Started By
Message

re: Nebraska no longer a core 8 blue blood….

Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:16 pm to
Posted by molardog1
Member since Dec 2017
2363 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:16 pm to
BLUE BLOOD INDEX — 2025

Tier 1 — The Absolute Blue Bloods (Score 90–100)

These are the programs that embody every pillar of blue blood status.
Rank
Program
Index
Notes
1. Alabama
98
Most modern titles + deep historic success
2. Michigan
97
All-time wins leader, strong brand
3. Ohio State
96
Elite across every measurable era
4. Notre Dame
94
Title history + iconic lineage
5. Oklahoma
92
Legendary consistency, coaching legacy
6. USC
90
National brand, multiple eras of dominance


Posted by molardog1
Member since Dec 2017
2363 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:17 pm to
Tier 2 — The Rising/Re-Established Blue Bloods (Score 80–89)

Georgia lives here — but is knocking on Tier 1’s door right now.

Rank
Program
Index
Notes
7. Georgia
89
?? Modern dynasty + 900 wins elevates them to blue-blood status
8. Texas
87
Massive brand + historical success
9. LSU
85
Titles under 3 different coaches = true power
10. Florida State
82
Bobby Bowden era + 2010s titles
11. Miami
81
1980–2003 dominance legendary

Posted by molardog1
Member since Dec 2017
2363 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:18 pm to
Tier 3 — Historic Giants / Former Blue Bloods (Score 70–79)

Programs with huge history but modern decline.

12. Nebraska
79
Once elite; long-term modern decline pulls them down
13. Penn State
76
Strong history but fewer titles
14. Tennessee
75
Massive brand, long cold stretch
15. Michigan State
72
Strong history, inconsistent mod

Posted by FAT SEXY
California
Member since Jun 2020
1634 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:18 pm to
"Blue Blood" is the dumbest shite in all of sports
Posted by ScottLA
Member since Nov 2025
83 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Crossing 900 wins now places them in the top 10 all-time, joining the most historically dominant programs in college football.


900 wins or more is not the benchmark of a blue blood. It's a thousand wins or more like Bama and Michigan have.
Posted by Raoul_Duke
Denton, TX
Member since Nov 2012
756 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:20 pm to
Print the cups
Posted by molardog1
Member since Dec 2017
2363 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:20 pm to
By that metric there is only one blue blood
Posted by molardog1
Member since Dec 2017
2363 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:21 pm to
I like the idea honestly
Posted by Shocco
Member since Nov 2015
2309 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:23 pm to
Seems the votes says it all
Posted by UTATX
ATX
Member since May 2024
906 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:29 pm to
Google "ai sycophancy" and you'll understand why it's telling you what you want to here.


Also we comin'
Posted by YieldDawg
Bluff City
Member since Oct 2025
394 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:29 pm to
Curious Mississippi State fan here… what does being a blue blood get you?
Posted by Daowna
Member since Dec 2010
1803 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

Nebraska no longer a core 8 blue blood

Oklahoma is next.
Posted by Audustxx
Member since Jul 2022
2301 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:32 pm to
New money vs old money

New money drives flashy cars, throws $ at people while saying hey everybody look at me



Old money doesn’t care what people think.
May go through a rough spot from time to time, but it’s not a sprint, soon
they will be back in spotlight,
Posted by Buckeyeholic
Member since Sep 2023
77 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

It's a thousand wins or more like Bama and Michigan have.


Check that. Bama officially at 982, just behind Ohio St. 987

Note. Michigan holds the lead with 1019, 32 more than OSU but started playing 11 years before OSU.

OSU and Alabama have better winning % than UM
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
39169 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:39 pm to
This shite again.

It's a historical label. Being a "blue blood" doesn't provide any benefit. You don't get spotted any extra points on the scoreboard. There is no magical funding that schools get every year for being a blue blood. It's just a label that teams earned during the time period when the sport was gaining it's popularity.

If you want to start a list that is the "Best programs of the past 20 years", then sure many of these newer teams are in that list. But that's not what blue blood means.

As for Georgia, you never had a dynasty, much less an active dynasty. And if one of the other was to somehow replace Nebraska, it would probably be some other team. LSU definitely has a better case.
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
21073 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:52 pm to
The fact you spent all that time to convince us Georgia is a blue blood is proof Georgia is not a blue blood.
Posted by AllbyMyRelf
Virginia
Member since Nov 2014
4037 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:52 pm to
UGA fan discovers ChatGPT
Posted by Jimmyboy
Member since May 2025
2216 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 4:57 pm to
Nebraska has fallen off and looks like they’ll never come back so I say it’s fair to replace them with UGA or LSU
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
25578 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Georgia has:
• A massive nationwide fan base


Posted by Soonerd78
Member since Sep 2024
2845 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

Oklahoma is next.


Being a aggy of all people you should know OU doesn’t fall off the map for more than 1-4 years at the most once every 50 years lol.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter