0
Started By
Message
re: Ole Miss AD Keith Carter confirms they're trying to bring 5th year players in
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:40 pm to The Pirate King
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:40 pm to The Pirate King
The rules were: these guys can have a 5th year.
LSU said ok
Then the SEC said: we want to change rules.
LSU said ok
Then the SEC said: we want to change rules.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:40 pm to That LSU Guy
quote:
"There's a lot of parts of this I don't like. I don't think professionals should come back to college sports and college football. Do I believe NFL players should come back to college? No.
However, I will operate at the highest level within the rules to give LSU the most competitive advantage as possible. As are many other major programs. When the rules and laws change, we will operate at the highest level at that time within the rules."
OMYGAWD, HE'S RUINING THE FOOTBAW
KICK THEM OUT!!!
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:41 pm to The Pirate King
Melt
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:43 pm to Landmass
quote:
Melt
MeLt
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:05 pm to The Pirate King
are you retarded? he literally says available 5th year players meaning those that did not go the NFL. those players that can play based on the TRO for 5th year players from 2022... not NFL Players
Louisianna has the most dense stupid citizens in the entire country.
Louisianna has the most dense stupid citizens in the entire country.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:06 pm to HailFreezusOver
lol
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:33 pm to The Pirate King
Like NFL players?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:34 pm to HailFreezusOver
Did the NCAA say these 5th year players can play?
Did the NCAA change its mind and I somehow missed it?
I'm not asking what the SEC said or did. I'm asking what the NCAA said about class of 2022, 5 for 5, and 5th year players from the class of 2022 and having ruled them ineligible. That hasn't changed, has it?
Because otherwise, it would appear these athletes are still technically ineligible, and you seem to be splitting hairs over which TROs count and which don't. Perhaps I'm wrong and you will clarify. Thanks!
Did the NCAA change its mind and I somehow missed it?
I'm not asking what the SEC said or did. I'm asking what the NCAA said about class of 2022, 5 for 5, and 5th year players from the class of 2022 and having ruled them ineligible. That hasn't changed, has it?
Because otherwise, it would appear these athletes are still technically ineligible, and you seem to be splitting hairs over which TROs count and which don't. Perhaps I'm wrong and you will clarify. Thanks!
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:38 pm to The Pirate King
Don’t hate the 5th year player
Hate the game
Hate the game
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:39 pm to The Pirate King
Whale, whale, whale
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:41 pm to Droopy
quote:
Because otherwise, it would appear these athletes are still technically ineligible, and you seem to be splitting hairs over which TROs count and which don't. Perhaps I'm wrong and you will clarify. Thanks!
I mean he’s clearly encouraging ineligible players behind the scenes to get a TRO!
That’s conduct detrimental to the NCAA and SHOULD BE BANNED!!!!
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:43 pm to The Pirate King
Reading the forum on this topic today, there seems to be a shortage of posters who are able to do nuance, abstract reasoning, critical thinking, and simple logic. Let’s have some fun with a little experiment for anyone who thinks they’ve got it.
Four statements:
1. “I am opposed to the NCAA 5-in-5 rule.”
2. “I think the NCAA made a mistake by not making the rule retroactive.”
3. “The attempts in court to gain retroactivity have no merit and should not be granted.”
4. “I want my school to take advantage of any final ruling that orders the NCAA to grant retroactivity.”
Which of the following do you agree with?
A. Statement 2 is inconsistent only with statements 1 and 3.
B. Statement 3 is inconsistent only with statements 2 and 4.
C. There are at least four inconsistencies between the four statements.
D. There are no inconsistencies between the four statements.
Anyone up to the challenge? No need to show your work or give reasons, just type A, B, C, or D.
Hint: This isn’t one of those trick questions seeking the “most correct” answer. One and only one answer is correct.
Should be fun. Go.
Four statements:
1. “I am opposed to the NCAA 5-in-5 rule.”
2. “I think the NCAA made a mistake by not making the rule retroactive.”
3. “The attempts in court to gain retroactivity have no merit and should not be granted.”
4. “I want my school to take advantage of any final ruling that orders the NCAA to grant retroactivity.”
Which of the following do you agree with?
A. Statement 2 is inconsistent only with statements 1 and 3.
B. Statement 3 is inconsistent only with statements 2 and 4.
C. There are at least four inconsistencies between the four statements.
D. There are no inconsistencies between the four statements.
Anyone up to the challenge? No need to show your work or give reasons, just type A, B, C, or D.
Hint: This isn’t one of those trick questions seeking the “most correct” answer. One and only one answer is correct.
Should be fun. Go.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:44 pm to Adam Banks
I see you're still waiting on an answer.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:44 pm to The Pirate King
Whale, whale, whale…
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:45 pm to wadewilson
I frequently ask that question but NEVER get an answer
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:45 pm to RT1941
quote:
He wants to do it within the framework of the rules.
So does Kiffin you disingenuous twat
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:46 pm to The Pirate King
They won't respond to this, lol.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:47 pm to Adam Banks
I'm not surprised
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:48 pm to stopitnow1
lol, I know. Which prolly proves my point just as well.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:50 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
Ole Miss AD Keith Carter confirms they're trying to bring 5th year players in
I think it was all those Indiana players picking their kids up from junior high school.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News