Started By
Message

No Clear Winner SEC / LSU

Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:27 am
Posted by TigerChick2018
Mobile, AL
Member since Jun 2018
416 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:27 am
Both sides blinked. There are no clear winners here. Each side is going to declare themselves the winner, I suppose. However, the outstanding legal issues still have to be resolved and player eligibility and all SEC and NCAA rules must be applied equally across the board. We all know that’s not happening now and it has not been happening for decades.
Posted by LSUZombie
A Cemetery Near You
Member since Apr 2008
29858 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:28 am to
LSU said from the beginning they would follow the rules.

They followed the rules.

SEC threw a fit for optics. Got bodied by ESPN and the national media. Retreated.

LSU states the issue is moot.

Victory for LSU
Posted by Tuscaloosa
16x Award Winning Internet user
Member since Dec 2011
50718 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:28 am to
Lol

16x
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5822 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:29 am to
You're right, after watching how everything played out, it's clear that the SEC has damaged itself as much or more than it damaged LSU. Conference relations have always been testy, but now that everybody knows the new rules of engagement we're entering a modern era of dirty pool.
Posted by OscarTheGrouch
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2006
6020 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:30 am to
16*
Posted by NFLSU
Screwston, Texas
Member since Oct 2014
21986 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:30 am to
How’s PeePaw?

Awake for that 11AM season opener?

Posted by TigerChick2018
Mobile, AL
Member since Jun 2018
416 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:31 am to
Let’s be intellectually honest. LSU did in fact blink when even though the two players in question obtained a court order permitting them to play LSU still did not roster those players. LSU then went on to fill the roster without those two players. Call it what you will, but that was a blink. I do not fault LSU for that in any way shape or form because the program has to come first.

This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 9:33 am
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
17549 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Both sides blinked. There are no clear winners here.



Perhaps when the 2 NFL players left at the altar will feel differently. Yogi said it best: "It ain't over til it's over."

“Louisiana plaintiffs' attorney Ryan Downton tells Yahoo Sports he would ask the Court to hold LSU in contempt if the school decides against adding the players. The judge enjoined LSU in the order, presumably preventing the university from actions that adversely impact players.” Ross Dellenger reported

Posted by SECCaptain
Member since Jun 2025
2764 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:33 am to
LSU is the clear loser either way given they're part of the SEC
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
42938 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:33 am to
We are all losers in this drama


SEC is headed in the wrong direction
Posted by TigerChick2018
Mobile, AL
Member since Jun 2018
416 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:33 am to
We will know soon enough. I think the one thing everyone can agree on is that this saga is not over yet, nor should it be. This needs resolution for every member of the SEC as well as the NCAA.

Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
41666 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:34 am to
quote:

You're right, after watching how everything played out, it's clear that the SEC has damaged itself as much or more than it damaged LSU. Conference relations have always been testy, but now that everybody knows the new rules of engagement we're entering a modern era of dirty pool.



I still cannot figure out how there are pros on other teams via TRO’s and the SEC thinks that LSU owns a law firm in Colorado/Texas/Kentucky/Missouri that promulgated this.

There are teams that reached out to Wright before LSU did.

I think you’re seeing retribution for LSU taking Lane from a lesser program and yall fell sorry for them.

Then you saw lane outwork Tennessee for Leavitt.

Then you saw LSU embarrass a program like Clemson and get this new fear that LSU could operate like Alabama did with Saban.

But they disguised it all as LSU’s legal team started this whole TRO business and we will expel them for playing these players (which LSU DID NOT PLAY THEM).


You can prove me wrong. Go ahead.
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 9:46 am
Posted by Night Vision
33rd Level REC Member
Member since Feb 2018
24955 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:34 am to
Oh there was a winner and it wasn't LSU.

Posted by TigerChick2018
Mobile, AL
Member since Jun 2018
416 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:39 am to
Explain.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
16x Award Winning Internet user
Member since Dec 2011
50718 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:41 am to
quote:

NFLSU


Lmaaaaaoooooooooooooooo



16x
Posted by bluestem75
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2007
5435 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:41 am to
quote:

bamameister


The players’ lawyer has said they will sue the SEC and the NCAA and not LSU. Bama needs to get ready to pay its share.

The SEC is still in violation of the court order by preventing LSU from rostering the players and threatening them with punishment if they did over a rule LSU never broke.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8795 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:43 am to
quote:

“Louisiana plaintiffs' attorney Ryan Downton tells Yahoo Sports he would ask the Court to hold LSU in contempt if the school decides against adding the players. The judge enjoined LSU in the order, presumably preventing the university from actions that adversely impact players.” Ross Dellenger reported



Couldn't these guys have tried to make another NFL practice squad but didn't for the fact that they were told by Lane they would make his roster? LSU about to get sued by these guys?
Posted by frogpond11
Member since Apr 2023
231 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:44 am to
The federal case continued.. ie...not gonna happen, never was. Didn't make any sense from the start.

SEC not voting to expel LSU.. wasn't ever gonna happen.

And those 2 players are about to sue the pants off of the SEC and Sankey.

LSU did nothing wrong.

SEC will pay a hefty price for their childish fits and stupidity.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5822 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:45 am to
The SEC's behavior in this matter has been inconsistent with a tone of maliciousness from the start. Every message has been qualitatively different, with varying degrees of inaccurate and subjective. Making and/or re-interpreting rules on the fly. Conducting an intimidation campaign through the media and the courts? Using a fricking joke by a well known joker as evidence of Loss of Institutional control? The knives are out now; forget cooperation when everybody's watching their back. The NCAA is inept, but the SEC has rewritten the book on bad crisis management.
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 9:47 am
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
17549 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:46 am to
quote:

The players’ lawyer has said they will sue the SEC and the NCAA and not LSU. Bama needs to get ready to pay its share.



I quoted you what he said. The players don't have to do anything, quite frankly. The BR judge can hold LSU in contempt because they are not in compliance with the verdict. Which was more than just a suggestion.

Of course, that would mean that the Judge would have to have an ounce of integrity for his own court and stop carrying out the bidding of Huey Long and his henchmen.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter