Started By
Message

re: Ranking all SEC football Programs

Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:02 pm to
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46488 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:02 pm to
Except that UGA has literally won 21 more games than LSU. That’s 21 more times we have proven to be victorious in a football field that LSU can’t counter in an argument. Not our fault LSU hasn’t played as many games for whatever reason and it’s not like LSU couldnt I’ve had better seasons in the last and won 21+ games to move ahead of UGA
Posted by BurnsideStyle
Member since May 2014
1760 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:02 pm to
Wrong. It means your point that we have had one QB and nothing notable is incorrect.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Go by the ncaa link on this page

His point is that the NCAA has several sites that say different things. One NCAA site that an Auburn posted showed something like 5 titles for Auburn and he wanted to use that, until I pointed out that the same site showed Georgia with 6.

ETA
No, I don't know how to find the site again. I've tried but can't find it now.
This post was edited on 7/9/18 at 4:04 pm
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Go by the ncaa link on this page

Georgia fans don't like that link though.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95170 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Except that UGA has literally won 21 more games than LSU. That’s 21 more times we have proven to be victorious in a football field that LSU can’t counter in an argument. Not our fault LSU hasn’t played as many games for whatever reason and it’s not like LSU couldnt I’ve had better seasons in the last and won 21+ games to move ahead of UGA

Using total wins and not win percentage is very dumb


I dont know what else to say
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Georgia fans don't like that link though.

You sure do paint with a broad brush, don't you?
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

His point is that the NCAA has several sites that say different things. One NCAA site that an Auburn posted showed something like 5 titles for Auburn and he wanted to use that, until I pointed out that the same site showed Georgia with 6.

ETA
No, I don't know how to find the site again. I've tried but can't find it now.

LINK
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95170 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

His point is that the NCAA has several sites that say different things
There is only one NCAA.COM
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46488 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:04 pm to
So we have to forfeit a title because an entity that had nothing to do with assigning football titles and that almost every fan universally reviles made an arbitrary list of who they would give the title to?

Nah, I’ll just stick with either what the schools think they have or what the fans think they should have. NCAA has never had and never will have a place in this argument
This post was edited on 7/9/18 at 4:07 pm
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

You sure do paint with a broad brush, don't you?

Funny, you made a response thread today doing that very thing. "Florida fans think they're loaded this season!"
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

Using total wins and not win percentage is very dumb


I dont know what else to say

I tend to agree. if all schools started playing football at the same time, I could understand, but they started at different time. Crap, Yale has a ton of titles, but most were won when only the Ivy league was playing football.
This post was edited on 7/9/18 at 4:06 pm
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46488 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:05 pm to
It certainly sucks from your point of view, I guess. Never mind that our win percentage is still higher so I don’t know what you’re trying to say.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

So we have to forfeit a title because an entity that had nothing to do and almost every fan universally reviles made an arbitrary list of who they would give the title to?

Nah, I’ll just stick with either what the schools think they have or what the fans think they should have. NCAA has never had and never will have a place in this argument

So then you can't say anything about Bama 1941 since the school claims it. Can't have it both ways.
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46488 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:07 pm to
When did I say anything about Bama in 1941?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95170 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

It certainly sucks from your point of view, I guess. Never mind that our win percentage is still higher so I don’t know what you’re trying to say.
I am saying uga has a win percentage of .651 and LSU has a win pct of .650

I am saying UGA played 36 more games so using total wins instead of win percentage is dumnb


Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46488 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:09 pm to
Cool. UGA has more wins over more games and a higher win percentage. What’s your point?
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Funny, you made a response thread today doing that very thing. "Florida fans think they're loaded this season!"


A response thread? no I didn't. I said some Florida fans. maybe you should provide a link where I said all Florida fans? And you are also misrepresenting what i said.

Here is what i said:

Florida fans saying things like "...left you for a prettier girl.." and so forth. It's been entertaining, to say the least to watch.

And another Florida fan admitted to what i said.

Guilty as charged, UF will win a minimum of 9 games this year. UF vs UG on Halloween will decide the East.


Your response?
And I can find posts from Georgia fans saying how y'all will go 15-0 for the next 3 seasons so...

I am still waiting for the link to that post.

Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36703 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

In which case UGA could claim 5 total (1927, 42, 46, 68, and 80


Don't know about 1927 so I'll go with what you said. 1942 and 1946 are okay with me and only a loon would argue with you about 1980.

But don't count 1968. Seriously. Even if someone else does,fine. Ohio State would have crushed that team. Georgia was 8-0-2 and the tie vs 6-2-2 Houston was very fortunate and late. Arkansas completely stifled Georgia in the Sugar.

Very good team,but don't count that one as a title.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:11 pm to
You first. We're still waiting for you to show us where 3 UF posters said we were "loaded" this year.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/9/18 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

I am saying uga has a win percentage of .651 and LSU has a win pct of .650

I am saying UGA played 36 more games so using total wins instead of win percentage is dumnb

They have this strange obsession with regular season wins over actual titles.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter