Started By
Message

re: SEC and Big10 want to change the playoff.

Posted on 2/18/25 at 10:26 am to
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
8435 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 10:26 am to
quote:

I have to agree they the sec will entertain ND.


I personally would love to see ND in the SEC to get the reactions of B1G. But then that puts the SEC with everybody else having teams in outlying areas with travel issues.
Posted by ukraine_rebel
North Mississippi
Member since Oct 2012
3121 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 10:27 am to
It's the price they pay to maintain the rivalry.

That is if SC wants to play Clemson every year (which some might not), then they would not be involved in the ACC rotation and Clemson not in SEC rotation.
This post was edited on 2/18/25 at 10:29 am
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
35256 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 10:52 am to
What if the entire south east including notre Dame and WVU joined and we got all other ACC teams.


This is what Rivalry Saturday would look like.





Eta. Not the entire southeast. I don’t want uva, Duke or Wake.
This post was edited on 2/18/25 at 10:53 am
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
6533 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 11:10 am to
quote:

I do not think the sec expands any further west Than Norman or Austin.


Nor should it. However, Oklahoma State is inside that region, and Texas is not going to keep voting aye for extended flyovers.

Pick one, FSU or Clemson.
Posted by Opry
Member since Oct 2023
5205 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 12:14 pm to
No permanent rivalries and everyone rotate through everyone else. Only fair way to do it.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
35256 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 12:14 pm to
I wonder how the sec views these ACC schools.


Should they pick them Up or allow the big ten into the Carolina’s, Georgia and Florida. ?
Posted by 1801
Charleston
Member since Aug 2012
7844 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

A ninth SEC conference game would then set in motion a scheduling agreement with the Big Ten, which itself already plays nine league games. The scheduling agreement, though still in the discussion stages, would pit SEC and Big Ten teams against one another in annual games to be sold as a separate television package.


the is not one damn thing that SEC football does that needs to let the big2t9en piggy back off of the SEC brand - frick'em

they wanted Rutgers vs Washington and Nebraska vs Maryland and Northwestern vs UCLA - let those idiots live in that horrible reality -

SEC football is incredibly more entertaining to everyone - Yankee school fans watch our football - Southern folk DGAF to watch their football - that's the difference - and it's a significant difference -

Greg Sankey has an absolute gold mine of inventory if he wanted to move the SEC to 10 league games - Carolina Florida Georgia & Kentucky can still play our ACC rivals too - fan interest & tv ratings will demand the SEC get 4 spots in a CFP regardless of record due to more league games -

the future of the SEC is not with the big1t3en - it's actually with schools currently in the Big 12 & ACC - the proof that the big1t9en will die on the vine is CBS's failure in TV ratings last fall - 16 teams makes no difference as that conference still has 2 or at times 3 games per week of interest - the big2t8en needs the SEC more than the SEC could ever need that conference for football games -

the killshot I hope for is the SEC joining up with the B12 & ACC - alienating the Jim Delany Legends & Leaders Conference once and for all - the great Roy Kramer would pull that trigger too - $live & $ankey not so much -
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
24135 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

the is not one damn thing that SEC football does that needs to let the big2t9en piggy back off of the SEC brand - frick'em



When will people understand that the B1G makes money, more money than anyone else.

LINK

quote:

On the field, the SEC is unmatched. At the bank, the Big Ten actually has a slight edge. According to tax filings released in May, the Big Ten reported revenue of $879.9 million compared with $852.6 million for the SEC.

The ACC was a distant third even though it jumped from $617 million in 2021-22 to $707 million in 2022-23.
The Pac-12, which saw 10 of its 12 members disperse to other conferences this summer, generated $603.9 million. The Big 12 was fifth at $510.7 million.


