Started By
Message
re: Kiffin has quickly made LSU
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:02 am to Boom33
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:02 am to Boom33
quote:
And I think you should be kicked out of the conference. Only school in the 93-year history of the conference to pull this shite.
literally happened last year with another school in conference
Yall are blinded with indignant rage
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 1:03 am
1
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:04 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Only because a judge shut him down.
It wasn't because of anything noble that Alabama or the conference did.
It was a single exception.
LSU/Kiffin launched a campaign to change the entire rules of the conference against the conference and its members wishes.
I guess you'll find out soon enough.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:05 am to Big EZ Tiger
There is the kind of hate where the team is always good and tough to beat. And there is the kind of hate for the team that is led by an a-hole.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:06 am to Boom33
quote:
It was a single exception.
LSU/Kiffin launched a campaign to change the entire rules of the conference against the conference and its members wishes.
I guess you'll find out soon enough.
He did the exact same thing Alabama did. The difference was the conference randomly created a rule against LSU, and didn't against Alabama.
Actually, he didn't do the exact same thing because he hasn't played anyone yet. Alabama played Bediako in 5 games.
Rules for thee, not for me.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:13 am to ThePoo
quote:
literally happened last year with another school in conference
Yall are blinded with indignant rage
No, it did not.
The Alabama case did not change the rules for the entire conference, it was a single and specific excepton.
Same thing with Chamberless.
The federal case is a 1st amendment of the constitution case, not an eligibility case.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:14 am to Boom33
quote:
No, it did not.
The Alabama case did not change the rules for the entire conference, it was a single and specific excepton.
Same thing with Chamberless.
The federal case is a 1st amendment of the constitution case, not an eligibility case.
Yoiu keep saying that as if you can't understand the actions by the schools in question were the same. It's the conference who reacted differently.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:19 am to SidewalkTiger
But y’all are forcing the nuclear option no?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:20 am to BurnsideStyle
Look, it would hurt my heart if LSU was not part of the SEC.
Are y’all willing to risk that???
Are y’all willing to risk that???
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:21 am to Boom33
quote:
The Alabama case did not change the rules for the entire conference
Why not?
quote:The federal case is not LSU “pulling this shite” it is the SECs response to LSU “pulling this shite”. The shite being, players suing for eligibility after being considered pros. Suits brought before any specific rule was in place
The federal case is a 1st amendment of the constitution case, not an eligibility case.
Aka the shite Alabama pulled
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 1:22 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:21 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
He did the exact same thing Alabama did. The difference was the conference randomly created a rule against LSU, and didn't against Alabama.
Actually, he didn't do the exact same thing because he hasn't played anyone yet. Alabama played Bediako in 5 games.
Rules for thee, not for me.
No, the difference was the Alabama case allowed 1 specific player on 1 specific claim.
Chamberless same thing - 1 specific player on 1 specific claim.
LSU/Kiffin launched a coordinated campaign to bypass and change the rule completely on who is eligible.
That's why it's a 1st amendment case.
Go over to google and ask it why if you don't believe me. Then maybe you can start to understand why the vote was 15-0 and why the conference is united against LSU and why the SEC filed a lawsuit in federal court.
But I guess you'll all keep pretending it's the same as other cases as long as you can. Some of you may take it to your graves.
If the SEC wins that case, they will be ineligible. If the SEC loses the case(and loses the appeal), they will likely start looking at removing LSU from the conference - if the conference and conferences in college football are even able to continue. It will be the destruction of conference autonomy.
You have no idea what you've done.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:22 am to BurnsideStyle
quote:
Are y’all willing to risk that???
Yes, do it!
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:24 am to ThePoo
Damn. Brutus.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:24 am to Boom33
quote:
LSU/Kiffin launched a coordinated campaign to bypass and change the rule completely on who is eligible.
According to "unnamed sources", who are notoriously reliable.
quote:
If the SEC wins that case, they will be ineligible. If the SEC loses the case(and loses the appeal), they will likely start looking at removing LSU from the conference - if the conference and conferences in college football are even able to continue. It will be the destruction of conference autonomy.
You have no idea what you've done.
Jesus, stop crying about it and do something. I literally don't care if a conference full of hypocrites and Karens kicks LSU out because they're terrified.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:26 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Jesus, stop crying about it and do something. I literally don't care if a conference full of hypocrites and Karens kicks LSU out because they're terrified.
Brutus
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:26 am to Boom33
quote:
No, the difference was the Alabama case allowed 1 specific player on 1 specific claim.
Oh well as long as it’s one player at a time doing it it’s fine then, certainly couldn’t lead to more players doing it. It’s all fine then
quote:proof outside of “sources say”?
LSU/Kiffin launched a coordinated campaign
quote:are we talking about the rule that was made like a week ago against pros? That didn’t exist when the suits were filed. LSU tried to change a rule that didn’t exist at the time players sued?
change the rule completely on who is eligible.
Or the rule that totally didn’t exist when Alabama did it?
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 1:28 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:27 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Yoiu keep saying that as if you can't understand the actions by the schools in question were the same. It's the conference who reacted differently.
How many people were made eligible with the Alabama case? 1
How many people were made eligible with the Ole Miss case? 1
How many people were made eligible with this case? Hundreds.
1 of them forced the entire conference to change it's rules.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:28 am to Boom33
quote:
How many people were made eligible with the Alabama case? 1
How many people were made eligible with the Ole Miss case? 1
How many people were made eligible with this case? Hundreds.
1 of them forced the entire conference to change it's rules.
It's wild that people like you believe that LSU and Lane Kiffin coordinated a lawsuit with hundreds of athletes across multiple states.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:29 am to Boom33
quote:no
How many people were made eligible with this case? Hundreds
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:30 am to ThePoo
quote:
Oh well as long as it’s one player at a time doing it it’s fine then, certainly couldn’t lead to more players doing it. It’s all fine then
They have to get specific exceptions. That's why the ruling made 1 player eligible, not hundreds.
quote:
proof outside of “sources say”?
That is what the lawsuit directly accuses LSU of.
quote:
are we talking about the rule that was made like a week ago against pros? That didn’t exist when the suits were filed
Or the rule that totally didn’t exist when Alabama did it?
The rule always existed. The SEC tried to clarify the rule and show LSU the entire conference was united about it even with the recent changes.
LSU ignored that clarification.
Now you are being sued in federal court for 1st amendment violations.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:31 am to ThePoo
quote:
Yes, do it!
LSU fans are willing to give up on all of their storied history and respect for this prick???
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News