Started By
Message
re: SEC Revenue sharing - Still don't understand it.
Posted on 1/6/15 at 10:00 am to bobsacamano
Posted on 1/6/15 at 10:00 am to bobsacamano
He meant to the conference 
1
Posted on 1/6/15 at 10:14 am to Old Sarge
Ya why hare? WE could always be the BIg 12. Its really worked for them......
Posted on 1/6/15 at 10:25 am to TheJoseyWales
LSU needs an intervention. Look, we all know that being curb stomped by Arkansas, having the Aggies steal your DC, and then losing to a woeful Notre Dame team is not going to make anyone's list of greatest seasons... but y'all need some professional help. You aren't sneaking off and cutting yourself or anything are you?
Posted on 1/6/15 at 10:25 am to bobsacamano
quote:
LINK
You should educate yourself before you post such ignorant drivel.
First, the numbers in the list you linked are from the prior year, which was heavily affect by the Big12 money A&M had to forego as part of their decision to leave the conference. Second, it is immaterial to this thread. This thread is about SEC revenue and how it is shared, not the revenue of individual programs, which is only partly affected by the sharing of conference revenue.
I should also add this: when the fat SEC network checks start coming in, you bitches better thank A&M for bringing in about 1/4 of that.
quote:
Given these estimates, the SEC’s portion of revenue should be no less than $400 million annually. In that scenario, each of its 14 universities would net an extra $28 million per year, a truly astounding number, considering the average SEC school made close to $21 million from 2013’s conference payout.
This post was edited on 1/6/15 at 10:32 am
Posted on 1/6/15 at 10:26 am to Arksulli
LSU melt is the reason I get out of bed every morning. 
Posted on 1/6/15 at 10:29 am to LSU1NSEC
Only the top 4 in each Division should get any money.
Posted on 1/6/15 at 10:29 am to Arksulli
quote:
LSU needs an intervention. Look, we all know that being curb stomped by Arkansas, having the Aggies steal your DC, and then losing to a woeful Notre Dame team is not going to make anyone's list of greatest seasons... but y'all need some professional help. You aren't sneaking off and cutting yourself or anything are you?
This deserve it's own thread
Posted on 1/6/15 at 10:34 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
One of these doesn't belong.
I'll let you guess which one.
Shirley you aren't suggesting LSU is not a superior program.
Posted on 1/6/15 at 11:04 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
as superior teams like LSU, Bama, Auburn? One of these doesn't belong.
Auburn didn't play in the game of the century so they don't belong
Posted on 1/6/15 at 11:19 am to Manzielathon
quote:
Considering A&M, Bama, Florida, Auburn, Tenn, Georgia do provide most of the money revenue... you're correct we should change this system to benefit the perennial bottom dwellers more fairly as well as the "state" schools...
The total amount of the distribution is composed of revenue generated from televised football, bowl games, the SEC football championship, televised basketball, the SEC men's basketball tournament, NCAA championships and a supplemental surplus distribution.
Don't start smellin' yourself too much there bruh!
Posted on 1/6/15 at 11:20 am to LSU1NSEC
quote:
superior teams like LSU, Bama, Auburn
This post was edited on 1/6/15 at 11:24 am
Posted on 1/6/15 at 11:28 am to Hugh McElroy
quote:
First, the numbers in the list you linked are from the prior year, which was heavily affect by the Big12 money A&M had to forego as part of their decision to leave the conference.
Ok, let's look at prior years.
2009-2010 revenue: $71.8 million
2010-2011 revenue: $75 Million
2011-2012 revenue: $79 million
2012-2013 revenue (first year in SEC): $119 million
2013-2014 revenue: $93 million
So it looks like TAMU's revenues was more than partly affected by the sharing of conference revenue. I don't really see a drop off from TAMU losing out on the Big 12 money in 2011-2012 since TAMU's revenue increased in the year it left.
quote:
This thread is about SEC revenue and how it is shared, not the revenue of individual programs, which is only partly affected by the sharing of conference revenue.
TAMU went from low to mid $70 million per year total AD revenue to $119 and 93 million per year after it joined the SEC. TAMU has benefited dramatically from revenue sharing. Before joining the SEC, TAMU's revenue was half of Texas's budget. Partly affected? More like almost 30% increase affected.
quote:
I should also add this: when the fat SEC network checks start coming in, you bitches better thank A&M for bringing in about 1/4 of that.
More like you'd better thank the SEC for letting you join in the spoils. The SEC was more worried about the Texas television market than Texas A&M. TAMU has benefited more from the deal than the SEC as a whole has thus far.
This post was edited on 1/6/15 at 11:30 am
Posted on 1/6/15 at 11:28 am to TexasAg13
I know yall joke about the "melt" and it's funny sometimes, but I'm pleasantly surprised by the lack of a real melt by LSU fans. I think if Chavis stayed, there'd have been a melt, but now that everyone is distracted by this new hire at a position that probably needed a change, not as many nega-tigers as usual. I do think yall should keep bringing up Stoops as DC, cause that was a successful troll.
This post was edited on 1/6/15 at 11:29 am
Posted on 1/6/15 at 11:30 am to bobsacamano
quote:
Which means A&M is 9th out of 14 teams on revenue brought into the SEC. Maybe you should rethink your position on revenue sharing.
somebody doesnt understand just how big a deal bringing A&M into the fold was for the SECN...
Posted on 1/6/15 at 11:33 am to Dr RC
quote:
somebody doesnt understand just how big a deal bringing A&M into the fold was for the SECN...
Someone doesn't understand his school's annual revenues were $75 million before joining the SEC and $119 and $93 million after-and his school is still 9th out of 14 in total revenue
Posted on 1/6/15 at 11:35 am to bobsacamano
I think you're confused
Posted on 1/6/15 at 11:51 am to TexasAg13
About tamu's revenue?
Posted on 1/6/15 at 11:59 am to bobsacamano
you are confused about what this is about mayne
its not a bout what each schools makes for itself, its about the money that the SEC shares that is made from bowls, the SECN, TV contract etc.
A&M is bringing in a shite load of cash to the SECN b/c of how big out state population is.
its not a bout what each schools makes for itself, its about the money that the SEC shares that is made from bowls, the SECN, TV contract etc.
A&M is bringing in a shite load of cash to the SECN b/c of how big out state population is.
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:00 pm to bobsacamano
No, about his delusion of grandeur.
Posted on 1/6/15 at 12:11 pm to Dr RC
Thank you A&M for joining the SEC and saving us from financial ruin.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News