The SEC and B1G want to continue making cash, and doing an annual B1G/SEC challenge makes more money for both conferences.
Posted by ukraine_rebel
North Mississippi
Member since Oct 2012
3121 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:18 pm to
Keep in mind with this model, how you fared in non-conference would have little bearing on whether or not you make the playoff, that would depend solely on how you did in your conference + how your conference did as a whole in the intraconference challenges.

Take Georgia, they could go 0-3 in the nonconference games, but then go 6-3 or 7-2 in the SEC and finish 4th, and if the SEC earned 4 bids, they would get one.
Posted by BurgTiger
Member since Feb 2014
3084 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 4:49 pm to
Absolute JOKE if they don’t make ND join a league. They have no leverage! You don’t want to join a league? Great, this is only for teams in a conference. Allow ND to pull a UCF and give themselves a fake championship every year and watch their program die on the vine.

Second, look at the recruiting and ratings disparity now. The B12 and ACC are lucky they get 2 spots and not 1.
Posted by Nasty_Canasta
Your Mom’s house
Member since Dec 2024
540 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 8:41 am to
You’ll have to forgive e the resident reject 1801. He hates anything north of the Mason- Dixon line so his approval on college football decisions is not only Not required but it is in direct antithesis to where things are headed for the sport. And that’s a good thing. If it upsets turds like that, it’s gotta be a good decision
Posted by Nasty_Canasta
Your Mom’s house
Member since Dec 2024
540 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 9:27 am to
quote:

the future of the SEC is not with the big1t3en - it's actually with schools currently in the Big 12 & ACC


quote:

Southern folk DGAF to watch their football - that's the difference - and it's a significant difference -


Yes tell us about those die hard southern schools like Syracuse, Boston College, Cincinnati, Utah, Colorado, Arizona, West Virginia and Notre Dame lol. God, you’re stupid
Posted by 1801
Charleston
Member since Aug 2012
7844 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Yes tell us about those
quote:

schools currently in the Big 12 & ACC
FSU Clem NC NCSU Duke GT UMiami VT

TCU TT KU K-State OSU Colorado ASU UofA - also TCU is interchangeable with SMU -

the SEC doesn't need anything from any other school outside of those 16 for OOC games to continue to be the best brand in CFB - and it really doesn't even need those 16 schools -

quote:

God, you’re stupid
quote:

Nasty_Canasta
Posted by allin2010
Auburn
Member since Aug 2011
18314 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 10:06 am to
Clay Travis proposed (I Agree) start the first weekend with the Big 10 vs. SEC football Challenge over a 5 day Period starting on Thursday Night.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
24135 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Clay Travis proposed (I Agree) start the first weekend with the Big 10 vs. SEC football Challenge over a 5 day Period starting on Thursday Night.



I would rather they do it week 3 every year personally. I'm not sure how you look week 1 is nearly reflective of the team you will be in the season. Week 3 you have a couple games played and kind of know what your team can do
Posted by Nasty_Canasta
Your Mom’s house
Member since Dec 2024
540 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 10:42 am to
quote:

1801


No matter how many times you participate in those civil war re-enactments, the outcome doesn’t change. You lose. Deal with it



Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
8435 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 10:52 am to
I want Duke & Va. over NCState & WV.

& a major “Next!” instead of FSU (although I know the Fl./FSU rivalry).
This post was edited on 2/19/25 at 10:55 am
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
21077 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

So, you want the B1G with 8 more schools than the SEC?


Out of all of the B1G schools, they only have about 4 decent teams. The rest blow arse. The SEC is already too big. We don't need to add anyone else unless we add some weaker football teams (historically) like Memphis and Kansas.
Posted by Chris ALL Capps
Member since Jan 2024
175 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:39 pm to
Lol. Nasty_Canasta posts on Eleven Warriors as Bucktown 5.7×28. He has stiff competition but is one of the bigger dumbasses on a site cock full of them. I wouldn't put too much stock into what he says.
Posted by Nasty_Canasta
Your Mom’s house
Member since Dec 2024
540 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 2:40 pm to
Damn right I do. I own it bitch
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter