Started By
Message
re: It's going to completely frikkin SUCK if Auburn moves to the east
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:48 am to LovetheLord
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:48 am to LovetheLord
Definitely where I parked my car...
1
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:50 am to Stonehog
that would be horrible you wouldn't see the other teams for 10 years.
bye bye permanent cross division games. hsv will have to suck extra dick for tickets to the once every 4 years iron bowl.
bye bye permanent cross division games. hsv will have to suck extra dick for tickets to the once every 4 years iron bowl.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:52 am to heartbreakTiger
By my count you would play the other teams every 5 years, but I'm not good at rithmetic.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:53 am to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
Definitely where I parked my travel trailer full of popcorn...
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:55 am to Stonehog
quote:
Move Vandy and Tennessee to the West and move Bama and Auburn to the East. Bama could still have Tennessee as their permanent West opponnent and still play AU every year.
I like this, but Bama would lose their game with LSU..
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:56 am to Luke
quote:
And you'll never understand the Iron Bowl and what it means to the people of this state..
________
quote:
Must mean a whole lot more to the sidewalk bammers... AU Alumni could care less and would enjoy watching bama lose one of its so called great traditions due to our realignment
You are insinuating au alumni could care less about continuing to play the Iron Bowl?
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:58 am to Stonehog
2 perm teams and then the other 5 one by one it would take 10 years finish it off, you would be going home and home so each team takes 2 years to rotate off the schedule.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:59 am to bona fide
quote:
quote:
Must mean a whole lot more to the sidewalk bammers... AU Alumni could care less and would enjoy watching bama lose one of its so called great traditions due to our realignment
You are insinuating au alumni could care less about continuing to play the Iron Bowl?
No, he is insinuating that the AU alumni hate Alabama for ritualistically beating their asses into the ground for 50 years so much that they would resort to petty tactics, like moving divisions just to take away our rivalry game with Tenn, than keep the Iron Bowl intact the way it has been since before the turn of the LAST century.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:59 am to allin2010
the easiest way to do this is add a east team or throw someone new like mizzou into the east even though it makes no sense.
or we could move both auburn and bama and then just move vandy
or we could move both auburn and bama and then just move vandy
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:00 am to ThaKaptin
quote:
they would resort to petty tactics, like moving divisions just to take away our rivalry game with Tenn, than keep the Iron Bowl intact the way it has been since before the turn of the LAST century.
It's just a game, kind of like it was just two trees.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:00 am to LovetheLord
quote:Remember Glass houses, since your fans are now best known for killing trees jackass.
How about this, you're program is known more for its jackass fans than for championships
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:00 am to heartbreakTiger
I meant just rotate the other five teams once a year. So LSU could play Bama and Florida from the East every year, then the third game might be Georgia. The next year the third game could be Kentucky and so on.
But it would take 10 years between road trips to the rotating schools, which does suck.
But it would take 10 years between road trips to the rotating schools, which does suck.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:01 am to allin2010
I think the iron bowl needs another break but am obviously in the minority. Nama fans would rather keep the iron bowl and third sat in oct than the LSU game. I am not so sure alSU fans would mnd so much either to be honest.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:03 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
In that scenario you lose the ut uf game. there really is no good way to go about this.
There is if people were capable of thinking outside the box. The solution is incredibly simple. Missouri simply joins as an SEC East team and nothing really changes. Apparently it's more important to accomodate a brand new conference member than preserving 90+ of conference tradition.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:08 am to NorthGwinnettTiger
It was only two trees? I seriously thought it was four, what the hell is all the fuss about.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:09 am to bona fide
quote:
It was only two trees? I seriously thought it was four, what the hell is all the fuss about.
Ahh hell, you know how whiny those sandy-vages on the plains get. Always crying about something.
This post was edited on 9/27/11 at 10:14 am
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:10 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
In that scenario you lose the ut uf game. there really is no good way to go about this.
That game doesn't have anything on the UT/Bama game. One rivarly has been played over 90 times and the other started in the 90's.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:10 am to LovetheLord
quote:
How about this, you're program is known more for its jackass fans than for championships.
Sounds like the Alabama Crimson Tide.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:16 am to heartbreakTiger
Add atm to the west and keep everything else the same.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:25 am to I-59 Tiger
quote:
quote:
How about this, you're program is known more for its jackass fans than for championships.
Sounds like the Alabama Crimson Tide.
Did you consult a 7th grader for that come back?
Page 5 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News