Started By
Message
NCAA Basketball - NET rankings and performance through 2-22
Posted on 2/23/25 at 11:35 am
Posted on 2/23/25 at 11:35 am
NET Rankings
1. Auburn
2. Duke
3. Houston
4. Florida
5. Tennessee
6. Alabama
7. Texas Tech
8. Iowa State
9. Arizona
10. Gonzaga (laughable)
12. Kentucky
16. Missouri
18. Texas A&M
24. Ole Miss
28. Mississippi State
38. Texas
40. Arkansas
41. Georgia
43. Vanderbilt
51. Oklahoma
81. LSU
89. South Carolina
Q1 Wins
14 - Auburn
9 - Alabama
9 - Tennessee
8 - Kentucky
7 - Mississippi State
6 - Missouri
6 - Texas A&M
5 - Florida
5 - Oklahoma
5 - Ole Miss
4 - Arkansas
4 - Texas
3 - Vanderbilt
2 - Georgia
2 - LSU
1 - South Carolina
Q1+2 Wins
19 - Auburn
16 - Alabama
14 - Florida
14 - Texas A&M
12 - Tennessee
11 - Mississippi State
10 - Ole Miss
9 - Kentucky
9 - Missouri
7 - Oklahoma
7 - Texas
7 - Vanderbilt
5 - Arkansas
5 - Georgia
4 - LSU
2 - South Carolina
Q3+4 Losses
1 - Oklahoma
1 - South Carolina
1. Auburn
2. Duke
3. Houston
4. Florida
5. Tennessee
6. Alabama
7. Texas Tech
8. Iowa State
9. Arizona
10. Gonzaga (laughable)
12. Kentucky
16. Missouri
18. Texas A&M
24. Ole Miss
28. Mississippi State
38. Texas
40. Arkansas
41. Georgia
43. Vanderbilt
51. Oklahoma
81. LSU
89. South Carolina
Q1 Wins
14 - Auburn
9 - Alabama
9 - Tennessee
8 - Kentucky
7 - Mississippi State
6 - Missouri
6 - Texas A&M
5 - Florida
5 - Oklahoma
5 - Ole Miss
4 - Arkansas
4 - Texas
3 - Vanderbilt
2 - Georgia
2 - LSU
1 - South Carolina
Q1+2 Wins
19 - Auburn
16 - Alabama
14 - Florida
14 - Texas A&M
12 - Tennessee
11 - Mississippi State
10 - Ole Miss
9 - Kentucky
9 - Missouri
7 - Oklahoma
7 - Texas
7 - Vanderbilt
5 - Arkansas
5 - Georgia
4 - LSU
2 - South Carolina
Q3+4 Losses
1 - Oklahoma
1 - South Carolina
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 11:36 am
Posted on 2/23/25 at 11:38 am to SummerOfGeorge
KenPom Strength of Schedule to Date
1. Alabama
2. Auburn
3. Kentucky
7. Texas A&M
10. Mississippi State
15. Tennessee
17. Arkansas
18. South Carolina
19. Ole Miss
27. Oklahoma
31. Georgia
34. Texas
35. LSU
37. Vanderbilt
41. Florida
46. Missouri
1. Alabama
2. Auburn
3. Kentucky
7. Texas A&M
10. Mississippi State
15. Tennessee
17. Arkansas
18. South Carolina
19. Ole Miss
27. Oklahoma
31. Georgia
34. Texas
35. LSU
37. Vanderbilt
41. Florida
46. Missouri
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 11:40 am
Posted on 2/23/25 at 1:01 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Have a feeling tennessee will pass bama for a 1 seed before all is done.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 1:05 pm to Scoper
Seeds don't matter as much any more as long as you are a 12 of better.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 1:18 pm to TheFourHorsemen
They matter. Tennessee will be sent to Duke’s bracket as it stands due to an outdated rule that can’t account for a conference having so many top seeds. Not only is that geographically the 3rd preference, you also get Duke as the 1, who is probably the best team right now.
I’m curious what they do if Duke gets the 1st overall seed and SEC holds on to 2/3/4/5 overall seeds. Then it’s 2 conflicting seeding rules since the 1 overall seed shouldn’t be seeded with the top 2 seed.
I’m curious what they do if Duke gets the 1st overall seed and SEC holds on to 2/3/4/5 overall seeds. Then it’s 2 conflicting seeding rules since the 1 overall seed shouldn’t be seeded with the top 2 seed.
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 2/23/25 at 1:57 pm to TheFourHorsemen
quote:
Seeds don't matter as much any more as long as you are a 12 of better.
That's only the case for bubble teams looking to secure an at large bid. For the higher seeded teams with realistic goals of getting to the Final 4 the seeding very much matters.
