Started By
Message
re: Ranking all SEC football Programs
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:49 pm to Farmer1906
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:49 pm to Farmer1906
I hate this thread purely because it makes me agree with Farmer...SMH. 
0
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:49 pm to Farmer1906
I hate this thread purely because it makes me agree with Farmer...SMH.
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:51 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
I think Conference Titles, Wins, Ranked Seasons > Head to Head.
Conference titles is a bad idea. Wins are still not great but ranked seasons is fine.
This post was edited on 7/9/18 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:51 pm to Korin
quote:
Looks like you DO care since you keep posting about it and all.
Guess you won't be giving Alabama anymore crap for retroactively claiming titles then, huh? Can't have it both ways.
You misread or misunderstood. I don't care that others may not want us to count them.
However, more to the point, these discussions are exactly why the only thing that really matters is the year we are in. If we win another one, Auburn will claim yet another title because they can't stand to see yet another hated rival pull ahead farther.
Thus...the current year is what really matters.
quote:I've never given Alabama crap for their titles. What good would it do? You could take half their titles away and they would still be so far ahead of everybody else it wouldn't matter.
Guess you won't be giving Alabama anymore crap for retroactively claiming titles then, huh? Can't have it both ways.
This post was edited on 7/9/18 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:52 pm to BadAgg7
quote:
nattys >>> sec titles.
Not in the SEC...
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:52 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
I hate this thread purely because it makes me agree with Farmer...SMH.
Wow. Twice. You really hate this thread!
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:54 pm to MSHawg1
quote:UGA has played 36 more games than LSU
I had LSU ahead of UGA at first but changed when I saw that UGA had broken 800 wins
Win pct is 65.1326% for UGA compared to 65.0482% for LSU.....
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:54 pm to DawgsLife
That means you also recognize GT with 4 titles since that's what they claim. Can't have it both ways. 
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:56 pm to lsupride87
quote:
UGA has played 36 more games than LSU
What's your point? We won every last one of them.
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:56 pm to DawgsLife
quote:Who?
Some would not count your 1958 title.
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:56 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
I think Conference Titles, Wins, Ranked Seasons > Head to Head.
Arkansas and A&M are close enough that you can also argue any 5-10 year inconsistency in schedule changes alot.
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:56 pm to Korin
quote:
That means you also recognize GT with 4 titles since that's what they claim. Can't have it both ways.
Listen vewy, vewy carefully. I. don't. care. I care about this year.
ETA
Just looked at their years, and will say they would have legitimate claims as they were undefeated in those years...had 1 tie in the 1990 one.
This post was edited on 7/9/18 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:57 pm to MSHawg1
Our quarterbacks are better than yours past and present and we have had some of the best and notable QBs to play in the conference over our history.
Your 0-2 in Sugar Bowls against Ole Miss but you have fluky 4th and twenty five.
Your bowl record is an embarrassment to not one but two conferences while ours is at the top of the conference.
Bert owned us like a large plate of ribs so I will give you that.
Your 0-2 in Sugar Bowls against Ole Miss but you have fluky 4th and twenty five.
Your bowl record is an embarrassment to not one but two conferences while ours is at the top of the conference.
Bert owned us like a large plate of ribs so I will give you that.
This post was edited on 7/9/18 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:58 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Listen vewy, vewy carefully. I. don't. care. I care about this year.
If you didn't care then you wouldn't constantly post about it.
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:59 pm to DawgsLife
quote:If we played the same amount of games as UGA, we would only have roughly 1-2 less wins than UGA and we would be over that 800 mark he so covets.......
What's your point?
Actually, we would likely have more wins than yall.......Yall have more ties which help you win pct though
Him having yall ahead of us due to "21" more wins doesnt make much sense
This post was edited on 7/9/18 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:59 pm to beatbammer
quote:
((2)) If UGA is allowed their retro-active championship from 1942, then Auburn is allowed their retro-active championship from 1913. Starts on Page 108 (LINK) And, yeah, Auburn could validly argue 2 more, but we won't have that discussion here.
In which case UGA could claim 5 total (1927, 42, 46, 68, and 80). Either go by what the schools claim now or go by maximum magical number that could ever be claimed but moving the goal posts in between isn’t a valid option
Posted on 7/9/18 at 3:59 pm to BurnsideStyle
So after all that, we still have an 8 game lead in the series. Thanks for proving my point.
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:00 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:
In which case UGA could claim 5 total (1927, 42, 46, 68, and 80). Either go by what the schools claim now or go by maximum magical number that could ever be claimed but moving the goal posts in between isn’t a valid option
Those aren't the only choices though.
This post was edited on 7/9/18 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:01 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:Go by the ncaa link on this page
In which case UGA could claim 5 total (1927, 42, 46, 68, and 80). Either go by what the schools claim now or go by maximum magical number that could ever be claimed but moving the goal posts in between isn’t a valid option
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:01 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Some would not count your 1958 title.
quote:
Who?
Chicken, for one.
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News