Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/12/26 at 4:28 pm to tigerskin
Posted on 2/12/26 at 4:44 pm to tigerskin
wait wtf?
so NCAA denied once
then denied appeal
now some other local court can over ride them?
what a fricking clownshow
so NCAA denied once
then denied appeal
now some other local court can over ride them?
what a fricking clownshow
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:02 pm to reggierayreb
quote:
The terrible look is a bunch of LSU and MSU posters
Should be pretty commonplace by now.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:10 pm to tigerskin
quote:
All eyes are on Trinidad Chambliss' preliminary injunction hearing today, and for good reason. But even if the ruling goes his way, that's just winning round one. The NCAA will almost certainly appeal right away, turning this into a longer fight.
The NCAA will have a heavy burden.
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:12 pm to Fat Bastard
Their "case" is absolutely pathetic and every Ole Miss fan should be completely embarrassed at what they're attempting to do.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:13 pm to Dr RC
Cry. More.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:16 pm to Dr RC
quote:
Their "case" is absolutely pathetic and every Ole Miss fan should be completely embarrassed at what they're attempting to do.
I don't blame Ole Miss fans for being happy, you want your program to do whatever it takes to win.
But the case is pretty bad, it wouldn't have a prayer in a neutral environment.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:18 pm to SidewalkTiger
At this point, who cares. Let the kid play one more year. I want them to be at their best when we play them and let the best team in that day win.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:19 pm to Portcityblues
These types of cases have bigger implications on the future of college football.
They can’t just say “aw shucks let the kid play”
They can’t just say “aw shucks let the kid play”
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:20 pm to Portcityblues
quote:
At this point, who cares. Let the kid play one more year
It kind of sucks that we're setting a precedent that a kid can be granted a medical redshirt on a minor ailment when he wasn't going to play anyway..
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:22 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
At this point, who cares. Let the kid play one more year. I want them to be at their best when we play them and let the best team in that day win.
It's not really about that.
It just further proves that the NCAA has no pull or power and is a complete joke.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:22 pm to BearCrocs
At this point, he'll miss the first 4 games as the judge will still be delivering his ruling...
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:24 pm to DownSouthJukin
It's not crying to call out your school for being pathetic titty babies for trying to completely break the sport just b/c you're too chickenshit to break in a new QB.
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:28 pm to Dr RC
I have no doubt you felt the same way when A&M filed a lawsuit against the NCAA and won an Injunction declaring Rashaun Agee eligible last season.
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:31 pm to Dr RC
quote:yeah the NCAA giving a kid a 9th year of eligibility isn’t an issue but Ole Miss seeking a 6th year for their QB is the real problem
It's not crying to call out your school for being pathetic titty babies for trying to completely break the sport just b/c you're too chickenshit to break in a new QB.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:32 pm to Dr RC
quote:
It's not crying to call out your school for being pathetic titty babies for trying to completely break the sport just b/c you're too chickenshit to break in a new QB.
Ole Miss breaking the sport?
How long was Pavia at this? Beck? That dude admitted he hadn't been to class in 2 years.
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:33 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
NCAA giving a kid a 9th year of eligibility isn’t an issue but Ole Miss seeking a 6th year for their QB is the real problem
Maybe neither should happen
This is the problem with everyone being so short-sighted out of their own self-interest. Is having guys play forever really what you want out of college sports? Because this ruling isn’t just going to benefit your team. It’s going to open the flood gates for everyone to file lawsuits and make up ailments. Apparently all you need is a state court judge and a post-dated letter to show the NCAA acted in bad faith. Is that really what we want? And pretend it’s not your starting QB filing the lawsuit when you answer
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:34 pm to lsufball19
Maybe but the NCAA giving that kid a 9th year but denying Chambliss shows a clear lack of consistency. The courts are just ensuring they are consistent across the board
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:35 pm to OleVaught14
Rashaun Agee didn't argue a sore throat should equal medical hardship but nice try. 
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News