If your team is a potential 1 or 2 seed currently and has a remaining schedule that is difficult or demanding and you want them to have the best chance of advancing to at least the Elite 8 and hopefully the Final 4 then you want to make sure they drop no further than to a 3 seed. This guarantees that your team won't potentially face the #1 seed until the Elite 8 (if your team advances that far) and worst case scenario will potentially face the #2 seed instead of the #1 seed in the Sweet 16. Not only does a 3 seed allow a team to avoid the #1 seed until the Elite 8 it allows a 2nd realistic opportunity for an 9, 8, 5, or 4 seed to knock off the #1 seed in the round of 32 or the Sweet 16. Realistically speaking, a 1 or 2 seed losing to a 15 or 16 seed is very rare so 1 and 2 seeds only have 2 realistic opportunities (instead of 3) of being knocked off before reaching the Elite 8.
To your point, if you're not going to be a 1, 2, or 3 seed and your goal is to have the best chance to advance to the Sweet 16 or even the Elite 8 it's almost better to be either a 6 seed or an 11 seed because although you will have a more challenging 1st round game you're far more likely to have a slightly easier 2nd round game against a 3 seed compared to the 2nd round game you'll likely have if your team is a 7, 8, 9, or 10 seed.
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 2/23/25 at 2:40 pm to Govt Tide
Seeds only matter for the top SEC teams. Alabama, Auburn, and Florida. The rest will get a lower seed that most likely keep them out of the second weekend.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 2:46 pm to LewEvansFan
quote:
They matter. Tennessee will be sent to Duke’s bracket as it stands due to an outdated rule that can’t account for a conference having so many top seeds. Not only is that geographically the 3rd preference, you also get Duke as the 1, who is probably the best team right now.
Arkansas had a streak of being assigned to play a North Carolina team on a "neutral" court... that was usually within a brisk walk of that school's campus. You do not want that to happen.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 2:47 pm to Arksulli
Arkansas will be lucky to make the tournament. They need to win out and a few rounds of the SEC tournament as well.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 2:51 pm to NobodyImportant
quote:
Arkansas will be lucky to make the tournament. They need to win out and a few rounds of the SEC tournament as well.
Your username is very accurate.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 2:52 pm to NobodyImportant
Arkansas is already projected in. They not only don't need to win out, but just go 2-2.
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 2/23/25 at 2:57 pm to UltimateHog
They aren't projected in if they lose. They have to keep winning. Remember, Texas was actually projected in a couple of weeks ago 

Posted on 2/23/25 at 3:03 pm to NobodyImportant
Lmao no shite Sherlock. They need to go .500 to remain in.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 3:04 pm to Govt Tide
quote:
govt tide
I like a lot of your posts, mate.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 3:18 pm to NobodyImportant
They need to win both home games in Texas and State to get in at 7-11.
Those two games are the most important right now. Lose one or both of those games then Arkansas would need to win the SEC tournament.
Those two games are the most important right now. Lose one or both of those games then Arkansas would need to win the SEC tournament.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 3:46 pm to Scoper
quote:
Have a feeling tennessee will pass bama for a 1 seed before all is done.
Possibly, but Bama still has the 2nd highest WAB behind AU which is why Lunardi still has them as the #3 overall seed despite going 1-2 in the last 3 games (actually had us still #2 prior to yesterday which didn’t make sense to me). Not sure how much weight WAB is given vs NET, but the committee added it to the official selection criteria for a reason.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 4:04 pm to BamaBravesPackers
Joey Brackets still has us projected as a 3 seed, would like to keep that although I expect the Cats to finish 2-2 and 9-9 overall.
Would be pretty wild to finish 9-9 in the conference and get a 3 or 4 seed. Q1 wins matter.
He's got us in a 4 team pod where we would play the winner of the UofL/Arkansas (or VCU) game, not thrilled about that. Would like A&M's 3 seed pod in the West region.
Would be pretty wild to finish 9-9 in the conference and get a 3 or 4 seed. Q1 wins matter.
He's got us in a 4 team pod where we would play the winner of the UofL/Arkansas (or VCU) game, not thrilled about that. Would like A&M's 3 seed pod in the West region.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 4:08 pm to BamaBravesPackers
quote:
Possibly, but Bama still has the 2nd highest WAB behind AU which is why Lunardi still has them as the #3 overall seed despite going 1-2 in the last 3 games (actually had us still #2 prior to yesterday which didn’t make sense to me). Not sure how much weight WAB is given vs NET, but the committee added it to the official selection criteria for a reason.
He was probably very impressed with Duke dismantling Illinois.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 4:09 pm to UltimateHog
You should totally be in. No question.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 4:11 pm to Bigbens42
quote:
He was probably very impressed with Duke dismantling Illinois.
No doubt, and that was a common opponent, but we should have fallen behind Duke after the back to back losses IMO. I was expecting us to fall behind FL as well, similar to the polls. Lunardi seems to respect SOS and WAB quite a bit, and I think that’s because the committee has recently as well. Bama’s 4 seed last year was strictly based on metrics and SOS.
Popular
Back to top
