Started By
Message
re: Mizzou sitting at 53 scholarship players
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:07 am to SidewalkTiger
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:07 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
I've always said 45. Several sources have said 46. It was somewhere in that area
45 or 53, LSU could have chosen to play same as Missouri is playing. Missouri could have less on Saturday than they have now.
LSU has 104 players according to their own roster... LINK
SEC teams will need to have at least 53 scholarship players available, including a quarterback, seven offensive linemen and four defensive linemen, according to guidelines announced by the league on Friday. If a team can't meet the minimum requirements, it can choose to play anyway. Otherwise, its game will be rescheduled or declared a no contest.
Orgeron was afraid to play. Missouri's coach is not. I'm sure the players on each team will remember. They say that once you've quit the first time, it'll be easier the next time.
This post was edited on 11/19/20 at 9:12 am
3
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:16 am to SmokeTide
quote:
Except you didn't actually know and no one knew exactly what those numbers were it was never made public. Giving how you flip flop depending on if you trying to troll or defend LSU against very serious allegations you normally deflect when a poster takes you to task.
Actually I do know but whatever.
Nobody has "taken me to task."
All y'all can say is hur dur scurred.
This post was edited on 11/19/20 at 9:17 am
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:18 am to BLG
quote:This says it all. Sideways and Little Billie don't have the seeds to admit it's true.
If a team can't meet the minimum requirements, it can choose to play anyway. Otherwise, its game will be rescheduled or declared a no contest.
Orgeron was afraid to play. Missouri's coach is not. I'm sure the players on each team will remember. They say that once you've quit the first time, it'll be easier the next time.
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:18 am to BLG
quote:
45 or 53, LSU could have chosen to play same as Missouri is playing. Missouri could have less on Saturday than they have now.
Maybe, but as of now, they meet the minimum requirements, LSU, Texas A&M, and several others did not.
quote:
Orgeron was afraid to play. Missouri's coach is not.
Again, Missouri meets the minimum requirements that every SEC school agreed upon.
LSU did not, its why you saw four postponements last weekend.
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:21 am to coachcrisp
quote:
This says it all. Sideways and Little Billie don't have the seeds to admit it's true.
Bammers dont have the seeds to admit that no other SEC team has played with less than 53 scholarship players either as agreed to by the members of the conference.
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:21 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Maybe, but as of now, they meet the minimum requirements,
You totally ignore that LSU could have played. 46 or 53, doesn't make a difference
If a team can't meet the minimum requirements, it can choose to play anyway.
You also ignore that LSU has 104 players on its roster. They could have played same as Missouri is going to play.
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:22 am to BLG
quote:
You totally ignore that LSU could have played. 46 or 53, doesn't make a difference
If a team can't meet the minimum requirements, it can choose to play anyway.
You also ignore that LSU has 104 players on its roster. They could have played same as Missouri is going to play.
For the third time, Missouri has met (so far) the minimum agreed upon standards to play.
LSU did not.
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:23 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
For the third time, Missouri has met (so far) the minimum agreed upon standards to play.
LSU did not.
for the 3rd time, it doesn't matter
you're just trying to spin it away but you can not
If a team can't meet the minimum requirements, it can choose to play anyway.
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:24 am to BLG
quote:
for the 3rd time, it doesn't matter
you're just trying to spin it away but you can not
If a team can't meet the minimum requirements, it can choose to play anyway.
Why are you so mad that you couldn't play a depleted LSU team?
I don't see you crying about any other team postponing games.
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:25 am to SidewalkTiger
still trying to spin away the fact that your coach was scared to play and the Missouri coach is not.
Do you think Missouri with 53 scholarship players is a more talented team than LSU with 46 scholarship players? They both have about 100 players total.
If a team can't meet the minimum requirements, it can choose to play anyway.
Do you think Missouri with 53 scholarship players is a more talented team than LSU with 46 scholarship players? They both have about 100 players total.
If a team can't meet the minimum requirements, it can choose to play anyway.
This post was edited on 11/19/20 at 9:28 am
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:28 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Why are you so mad that you couldn't play a depleted LSU team?
I don't see you crying about any other team postponing games.
Every time somebody paints you into a corner, the old why you mad? bullshite comes out. You're so full of shite, your eyes are brown.
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:28 am to BLG
quote:
If a team can't meet the minimum requirements, it can choose to play anyway.
Yes, so why do you think a coach shouldn't give his team the best chance to compete?
Why should LSU play a game with only 45 scholly players and missing all of their long snappers, tight ends, most of their receivers, and only having one quarterback?
Why would a coach do that?
This post was edited on 11/19/20 at 9:32 am
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:29 am to coachcrisp
quote:
Every time somebody paints you into a corner, the old why you mad? bull shite comes out. You're so full of shite, your eyes are brown
So why are yall mad?
Yall have been crying about not getting to play depleted LSU for a week and a half now.
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:31 am to SidewalkTiger
We're not crying...we're making fun of LSU!
And you know it.
And you know it.
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:31 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Why should LSU play a game with only 45 scholly players and missing all of their long snappers, tight ends, most of their receivers, and only having one quarterback?
Why would a coach do that?
This is a really simple answer most of the time, to get better
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:32 am to rockiee
quote:
This is a really simple answer most of the time, to get better
How do you get better by playing walk ons and multiple players out of position? Especially against a good team?
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:33 am to coachcrisp
quote:
We're not crying...we're making fun of LSU!
Why?
For doing the exact same thing everyone else has done?
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:35 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Yes, so why do you think a coach shouldn't give his team the best chance to compete competitively?
because it's scheduled game.
Why should any team ever play if they aren't assured they will win the game?
Why did Alabama play last year with so many injuries?
Why is Missouri playing though they will be down to 53 or less scholarship players? I'm pretty sure it's because the team wants to play and the coach isn't a coward.
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:35 am to BurgTiger
Why does your staff have so little control over your obviously irresponsible players?
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:35 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
How do you get better by playing walk ons and multiple players out of position?
Because not every position is going to be playing back ups, it can also build depth.
Page 3 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News