topic for the umpteenth time, so we can continue our discussion later.

(I will say that some of the titles, such as 1973, irk me because Alabama lost to the true national champion in their bowl game, but the UPI was still being primitive and awarding pre-bowl game national titles. However, I guess it counts, even though as a guy viewing from outside the box it looks wrong. At least that year caused the UPI to get their heads out of their asses and award after the bowl game.)
This post was edited on 12/4/09 at 10:31 pm
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:30 pm to
quote:


I realise you barners don't have much experience with ncs, so maybe when the conversation turns to ncs, you should just stfu!


Assuming we claimed national titles with more liberal views on what qualifies us for them, we could claim many more than 1957 and you can take that to the bank.

Go back and check out Auburn's 1983 season and tell me why we shouldn't claim it. We have several minor polls and in all honesty the resume beats the crap out of anything Miami or Nebraska had.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

I will say that some of the titles, such as 1973, irk me because Alabama lost to the true national title in their bowl game, but the UPI was still being primitive and awarding pre-bowl game national titles. However, I guess it counts, even though as a guy viewing from outside the box it looks wrong. At least that year caused the UPI to get their heads out of their asses and award after the bowl game


Busting Bama because of the way Championships were awarded is kinda dumb. It was awarded and that's the way it was recognized. That's about all there is to it.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:31 pm to
I said it's legitimate, doesn't mean the system was right. You blast me for bias, open your eyes.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:33 pm to
I'll give em 7. It's still a frickin awesome accomplishment. Unfortunately, the average bammer has no fcukin clue.

Most of the guys on the Bama rant are fine though
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:34 pm to
I saw. It was also said like this, if I were to say about your 83... yeah.. yall were awarded by some small little poll somewhere, even thought most of the country believed someone else was better, yeah, yall should be able to claim it.

Posted by bamaboy87
Member since Jan 2009
15164 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

bmy


Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

bamaboy87


you got tickets or anything? going to a bar or something? can't decide where i'm gonna watch.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:38 pm to
1941 is such a joke, but the sad fact that Bama claims this makes you wonder about most of the other 11.

IMO, any #1 ranking awarded retroactively should not count.
Posted by DvlsAdvocat
Your Mom's House, AL
Member since Jul 2007
24491 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:39 pm to
See, if I was an Auburn fan, I wouldn't claim 1983. Because the wire service standard had been established at that point. A single publication or group wouldn't bear the same weight as the AP or UPI.

But I'm also not going to go back now, in the BCS era, and mock championships awarded by the AP or UPI, because those WERE the standards used at the time. In fifteen years, we will have another standard to award the NC. Will LSU or Florida's BCS titles then be dismissed as being "irrelevant BCS garbage that nobody should claim"....?
This post was edited on 12/4/09 at 10:40 pm
Posted by bamaboy87
Member since Jan 2009
15164 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

you got tickets or anything? going to a bar or something? can't decide where i'm gonna watch.



Tickets? HA!

no I don't

Not going to a bar either. I'm gonna watch it at home that way if we lose I can take an "I don't give a shite" pill and go right to sleep. Or I'll ask that girl out finally and get it over with so Lee will stop giving me shite about doing it. So if i get rejected, I will already have the "I dont give a shite" pill in me and..well...i wont give a shite
This post was edited on 12/4/09 at 10:47 pm
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

Will LSU or Florida's BCS titles then be dismissed as being "irrelevant BCS garbage that nobody should claim"....?



The difference between now and the pre-BCS situation is that the polls awarded the #1 spot and different times, under varying methods (sports writers, individual statisticians, etc.)

Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

The difference between now and the pre-BCS situation is that the polls awarded the #1 spot and different times, under varying methods (sports writers, individual statisticians, etc.)


2003 USC - AP
Posted by DvlsAdvocat
Your Mom's House, AL
Member since Jul 2007
24491 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:45 pm to
Ahhh...but what if in the "new" system, polls are totally not incorporated? Then your "silly BCS titles" could be dismissed as being based on nothing more than a popularity contest that established who was going to have the best chance to get to the title game before the first kickoff of the season (a'la Auburn 2004)....
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:46 pm to
quote:


I saw. It was also said like this, if I were to say about your 83... yeah.. yall were awarded by some small little poll somewhere, even thought most of the country believed someone else was better, yeah, yall should be able to claim it.



The cool part about this is that outside of all our bitching, Auburn doesn't claim 1983 in any way, so you can belittle our non-national championship all you want. We just bitch about it because we had a tie for best record and had by far the toughest schedule. And we dominated the common opponents category with Miami.

At any rate, I gave Alabama due credit for 1973 while saying that the system was inherently flawed because Notre Dame didn't get the UPI poll. That's the truth.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
21699 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:48 pm to
Because you people bitch about this SO much, I'm no longer claiming 12. I'm claiming 25:

