Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:44 pm to Jake81
Oklahoma Fan
Member since Jul 2021
15 posts
Member since Jul 2021
15 posts
quote:
So sick of everyone trying to join our conference!
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:44 pm to ShowMeHorns
2x post
This post was edited on 8/2/21 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:52 pm to BreakawayZou83
Should have been UCF and west VA from the get go now get ready to watch Texas destroy the sec
Posted on 8/2/21 at 8:05 pm to UCF_BLUEBLOODS
quote:
Should have been UCF and west VA from the get go now get ready to watch Texas destroy the sec
Yeah, who doesn't want those two prestigious institutions..
Posted on 8/2/21 at 9:17 pm to FootsFanatic
quote:
OU is only team that won't be fighting for a .500 SEC record every year. And I am not sure OU won't end up being a .500 in conference SEC team until they learn that defense does heavily influence
Our defense last year was good. Will be very good this year. The stigma is still there but not for long. We’ll go no worse than 10-2 on average. Talking shite on a message board is one thing but when your team is about to play OU you will be nervous. Texas…not so much.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 9:23 pm to 8
Do we really want these guys in our conference?
Posted on 8/2/21 at 10:08 pm to viceman
Posted on 8/2/21 at 11:02 pm to IotaTiger
quote:
But adding those 2 markets may actually exceed.financially what Tx/ Ok brought , meaning 2 new massive markets- actual new eyeball.
Laughable to think either bring more "eyeballs" than OU.Do people really think more people across thé country Will watch UVA or UNC over OU or UT FB ? Folks need To think way burger than local markets
Posted on 8/2/21 at 11:40 pm to Iron Balls McGinty
Lol
Posted on 8/2/21 at 11:48 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Neither team can afford to give up ALL of their TV money until 2036. Clemson and FSU aren't going anywhere (and neither is any other ACC team...)
Doesn't ESPN already have the ACC locked in with their GOR? Doesn't make sense for them to move to the SEC where ESPN would have to give them a better deal..
Posted on 8/3/21 at 8:20 am to Jake81
quote:
Over UNC??
EweNC is not an SEC school at all, far less so than even Missouri culture-wise.
Posted on 8/3/21 at 8:24 am to ATW
quote:
OU is only team that won't be fighting for a .500 SEC record every year. And I am not sure OU won't end up being a .500 in conference SEC team until they learn that defense does heavily influence
I love SEC fans and media setting the bar here.
If OU goes 6-3 first few seasons you will literally have to admit SEC is not as good as you thought it was
Posted on 8/3/21 at 8:35 am to BigBro
quote:
Here is the problem with future expansion..
Each SEC school will be making about $60 million per year in 2022 and about $75 million per year in 2025 & forward. In order to bring two teams in, they would have to be worth a combined $150 million per year just to keep everyone at the 2025 payout.
Is it worth it to add more teams without an increase in payout? I’m assuming the answer is no, but perhaps there are other factors in play there.
Realistically, I would think the SEC would only do it for an increased payout. 10% seems reasonable.. $7.5 million x 18 teams = $135 million extra
That would mean the two new teams needed to be worth $285 million or more combined.
There are likely only four teams that could bring that kind of value..
Notre Dame
USC
Ohio State
Michigan
One or more of those paired with Clemson and/or Florida State might get there.. but likely not just the two of them by themselves.
Just my opinion.
this is what all of this is about, but you forgot 1 thing, the SEC itself gets an equal share. so its actually currently 17 shares when Tx/OU join.
the comment about streaming is because, traditional viewership is coming to an end in the next 10-15 years. No longer will things like Directtv or dish or cable tv exist in its current format. Direct will not be able to say they are charging $3 for person living in the SEC footprint adn only $1 for those outside.
it will be al a carte and most will be subscription streaming services. Think about the difference in TV viewership habits and internet habits from 2005 until present day.....totally different and there will continue to be seismic shifts to streaming only.
Posted on 8/3/21 at 8:41 am to CockHolliday
quote:
quote:
Over UNC??
EweNC is not an SEC school at all, far less so than even Missouri culture-wise.
UNC is highest profile school in a highly populated state that values college sports
There are only so many of those and other than Ohio State the rest are all in the SEC now
Posted on 8/3/21 at 10:07 am to Ttazhorn
quote:
Doesn't ESPN already have the ACC locked in with their GOR? Doesn't make sense for them to move to the SEC where ESPN would have to give them a better deal..
It only makes sense if ESPN does some math and says that the potential matchups will bring vastly larger viewership numbers, more than anything in the ACC could offer and more than a comparable SEC matchup with a weaker SEC team might otherwise bring. Otherwise yes, they've already got that team's content at their disposal. Better to pay less for it.
This post was edited on 8/3/21 at 10:10 am
Posted on 8/3/21 at 10:18 am to ouflak
GOR is in favor of the conference not the TV partner
ACC could still hold leverage ESPN cant just transfer because the "own it anyway"
ACC could still hold leverage ESPN cant just transfer because the "own it anyway"
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News