Started By
Message
locked post

Record against common opponents

Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:28 pm
Posted by Dixie.Reb
Oxford
Member since Jul 2013
2832 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:28 pm
Everyone knows transitive wins are BS -eventually every conference has a circle of suck - but record against common opponents is legit enough that every conference uses it as a tiebreaker. This is especially true if you have at least 3 common opponents which minimizes the impact of lucky results. So how do the SEC contenders for the last spot stack up?

Ole Miss vs Bama
LSU - Bama +32 big advantage Bama
UGA - Ole Miss +11 advantage ole Miss
Scar- Ole Miss +22 advantage ole Miss
Oklahoma- Ole Miss +33 big advantage ole Miss

Final score: 3-1 ole Miss (+34 aggregate)

Ole Miss vs SCar
UK - SCar +28 big advantage SCar
LSU - Even Tie
Head to Head - Ole Miss + 24 big advantage Ole Miss

Final score 1-1-1. Tiebreaker is head to head. Ole Miss wins.

Bama vs SCar
Mizzou - Bama +30 big advantage Bama
LSU - Bama +32 big advantage Bama
Scar - Bama +2 advantage Bama
Vandy- SCar +26 big advantage SCar

Final Score: 3-1 Bama (+38 aggregate) plus head to head.


So while SCar is super close to Ole Miss, they lose because of head to head and trail Bama significantly even though the head to head game was close. Ole Miss should get the last spot with a clear lead among common opponents compared to Bama.
Posted by Aguga
Member since Aug 2021
3203 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:29 pm to
The horse is Dead!!’
Posted by Vincenzo Pantangelli
Member since Nov 2024
1410 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:30 pm to
No way in hell Ole Miss gets in over their beloved tide
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
7032 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:30 pm to
We gave up on transitive BS about 3 weeks into this season.
Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
7341 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:34 pm to
You're effectively trying to use the transitive property using margin of victory/defeat in your analysis.

That's worse than just using the transitive property, not better.

Teams "play to win the game". Not to put up more points on a team they are ahead of. While fans like to see it, most coaches take the win even when they could tack on more points because the points don't matter.

Posted by Tuscaloosa
12x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
49297 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

No way in hell Ole Miss gets in over their beloved tide


And they shouldn’t.

Bama has a better strength of schedule, better strength of record, better FPI, higher SP+, higher Sagarin, higher rank average of losses, higher rank average of best wins, 2 more wins vs. Top 40 teams, no losses at home, etc.
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
6840 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Bama vs SCar
Mizzou - Bama +30 big advantage Bama
LSU - Bama +32 big advantage Bama
Scar - Bama +2 advantage Bama
Vandy- SCar +26 big advantage SCar



You left out Oklahoma. That's, y'know, kinda important.

+47 SC.
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 2:42 pm
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
6096 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:41 pm to
The aggregate score doesn’t really matter.

The facts are:

1- UGA - Ole Miss 3 score clear victory vs Bama 1-score game decided late in the fourth.

2- USC - Ole Miss 3 score clear road victory vs Bama 1-score game decided late in the fourth.

3- Oklahoma - Ole Miss clear victory vs Alabama 3-score loss.

All overwhelmingly favor Ole Miss


So, the question is, does Alabama’s blowout win over LSU vs Ole Miss OT loss to LSU make up the overwhelming gap in the other three games????

I’d argue at best for Alabama, the OU-LSU results are a push with Ole Miss.

That leaves the fact that Ole Miss had convincing wins over UGA and at USC, compared to Bama’s games that came down to the wire.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
12x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
49297 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

The facts are:


Your “facts” are pretty much irrelevant.

Bama is better in almost every single metric, including but not limited to SOS, SOR, FPI, etc.
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
9508 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

lsusa


I'd advise you just go ahead and mentally prepare for Alabama to make it into the playoffs.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105102 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

The aggregate score doesn’t really matter.

The facts are:

1- UGA - Ole Miss 3 score clear victory vs Bama 1-score game decided late in the fourth.

2- USC - Ole Miss 3 score clear road victory vs Bama 1-score game decided late in the fourth.

3- Oklahoma - Ole Miss clear victory vs Alabama 3-score loss.

All overwhelmingly favor Ole Miss


So, the question is, does Alabama’s blowout win over LSU vs Ole Miss OT loss to LSU make up the overwhelming gap in the other three games????

I’d argue at best for Alabama, the OU-LSU results are a push with Ole Miss.

That leaves the fact that Ole Miss had convincing wins over UGA and at USC, compared to Bama’s games that came down to the wire.



If you did this process for Alabama vs Georgia

Alabama beat Georgia at home. Slight Bama.

Georgia won a hard fought game at home vs Tennessee. Alabama lost a hard fought game on the road vs Georgia. Slight UGA.

Georgia beat Auburn at home by 18. Alabama beat Auburn at home by 14. Push.



