AllbyMyRelf
| Favorite team: | Mississippi St. |
| Location: | Virginia |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | Economics |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 4268 |
| Registered on: | 11/1/2014 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Weakness/lack of proprioception in left side
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 7/13/26 at 11:19 am to hall59tiger
When you say weakness, do you just mean there’s an imbalance and your left side isn’t quite as strong, or do you notice an actual deficit on your left side? If the latter, it might be prudent to check with a neurologist to see if there’s some neurological factor involved.
Any numbness or tingling?
Any numbness or tingling?
re: “They’ll never be in the same room again” - Miss & Ms St. CWS Trophies
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 7/11/26 at 12:55 pm to hsgeoboy
Neat
re: On3.com one writer predicts final standings for SEC football 2026
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 7/9/26 at 4:07 pm to TrueLefty
Pretty obvious State will finish in the top 3.
re: If State fires Lebby this season, do they go after Mullen?
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 7/7/26 at 7:48 pm to Landmass
Probably Lane Kiffin
re: Who will have the best backfield in the SEC this season?
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 7/6/26 at 1:16 pm to Darindawg
Probably Mississippi State
re: The mystery of skyrocketing home prices has been solved
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 7/6/26 at 7:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:May be the nicest thing you’ve said to people on here
Eliminating 30% of the increase isn't going to do much, especially with the stratification of the impact over the types of properties involved...at least for your typical demos on this site.
re: With all these School Ranking Lists, I’ll Add This
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/30/26 at 8:19 pm to pgaddxn
quote:yes you can
If you wanted to study petroleum engineering you cannot do much better than LSU.
re: What State Holds the Unique Distinction of Having
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/30/26 at 3:19 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:No one who has to deal with MD drivers with any frequency thinks they’re ok
OK drivers VA WV MD
re: SCOTUS Opinion Day - June 29
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/29/26 at 2:41 pm to Ailsa
quote:I don’t think you all should expect birthright citizenship to be ended. I think you’re setting yourselves up for disappointment. I think it’ll be 9-0 or 7-2 upholding BRC.
Tomorrow, they probably catch a throat-punch via the ending of birthright citizenship
re: Southern Business and Law School Rankings
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/28/26 at 8:26 am to rebeloke
Not if you do big law
re: Mamdani preaching Islam in New York City Hall
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/25/26 at 10:23 am to Champagne
quote:That’s what Adrian Vermeule wants to do, but with Catholic integralism.
So you want the USA to amend the First Amendment, removing the Establishment of Religion Clause, and then you want the FedGov to pass laws that actively promote your Reformed Covenanter Church religion to the exclusion of all other denominations and religions? That's exactly what John Calvin did in Switzerland! He established a Governmental Theocracy. I don't see how that could work out.
But also I don’t think removing the establishment clause makes you a theocracy. Otherwise the UK would be a theocracy with its established Church of England. Even England of the 1500s I wouldn’t describe as a theocracy—but maybe you disagree
re: The Law by Frédéric Bastiat
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/24/26 at 2:19 pm to 4cubbies
If you haven’t read it already, I think you would benefit from Harold Demsetz’s article, “Toward a Theory of Property Rights”.
It’s really good. JSTOR link below.
Demsetz
It’s really good. JSTOR link below.
Demsetz
re: The Law by Frédéric Bastiat
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/24/26 at 1:47 pm to 4cubbies
quote:Let’s say someone is cut out of the will. We can still dispose of the property as set forth in the will. The person cut out is no worse off than they would be if the property was destroyed.
Humans are selfish, irrational and vindictive. Potential logical heirs are often intentionally immitted from wills, resulting in intense conflict and litigation.
re: The Law by Frédéric Bastiat
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/24/26 at 1:20 pm to 4cubbies
quote:I can’t agree with that. Inheritance rules are a solution to conflict by clearly outlining who gets what, thus reducing extraneous claims to the property, all while preserving the property.
If the stated goal is conflict avoidance, destruction of property seems to be the best way forward.
Your destruction rule makes everyone poorer while solving no obvious problem.
re: The Law by Frédéric Bastiat
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/24/26 at 1:07 pm to 4cubbies
quote:Why would the destruction of wealth be the best way forward? We have a path of disposition that preserves the value of the property while also being relatively low cost to implement (wills and intestacy laws)
Maybe just destroying the property is the best way to avoid/alleviate societal conflict?
re: Predictions on the next SEC school to win the football national title?
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/24/26 at 11:59 am to PSS101
Probably Mississippi State this year, if I had to guess.
re: The Law by Frédéric Bastiat
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/23/26 at 2:00 pm to 4cubbies
quote:I think they exist narrowly to the extent people owe duties to another. For example, if someone’s duty is to provide for their family, then I think they have a right to work and obtain property so they can fulfill that duty.
So you are NOT a proponent of natural rights?
But no, I do not hold to the natural rights concepts that you see in liberal enlightenment philosophy.
re: The Law by Frédéric Bastiat
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/23/26 at 1:56 pm to LSUnKaty
quote:Agreed
Granted — but doesn't the prohibition on using others as mere means ultimately rest on the fact that they have a claim to their own body and the products of their labor that you cannot override?
quote:Can’t immediately think of a scenario where I disagree, so agreed.
Whether you ground that claim in self-ownership or in the idea that each person belongs to God and therefore cannot belong to you, the practical conclusion is identical: no one has the right to direct another person's existence toward their own ends.
quote:Mostly agreed, except the reason I engaged on this topic is because I disagreed with how natural rights were being portrayed/ justified.
From a political philosophy standpoint the two views converge almost entirely. The meaningful divergence is narrow — suicide, and perhaps a few other cases where a person's choices affect only themselves. That's a real disagreement, but it doesn't touch the core of what we've been discussing. On property rights, plunder, and the wrongness of slavery, we're describing the same structure from different foundations.
re: The Law by Frédéric Bastiat
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/23/26 at 1:44 pm to stuntman
Yes, but philosophically speaking, wills are pretty much universally known, and the intestacy laws are public and available. So can we not just deem that people that die without their own will knowingly accept the default?
re: The Law by Frédéric Bastiat
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/23/26 at 1:39 pm to stuntman
Everyone has a will. The question is whether they made it themselves or if they’re using the default set forth by legislators in the intestacy code.
re: The Law by Frédéric Bastiat
Posted by AllbyMyRelf on 6/23/26 at 1:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Why do I have to accept the idea of self ownership?
He backed you into a corner, and you just "put the walls up"
ETA1: How is presupposing self-ownership different than presupposing God?
ETA2: Him: “slavery is wrong because X”
Me: “I think slavery is wrong because Y”
You: “aha! You’re putting up walls! You’re not allowed to use Y!”
Popular
1







