Started By
Message
re: SEC Basketball Standings - 2/7/24
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:52 pm to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:52 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
The only melt happening tonight are from the folks who are having a comeapart because I guess I’m not angry enough for them.
nah bro youre melting. Shut up and enjoy being at the top.
0
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:52 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Ask the Auburn fan who started watching basketball in 2017 and felt the need to say “nuh uh!!!”
He posted official standings. Enjoy your L.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:53 pm to Tuscaloosa
But…
It was in front of you face the whole time. LOL
quote:
Why don’t you explain them to the class, internet user Darth_Vader?
It was in front of you face the whole time. LOL
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:54 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Now, using this 3 way tie breaker scenario, can you list the standings in order?
Considering two of the three teams tied for first place currently have not played one another - using this as a tiebreaker today doesn't make sense
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:55 pm to jangalang
quote:
He posted official standings. Enjoy your L.
Those aren’t official standings. Sorry.
Those are unabridged standings that use overall record to differentiate between teams of the same conference record. A metric that isn’t official, isn’t used to name a regular season conference champion, and isn’t used as a tiebreaker for post season seeding.
Sorry.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:55 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:It was over your head to start with. You posted this because you were called out and butt hurt because Bama wasn't #1. Now you can't explain your way out. But carry on. Keep listing what you don't count or care about in your list to make Bama #1 and how the sec doesn't know their system as good as you.
You are not intelligent enough for me to continue responding to at this time.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:55 pm to Auburntiger
quote:
Considering two of the three teams tied for first place currently have not played one another - using this as a tiebreaker today doesn't make sense
Sorry. That’s the way it works.
Bama - .667
Auburn - .500
USC - .000
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:56 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Got it. Thanks.
Now, using this 3 way tie breaker scenario, can you list the standings in order?
TIA.
yeah.
Bama
Auburn
Carolina
but should UT win again it would get muddy.
carolina 1-1
Tennessee 1-1
Bama 2-2
Auburn 1-1
edit...didnt realize this was the second bama/auburn game
This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:57 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Sorry. That’s the way it works.
According to who?
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:58 pm to Auburntiger
quote:
According to who?
The SEC website. You just posted it. Where is there a caveat for two teams not playing each other?
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:02 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
The SEC website. You just posted it. Where is there a caveat for two teams not playing each other?
The tiebreakers are based on the results/standings at the end of the regular season - not the records on Feb 7th...
the tiebreakers are there for seeding for the SEC tournament
Hypothetically if the SEC regular season ended today, Alabama, Auburn, and South Carolina would all be co-champions
( but I'm sure you already know that)
This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 10:03 pm
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:03 pm to Auburntiger
quote:
The tiebreakers are based on the results/standings at the end of the regular season - not three records on Feb 7th...
Right. We’ve well established that there is a 3-way tie for first. This thread derailed into an argument because an Auburn fan (you) didn’t like a list of standings that correctly showed Bama at the top for post season-seeding.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:04 pm to Auburntiger
quote:
Hypothetically if the SEC regular season ended today, Alabama, Auburn, and South Carolina would all be co-champions
Who would be the 1 seed
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:05 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Right. We’ve well established that there is a 3-way tie for first. This thread derailed into an argument because an Auburn fan (you) didn’t like a list of standings that correctly showed Bama at the top for post season-seeding
That was very assumptive of you to think I didn't like the standings that you posted. I never said I didn't like them, I never implied that I didn't like them... I simply posted the current standings listed on the official conference website.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:05 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Right
But yet here you are on the Rant. Saying these are the “real standings”. And the standings posted in another thread “aren’t the real standings”
Interesting
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:05 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
Who would be the 1 seed
It's a moot point because Auburn and South Carolina have not even played yet
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:06 pm to Auburntiger
quote:
Hypothetically if the SEC regular season ended today, Alabama, Auburn, and South Carolina would all be co-champions
This is correct.
The dork thinks it’s all about percentages. The tie breaker scenario comes in play for the seeding of the SEC Tournament when teams are tied at the end of the regular season.
This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:07 pm to WildcatMike
quote:
The tie breaker scenario comes in play for the seeding of the SEC Tournament when teams are tied at the end of the regular season.
Exactly, and there's a lot of basketball to be played
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:09 pm to Rabern57
quote:
About 10 years after half the Bama fans on here started watching football instead of just wearing shirts with 12 on it.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:10 pm to WildcatMike
quote:
The dork thinks it’s all about percentages. The tie breaker scenario comes in play for the seeding of the SEC Tournament when teams are tied at the end of the regular season.
I think I’ve posted this about 3 different times now.
But you don’t read, so idk what you want me to say at this point. It kinda seems like you’re trying to argue with me by repeating exactly what I’ve already stated.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News