Started By
Message

re: Notre Dame takes shots at Brian Kelly for no reason?

Posted on 6/4/25 at 1:58 pm to
Posted by BigLeague
Member since Jun 2025
81 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 1:58 pm to
Because Brian Kelly is a loser who got a kid killed. He deserves to be smeared as much as possible.
Posted by Imber
Member since Sep 2017
17357 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Sidewalk please for the love of God stop regurgitating the same damn shite over and over and over.


Why? Because you don't like to hear the truth? If people stop starting the same tired threads regurgitating the same tired shite on a daily basis you won't get the same answer.
Posted by John Casey
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2016
3664 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:04 pm to
I don't think I've ever wanted a team be bad more than I want Notre Dame to be bad, this upcoming season.

The glazing of Marcus Freeman, who I actually like, is starting to get pretty unbearable.

He had one great season out of 3 and all of a sudden he's considered a top 5 coach in the game. It's absurd.
Posted by BigLeague
Member since Jun 2025
81 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:07 pm to
Translation: I can't believe we chose BK over Freeman. I can't believe we got Aggied.

LSU fans folks. They don't call them Loser U for nothing.

Will BK finally win his season opener this year? Most overrated coach I've ever seen in any sport in my lifetime and that's saying a lot.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
66064 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

For sure. I think it was a good fit for both schools. BK was experienced and well-equipped to take over an LSU program that O had, frankly, been running into the ground, whereas Freeman was a first-time HC taking over an established program that BK had kept pretty stable throughout the years.

I think it would have been a real disaster if LSU had hired a first-time HC (at least for the first few years) based on the state of their program at the time.


I think it was the best option available at the time, much like DeBoer for you guys.

BK now needs to take the next step, the landscape was changing kind of as he was hired and LSU took a bit to adjust, they finally bought a decent roster this year.

Regarding Notre Dame, the truth is probably somewhat in the middle, as it usually is.

Freeman is a good coach. He also benefited from being left a solid program. I also think Notre Dame was shocked by Kelly's departure and gave Freeman more tools to succeed, an example is making Denbrock the highest paid OC.

Notre Dame is in a "better spot" now, getting a new voice after a long time is usually the right move. They're also investing more into the program now.

I don't buy this narrative that Freeman is a top 5 coach currently though or that Notre Dame is suddenly "in contention" or drastically better than they were. If you look at it objectively, they did the same thing in 2024 that they've been doing.

They performed decently vs teams with non elite skill talent (especially in the passing game), and got dominated when they ran into someone that had that type of skill talent.

And I wouldn't regard 2024 Ohio State as even that great of a team when you look at them vs teams that Kelly lost to in the CFP.
Posted by Darindawg
Member since May 2022
3776 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

The Irish win big games now.


Ooooh yeah, they win big games now.

Well, lets see, they've also got embarrassed against some highschool teams in Freeman's 3 seasons there....

Last year, they lost to a Northern Illinois team that ended up with 5 losses in the freakin MAC conference.

In 2022, they first lost to a Marshall team that ended up with 4 losses in that bastion of football greatness, the Sunbelt conference.

Then later in the season, they wet the bed against a Stanford team that finished the season 3-9, with a whopping 1-8 record in PAC-12 play.

This post was edited on 6/4/25 at 2:20 pm
Posted by John Casey
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2016
3664 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Translation: I can't believe we chose BK over Freeman. I can't believe we got Aggied.


Not even close.

Freeman would have been a disaster at LSU, following Orgeron, and someone like Kelly, with his experience, was needed to stabilize the program. Now, heading into 2025 season, there are no more excuses for Kelly at LSU. He's got an experienced QB and a talented roster. It's put up or shut up time.