1


1925


10-0-0


Angelo Louisa

Bill Libby

Billingsley Report

Boand System

Century Football Index

Cliff Morgan

College Football Researchers Association

David Wilson

Harry Frye

Helms Athletic Foundation

Houlgate System

James Howell

Jim Koger

Mel Smith

National Championship Foundation

Nutshell Sports Football Ratings

Patrick Premo

Poling System

Ray Bryne

2


1926


9-0-1


1st-N-Goal

Billingsley Report

Century Football Index

College Football Researchers Association

Helms Athletic Foundation

James Howell

Mel Smith

National Championship Foundation

Nutshell Sports Football Ratings

Patrick Premo

Poling System

Ray Bryne

3


1930


10-0-0


Bob Kirlin

College Football Researchers Association

David Wilson

Mel Smith

Parke Davis

Ray Bryne

Sagarin Ratings

4


1934


10-0-0


1st-N-Goal

Bill Libby

Century Football Index

Cliff Morgan

Dunkel System

Houlgate System

James Howell

Mel Smith

Poling System

Ray Bryne

Williamson System

5


1936


8-0-1


Cliff Morgan

Mel Smith

Ray Bryne

6


1937


9-1-0


Ray Bryne

7


1941


9-2-0


Houlgate System

8


1945


10-0-0


Cliff Morgan

National Championship Foundation

Ray Bryne

9


1950


9-2-0


Bob Kirlin

10


1961


11-0-0


1st-N-Goal

Angelo Louisa

Associated Press

Bill Libby

Billingsley Report

Bob Royce

Century Football Index

Cliff Morgan

Clyde Berryman

College Football Researchers Association

College Football USA

David Wilson

Dunkel System

Earl Jessen

Edward Litkenhous

Football News

Harry DeVold

Harry Frye

Helms Athletic Foundation

James Howell

Jeff Self

Jim Koger

Massy Ratings

Mel Smith

Montgomery Full Season Championship

National Championship Foundation

National Football Foundation and Hall of Fame

Nutshell Sports Football Ratings

Patrick Premo

Sagarin Ratings

Soren Sorensen

The Fleming System

United Press International

Washington Touchdown Club

Williamson System

11


1962


10-1-0


Loren Maxwell

Montgomery Full Season Championship

12


1963


9-2-0


Jim Koger

13


1964


10-1-0


Angelo Louisa

Associated Press

Bob Royce

Clyde Berryman

College Football USA

Edward Litkenhous

Montgomery Full Season Championship

United Press International

Washington Touchdown Club

14


1965


9-1-1


1st-N-Goal

Associated Press

Bob Kirlin

Century Football Index

College Football Researchers Association

David Wilson

Football Writers Association of America

Jim Koger

Massy Ratings

National Championship Foundation

Patrick Premo

15


1966


11-0-0


ARGH Power Ratings

Cliff Morgan

Clyde Berryman

Earl Jessen

National Championship Foundation

Soren Sorensen

16


1973


11-1-0


Bob Royce

Clyde Berryman

Edward Litkenhous

United Press International

Washington Touchdown Club

17


1974


11-1-0


Washington Touchdown Club

18


1975


11-1-0


ARGH Power Ratings

Bob Kirlin

Matthews Grid Ratings

19


1977


11-1-0


Bob Kirlin

College Football Researchers Association

20


1978


11-1-0


1st-N-Goal

Annual Football Predictions

Associated Press

Century Football Index

College Football Researchers Association

David Wilson

Football Writers Association of America

Foundation for the Analysis of Competitions and Tournaments

Helms Athletic Foundation

National Championship Foundation

National Football Foundation and Hall of Fame

New York Daily News

Nutshell Sports Football Ratings

21


1979


12-0-0


ARGH Power Ratings

Annual Football Predictions

Associated Press

Billingsley Report

Bob Kirlin

Bob Royce

Century Football Index

Cliff Morgan

Clyde Berryman

College and Pro Football Newsweekly

David Wilson

Dunkel System

Football News

Football Writers Association of America

Foundation for the Analysis of Competitions and Tournaments

Harry DeVold

Harry Frye

Helms Athletic Foundation

James Howell

Jeff Self

Loren Maxwell

Massy Ratings

Matthews Grid Ratings

Mel Smith

Montgomery Full Season Championship

National Championship Foundation

National Football Foundation and Hall of Fame

New York Times

Nutshell Sports Football Ratings

Patrick Premo

Poling System

Sagarin Ratings

The Sporting News

United Press International

22


1980


10-2-0


Annual Football Predictions

Montgomery Full Season Championship

23


1991


11-1-0


Annual Football Predictions

24


1992


13-0-0


1st-N-Goal

Angelo Louisa

Annual Football Predictions

ARGH Power Ratings

Associated Press

Billingsley Report

Century Football Index

Clyde Berryman

College Football Researchers Association

David Wilson

DKC Ratings

Dunkel System

Football News

Football Writers Association of America

Foundation for the Analysis of Competitions and Tournaments

Gupta Power Ratings

Harry DeVold

Harry Frye

James Howell

James Whalen

Jeff Self

Massy Ratings

Matthews Grid Ratings

National Championship Foundation

New York Times

Nutshell Sports Football Ratings

Patrick Premo

Peter Wolfe

Quality Champions

Soren Sorensen

Sparks Achievement Ratings

Sports Illustrated

Steve Eck

SW!-TECH Computer Ratings

The College Football Statistics Quarterly

The Fleming System

The Sporting News

United Press International/National Football Foundation

USA Today/CNN

Washington Touchdown Club

25


1994


12-1-0


Annual Football Predictions

Championship Years



So frick all y'all.
This post was edited on 12/4/09 at 10:48 pm
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

Ahhh...but what if in the "new" system, polls are totally not incorporated? Then your "silly BCS titles" could be dismissed as being based on nothing more than a popularity contest that established who was going to have the best chance to get to the title game before the first kickoff of the season (a'la Auburn 2004)....


But they were/are consistent in using the same formula for voting the national championship: After all the bowl games and recognized by the conferences of the FBS.

Even if the end results are not the same (i.e. 2003 or any difference in computer vs. human polls) these "rules" have been accepted and approved by all 119 schools in the FBS.

I'm sure the Helms Athletic Foundation was recognized and approved by all conferences...
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

2003 USC - AP


The timing and the method of voting was/is recognized by all.

USC didn't win the 2003 AP trophy in 2008.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter