re: Ole Miss got screwed

So I guess next week, the conspiracy won’t have to worry about the Vandy-UT game bc one is going to a bowl, they will be overseeing other games to fit the agenda? Geez people.

If the ground jars the ball loose in any way, it’s incomplete. The replay shows the ball coming loose from his one hand before the DB started grabbing it. It’s a dumb rule but it’s incomplete. Not even debatable.

quote:

---

That play could only go 2 ways. Catch or interception. SEC refs say incomplete

---

That's kind of the way I saw it too. Never expected a call of incomplete. Neither receiver or defender ever allowed the ball to touch the ground. Just typical SEC officiating.

Jesus, what is it with people not being able to understand the basic rules of football? Even commentators and writers.

On replay it was clearly NOT a catch.

NCAA rules are clear.

"If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without
contact by an opponent) he must maintain complete and continuous
control of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground,
whether in the field of play or in the end zone."

At the :07 mark of the clip on Saturday Down South that was linked above, you can clearly see that the receiver has the ball coming out of the receiver's hands.

You may be able to rip replay officials for other calls during the year, but this was a damn good call.

quote:

---

That play could only go 2 ways. Catch or interception. SEC refs say incomplete

That's kind of the way I saw it too. Never expected a call of incomplete. Neither receiver or defender ever allowed the ball to touch the ground. Just typical SEC officiating.

---

This is just a further example of posters being quick to trash the officials, when they themselves don't even know the rules. The receiver clearly did not maintain possession of the ball continuously through the act of falling to the ground. The ball comes out at the :07 mark and the defender secures possession while his feet are out of bounds. That's why it was called incomplete, and frankly it's obvious if you actually know what the rule is.

quote:

---

This is just a further example of posters being quick to trash the officials, when they themselves don't even know the rules. The receiver clearly did not maintain possession of the ball continuously through the act of falling to the ground. The ball comes out at the :07 mark and the defender secures possession while his feet are out of bounds. That's why it was called incomplete, and frankly it's obvious if you actually know what the rule is

---

do you think this would have been a touchdown if the receiver played for Bama?

quote:

---

For those of us who didn't see the game:

LINK

---

Thanks!

quote:

---

I think I've got a head of cabbage in the refrigerator with more brain cells than you. Dumbass can't even read...much less grasp a basic rule of football

---

in other words, you would have went to jail on a domestic violence charge had that ever happened to Bama on the last play of the game.

DB's legs were out of bounds when he got it.

Looked like a catch to me.