Started By
Message
re: Is it possible that OU and Missouri leave the conference?
Posted on 6/30/25 at 10:47 am to CharlotteSooner
Posted on 6/30/25 at 10:47 am to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Would anyone notice if you stopped talking?
C'mon now that's silly. