Started By
Message
re: Mark Ingram endorses Montee Ball on twitter
Posted on 12/6/11 at 2:51 pm to Funky Tide 8
Posted on 12/6/11 at 2:51 pm to Funky Tide 8
GERHART DESERVED TO WIN DUMB DUMB
Posted on 12/6/11 at 2:55 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
You may be correct, but we can't play the "what-if" game here...
You seriously made that statement in the SECr?
Posted on 12/6/11 at 2:58 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
doesn't matter....RG3 has the Heisman wrapped up IMO. Won't even be close.
Seems like you swore up and down there'd never be a rematch too.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:00 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
Seems like you swore up and down there'd never be a rematch too.
He surely did.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:03 pm to bmy
quote:
Ingram was statistically the worst heisman winner ever.
worse than Troy Smith?
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:04 pm to Bryant91092
quote:
GERHART DESERVED TO WIN DUMB DUMB
Well he did have over 200 more yards in one less total gamea played, 10 more td's than ingram, only 2 games sub 100(82,96) vs 5 for ingram(56,91,50,99, &
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:07 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Monte Ball doesn't even endorse Monte Ball. Monte Ball endorses RG3. TIFWIW.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:08 pm to NYCAuburn
Ingram doesn't need stats, he played for Bama 
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:08 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Well he did have over 200 more yards in one less total gamea played, 10 more td's than ingram, only 2 games sub 100(82,96) vs 5 for ingram(56,91,50,99, & 30) :just saying:
Not to mention 70 more carries than Ingram...not to mention 21 less receptions, and almost 200 less receiving yards than Ingram.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:11 pm to Funky Tide 8
RGIII is winning in a landslide
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:30 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
Monte Ball's resume is much better than Trent's...
Not even close.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:34 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
Ball wouldn't have half those TD's in the SEC
Even if he played...
Rush D rank:
# 45 USoCar
#111 Ole Miss
# 65 Miss State
# 69 Tenn
# 27 Vandy
# 40 Florida
# 99 Auburn
# 87 Kentucky
An average ranking of 68th rush defense.
Vandy being the only one in the top 30 he would've gone up against.
I think he might have gotten just as many TDs.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:36 pm to Schwaaz
quote:
Not even close.
Less carries, more yards, nearly 15 more TDs... Yea, okay. Did I mention the dude has 38 TDs? He's a running back. I know TR is damn good, but just look at those STATS STATS STATS.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:38 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Ingram was statistically the worst heisman winner ever
Next you are going to tell us that Mark is the poorest millionaire ever?
Who gives a frick - the key word there is "WINNER"
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:39 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Well he did have over 200 more yards in one less total gamea played, 10 more td's than ingram, only 2 games sub 100(82,96) vs 5 for ingram(56,91,50,99, & 30) :just saying:
I wonder how many yards I could have running against a 90lb metro league team?
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:41 pm to JPLSU1981
The one thing about Ball, is, 15 of his 32 Rushing Touchdowns, came when Wisconsin was up by 15 points or more.
Wisconsin's Red Zone Offense was insane. 61 TD's out of 70 Attempts.
Wisconsin's Red Zone Offense was insane. 61 TD's out of 70 Attempts.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:42 pm to Alahunter
quote:
You must not have seen Bo Jackson's stats the year he won the Heisman.
Maybe you are confusing Bo Jackson with Tim Brown?
Posted on 12/6/11 at 3:45 pm to LoneMDG
quote:
The one thing about Ball, is, 15 of his 32 Rushing Touchdowns, came when Wisconsin was up by 15 points or more.
And most of TR's td's came when Bama was up by alot as well. 10 td's in 3 games were against teams that scored a combined 14 points
Popular
Back to top



2