Well, if that is all that really matters then it's clear that Alabama and Georgia should be neck and neck to get into the playoffs.

This of course, does not make sense, because defining an entire season of games on the 3-4 crossovers isn't a good process as it ignores 2/3 of the rest of the season. It ignores Georgia beating Texas and Clemson. It ignores Alabama losing to Oklahoma and Vanderbilt as well as beating South Carolina and Missouri. It's a silly way to compare seasons.
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 2:47 pm
Posted by HYDRebs
Houston
Member since Sep 2014
1460 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:49 pm to
So what you are saying is that Ole Miss is clearly better than Bama and barely better than South Carolina.

This makes the most sense and I can get behind that
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105102 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 2:51 pm to
Ole Miss vs Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt won at Kentucky by 7. Ole Miss lost at home to Kentucky by 3. Big Vandy.

Vanderbilt lost to South Carolina by 21. Ole Miss won at South Carolina by 24. Big Ole Miss.

Vanderbilt lost at LSU by 7. Ole Miss lost at LSU by 3. Push.


Looks like Vandy and OIe Miss should be neck and neck per this common opponent analysis.



Ole Miss vs LSU

Ole Miss lost to LSU by 3 on the road. Slight LSU.

Ole Miss won at South Carolina by 24. LSU won at South Carolina by 3. Ole Miss.

Ole Miss won at Arkansas by 32. LSU won at Arkansas by 24. Push.

Ole Miss lost at Florida by 7. LSU lost at Florida by 11. Push.

Ole Miss beat Oklahoma by 12. LSU beat Oklahoma by 20. Slight LSU.



Looks like LSU and Ole Miss are neck and neck using the unquestioned number one way to compare teams, which LSU moving ahead due to winning the head to head game.
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 2:55 pm
Posted by Dixie.Reb
Oxford
Member since Jul 2013
2832 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Ole Miss beat Oklahoma by 12. LSU beat Oklahoma by 20. Slight LSU.


quote:

Ole Miss won at Arkansas by 32. LSU won at Arkansas by 24. Push.


You can’t even troll right. How is an 8 point win for LSU a slight advantage but an 8 point win for ole miss is a push?

The actual math would be 1 big advantage for ole miss, one slight advantage for lsu and 3 pushes. Big advantage > small advantage so head to head doesn’t come in. Also they don’t have the same record like the 3 actual contenders so no tiebreaker is even needed
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
69050 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

You can’t even troll right. How is an 8 point win for LSU a slight advantage but an 8 point win for ole miss is a push?

because a 32 point win and 24 points win are both blowouts.

A 12 point win is not a blowout, but a 20 point win is.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105102 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

You can’t even troll right. How is an 8 point win for LSU a slight advantage but an 8 point win for ole miss is a push?


Because the difference in winning by 4 scores and 5 scores when the game is over at the end of the 3rd quarter is negligible. There is a reason stat models don't include garbage time stats and garbage time is defined as when a game is "over" and everything after that is not a true measure of the game going on - just teams playing out the clock.

Alabama beat WKU 66-0. Alabama beat Mercer 52-7. Equating WKU as being more impressive than Mercer because the final was technically a bigger margin is idiotic.
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 3:07 pm
Posted by Pastor Mike
Florida
Member since Dec 2020
6042 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:07 pm to
Somebody droppin' RECEIPTS!!!
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
6096 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

This of course, does not make sense, because defining an entire season of games on the 3-4 crossovers isn't a good process as it ignores 2/3 of the rest of the season.


According to a graphic posted in another thread, the selection committee uses:

1- strength of schedule
2- head to head
3- outcome vs common opponents


Alabama and Ole Miss didnt play each other, and the difference in SOS is negligible. Meaning that outcome vs common opponents is probably the best area to compare.

There are certainly areas, down the line, where you can say that Alabama’s blowout win over Missouri was better than Ole Miss’s blowout win over Arkansas, or Alabama’s loss to Vandy was “better” than Ole Miss’s
loss to Kentucky. Alabama’s win over Wisconsin was better than Ole Miss’s win over “Wake Forrest”.

Of course, I’d offer that head-to-head is direct, common opponents is one level down though less valid, and the validity decreases at each level.
Posted by theballguy
tMoral compass of poliboard
Member since Oct 2011
19330 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Bama has a better strength of schedule, better strength of record, better FPI, higher SP+, higher Sagarin, higher rank average of losses, higher rank average of best wins, 2 more wins vs. Top 40 teams, no losses at home, etc.



Bama's teh clear playoff choice
Posted by theballguy
tMoral compass of poliboard
Member since Oct 2011
19330 posts
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:17 pm to
I mean who would be favored for each in the 12 team playoff if Bama was to play each of them?

Only 3 or 4 would be favored to beat Bama by a few points at best
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter