Started By
Message
re: Karma for the dog shite no targeting call
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:03 pm to BoominSchous
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:03 pm to BoominSchous
I shared it with a friend before I shared it here after snipping it which only took me seconds to find the rulebook, find the rule, and snip it with a Windows tool called "Snipping Tool". Using a computer isn't that hard.
0
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:04 pm to LSUTigresFan
You are the one claiming not targeting
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:07 pm to Dawg4Life47
because it wasn't
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:12 pm to LSUTigresFan
Show the image where it isn’t
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:14 pm to Dawg4Life47
you watched the play and read the rules I shared. show me how it was?
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:17 pm to LSUTigresFan
Are you suggesting what. No launch or crown is needed w a defenseless player
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:17 pm to tigerfoot
Huh?
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:17 pm to Jenar Boy
Textbook Targeting
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:19 pm to LSUTigresFan
quote:
It wasn't targeting you dumb count. Use your little computer and look up the rulebook to help you not sound stupid.
Targeting is stupid, and I hate the rule, but that was targeting. I can bet your arse if the roles were reversed Arizona St would be called for targeting.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:19 pm to msudawg1200
quote:
Targeting is stupid, and I hate the rule, but that was targeting. I can bet your arse if the roles were reversed Arizona St would be called for targeting.
Then the hit on Bond would've literally been targeting...
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:22 pm to LSUTigresFan
Lets see what rule book says. Defenseless player, helmet to helmet. So fk you it was targeting
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:22 pm to LSUTigresFan
quote:
It wasn't targeting you dumb count. Use your little computer and look up the rulebook to help you not sound stupid.
A defenseless receiver is hit directly in the helmet by the tacklers helmet. How in the world is that not targeting? Because it was Texas? You dipshit.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:25 pm to SofaKingTrill
I was surprised it wasn't called targeting and we were very lucky that it wasn't. I don't know if it truly is or not by the letter of the law but I've seen that get called targeting many times.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:27 pm to tBrand
I thought it was, especially with the replay.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:28 pm to LSUTigresFan
Lets see what rule book says. Defenseless player, helmet to helmet. So fk you it was targeting
This post was edited on 1/1/25 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:33 pm to Tiger on the Rag
It was targeting as most officiating crews call it, I can agree with that.
Now can the rest of you agree that picking up the ball carrier and tossing them into the endzone is also a penalty? 5 yarder, but still a penalty.
Now can the rest of you agree that picking up the ball carrier and tossing them into the endzone is also a penalty? 5 yarder, but still a penalty.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:34 pm to LSU1860
No doubt
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:35 pm to LSUTigresFan
The Fock it wasn’t wasn’t you pathetic schmuck
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:35 pm to Jenar Boy
quote:
Karma for the dog shite no targeting call
Ball don't lie you soft arse pussies
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:36 pm to LSUTigresFan
quote:
It wasn't targeting you dumb count. Use your little computer and look up the rulebook to help you not sound stupid.
"However, if a player is defenseless, you can’t initiate contact above the shoulders, even if you don’t lead with the crown.
Players are also prohibited from targeting and making forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless player with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder."
LINK
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News