Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:27 pm to saltydawg
quote:
Georgia voting to keep Auburn in the West = Fear of Auburn?
Uhhh... duh?
Didn't want Auburn competing with them for the same spot in the SECCG.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:27 pm to blzr
quote:
All afraid of Auburn
I would agree except UGA plays Auburn every year anyway.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:27 pm to volfan30
Moving them to the East to keep that stupid Tennessee-Alabama game going ? Wonderful. If 1971 ever comes back that game might mean something again.
Never understood why if that game meant so much those two goobers couldn't just play it as a non-conference game each year.
Never understood why if that game meant so much those two goobers couldn't just play it as a non-conference game each year.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:27 pm to CNB
quote:
It's yearly anyways
Thanks for answering my rhetorical question
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:28 pm to saltydawg
So did auburn not vote because they wanted to go to the east?
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:28 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Fact. Hard to argue anything else either.
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:28 pm to saltydawg
quote:
Thanks for answering my rhetorical question
I didn't read. Whoops
I'm too sober for this.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:30 pm to CNB
quote:Ok - crap. Scratch that
That makes no sense. Had Missouri joined the West - 2 West teams would have had to move to the East, i.e., Alabama and Auburn.
Wait..what?
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:31 pm to saltydawg
quote:
Georgia voting to keep Auburn in the West = Fear of Auburn?
It is if you would rather have Missouri in your division over Auburn.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:31 pm to I-59 Tiger
Guess we can do away with that stupid tradition of Lsu wearing away jerseys at home too if they ever do away with Bama/Tenn.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:32 pm to I-59 Tiger
quote:
Moving them to the East to keep that stupid Tennessee-Alabama game going ?
I would hate to lose the AU-UGA rivalry, so I respect the Bama-UT rivalry
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:34 pm to Diamondawg
[quote]That makes no sense. Had Missouri joined the West - 2 West teams would have had to move to the East, i.e., Alabama and Auburn.
6+1=7 is the same as 1+6=7, ok now you try.
6+1=7 is the same as 1+6=7, ok now you try.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:35 pm to blzr
quote:
Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, and Florida
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All afraid of Auburn
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:39 pm to AU86
I know Tennessee and Florida are, Auburn owns both of them for w/e reason.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:41 pm to AU86
quote:
All afraid of Auburn
yeah that's what it isPosted on 11/6/11 at 6:42 pm to ohiovol
quote:
Why didn't Florida support it?
I'm a little stumped by this too. I expected Alabama and Tennesse to vote against them joining the west, and Georgia also has direct rivalry ties to Auburn to where that makes sense, but not following Florida's decision. I'm also surpised Auburn didn't vote to push Missouri to the East.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:46 pm to Esarhaddon
All they had to do is go to a nine game conference schedule and establish two permanent cross-division rivals. Therefore bammer could have kept their precious game with UTKnox and Auburn. Auburn could have kept ThUGA because both would have been in the east and bammer as one of the cross division rivals. Auburn could have moved to the east where we belong. Missouri would have been in the west where they belong. 
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:56 pm to volfan30
Did aTm and Mizzou get to vote? If not, this could just be tabled until they are voting members. 4 may not be able to block the other 10, depends on how the conference rules are adjusted.
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 11/6/11 at 6:57 pm to ThaKaptin
quote:
Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, and Florida
Pretty much all of the cool kids
Page 2 of 3
Latest Arkansas News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News