Started By
Message
Ole Miss AD Keith Carter confirms they're trying to bring 5th year players in
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:01 pm
Riding the high horse while trying to bring in the players is comical
literally the same thing LSU is doing.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:05 pm to The Pirate King
He wants to do it within the framework of the rules.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:07 pm to The Pirate King
At this point, I don't think anyone is opposed to "5 year players" per se.
What folks are opposed to are players that signed contracts with pro team, players that practiced with pro teams and players that played pre-season games with pro teams coming back to college for a 5th year...
What folks are opposed to are players that signed contracts with pro team, players that practiced with pro teams and players that played pre-season games with pro teams coming back to college for a 5th year...
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:08 pm to The Pirate King
Interesting. Is he alluding to guys that signed NFL contracts or 5th year guys in general…
OM has played the victim for months so hopefully it’s the latter.
OM has played the victim for months so hopefully it’s the latter.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:10 pm to The Pirate King
After they whiffed on Dae’Quan Wright though 
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:11 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
5th year guys in general
He also specifically said only guys who would be eligible under the new SEC rules (so no NFL guys)
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:12 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
At this point, I don't think anyone is opposed to "5 year players" per se. What folks are opposed to are players that signed contracts with pro team, players that practiced with pro teams and players that played pre-season games with pro teams coming back to college for a 5th year...
So he and you are ok with breaking some NCAA eligibility rules just not others.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:13 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
So he and you are ok with breaking some NCAA eligibility just not others.
LSU fans keep screaming they haven't broken any rules, so curious how you now think LSU hasn't broken any rules but Ole Miss would be
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:14 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
So he and you are ok with breaking some NCAA eligibility rules just not others.
DIRECTLY from the article.
quote:
“To me, there are some fifth-years that, through whatever mechanism, whether it’s a TRO or an injunction, have become eligible, but they never signed a pro contract,” Carter added,
Exactly what I said. Most folks don't opposed 5th pear players. Covid already opened that box. They opposed players that have been associated with pro teams coming back to college. Geeze you folks are dense.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:14 pm to Adam Banks
Rules weren’t rules two weeks ago.
Now there are rules that the SEC will try to penalize you if you play a player that was ruled ineligible and the courts said otherwise.
Now there are rules that the SEC will try to penalize you if you play a player that was ruled ineligible and the courts said otherwise.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:14 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:They wouldn’t have done any of that if they knew they were eligible for a 5th year.
What folks are opposed to are players that signed contracts with pro team, players that practiced with pro teams and players that played pre-season games with pro teams coming back to college for a 5th year...
No leadership was transparent with them.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:16 pm to OleVaught14
If the SEC allows ineligible players to play then we should get ineligible players.
I will happily have the SEC institute heavy fines and sanctions for playing ANY player deemed by the NCAA ineligible and know that lane would too.
Until then we should pursue every avenue to operate as our competition is.
My question is would you be happy with the same rule?
I will happily have the SEC institute heavy fines and sanctions for playing ANY player deemed by the NCAA ineligible and know that lane would too.
Until then we should pursue every avenue to operate as our competition is.
My question is would you be happy with the same rule?
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:17 pm to The Pirate King
I already said I can’t believe ole miss is the ones trying to shame another school for being dirty. They’ve been dirty since tunsil
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:18 pm to RT1941
LSU fans prove time and time again to completely lack any and all reading comprehension and logical thought
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:18 pm to The Pirate King
Whale, whale, whale….
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:18 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Exactly what I said. Most folks don't opposed 5th pear players. Covid already opened that box. They opposed players that have been associated with pro teams coming back to college. Geeze you folks are dense.
5 for 5 specifically does not apply to the 2022 class.
This is per the NCAA.
The players that he and you are discussing are ineligible by the ncaa.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:19 pm to baytiger11
quote:
They wouldn’t have done any of that if they knew they were eligible for a 5th year.
You can speculate, but you cannot say that definitively.
The NCAA INTENTIONALLY didn't make the 5-for-5 rule retroactive. So the 2022 class had already exhausted its eligibility under the old 4-for-5 rules in 2025-26, and the NCAA's transition rule explicitly says those athletes get no additional eligibility. The new rule applies to the appropriate incoming/current classes, not retroactively to everyone who had already finished.
So “they wouldn't have done any of that if they knew they were eligible” is backwards. They weren't eligible under the rules in effect when they made those decisions, and the NCAA explicitly decided the new 5-for-5 rules would not apply to them.
Popular
Back to top


17