I think Freeman is a good, young coach. I just don't think he has a Top 5 coach resume, yet, like all national sports media are claiming, this offseason. He needs to show he can do it for more than one season at Notre Dame.
This post was edited on 6/4/25 at 2:15 pm
Posted by BigLeague
Member since Jun 2025
81 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:17 pm to
You are right actually. Beating UGA isn't that big of a deal now now that Bowers, Stetson, Ladd and even Carson are gone. Takes some of the fun away from when you visit Knoxville next year but it is what it is. Gunner what's his name looks like garbage.
Posted by Gen Patton
Member since Dec 2009
1831 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

I think it was the best option available at the time, much like DeBoer for you guys. BK now needs to take the next step, the landscape was changing kind of as he was hired and LSU took a bit to adjust, they finally bought a decent roster this year. Regarding Notre Dame, the truth is probably somewhat in the middle, as it usually is. Freeman is a good coach. He also benefited from being left a solid program. I also think Notre Dame was shocked by Kelly's departure and gave Freeman more tools to succeed, an example is making Denbrock the highest paid OC. Notre Dame is in a "better spot" now, getting a new voice after a long time is usually the right move. They're also investing more into the program now. I don't buy this narrative that Freeman is a top 5 coach currently though or that Notre Dame is suddenly "in contention" or drastically better than they were. If you look at it objectively, they did the same thing in 2024 that they've been doing. They performed decently vs teams with non elite skill talent (especially in the passing game), and got dominated when they ran into someone that had that type of skill talent. And I wouldn't regard 2024 Ohio State as even that great of a team when you look at them vs teams that Kelly lost to in the CFP.


This sums up my perspective of the situation perfectly
Posted by Darindawg
Member since May 2022
3776 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Beating UGA isn't that big of a deal now now that Bowers, Stetson, Ladd and even Carson are gone.


You can try to rub this in my face if it makes you feel better I guess, but uh....we still mopped the floor in our annual prison-raping of the Vols last season even without Bowers, Bennett and Ladd.
Posted by bayou85
Concordia
Member since Sep 2016
10735 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Kelly was good at Notre Dame but when it came time to be great he always folded


He lost to 2012 Bama, 2018 Clemson, 2020 clemson and 2020 Bama in the playoffs. 2024 ND wouldn't have beaten any of those teams. And honestly, 2012 Bama, 2018 Clemson and 2020 Bama will probably never happen again with NIL.
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
19666 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:32 pm to
This is one of those rare instances where it worked out for both sides. LSU fans love having Brian Kelly as their head coach. Notre Dame fans love not having Brian Kelly as their head coach.
Posted by BigLeague
Member since Jun 2025
81 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:34 pm to
You won't have mr. no read too scared to to sling it freshman Nico to keep your overrated asses in the game on the road this year and you know it.
This post was edited on 6/4/25 at 2:35 pm
Posted by Darindawg
Member since May 2022
3776 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

overrated asses


I wouldn't be calling a team 'overrated' that has broke one off in my team the size of John Holme's impressive member 8 STRAIGHT TIMES and is currently your own team's conference champions. But that's just me.

Posted by DBird
Member since Nov 2023
812 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Why? Because you don't like to hear the truth? If people stop starting the same tired threads regurgitating the same tired shite on a daily basis you won't get the same answer.


He doesn't need a co-signor Imber. I didn't start the thread, you LSU bitches get so defensive.
Posted by DBird
Member since Nov 2023
812 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

yes it’s quite common to lose 55% of a roster off an SEC team


We did
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107935 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

The fact Freeman got his team to the playoff and beat Georgia in the process is why the ND beat writers are writing such an article. Kelly was good at Notre Dame but when it came time to be great he always folded.
Kelly also lost a national title game at ND….
Posted by JayAg
Member since Jun 2021
15409 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 3:03 pm to
You white knighting LSU is a twist I wasn’t expecting.
Posted by kajunman
Member since Dec 2015
7888 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 3:08 pm to
Kelly is not a great coach. Freeman is young and has the chance to be great. Kelly is an average to good coach, nothing more. I was very disappointed when LSU hired him.

I'm not impressed with Woodward either. The length of contracts he gives is stupid.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
66064 posts
Posted on 6/4/25 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

He doesn't need a co-signor Imber. I didn't start the thread, you LSU bitches get so defensive.


Not sure why you're getting all pissed about the "same responses" when we literally get some version of this sad troll thread at least once a week and sometimes more.

Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 57
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 57Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter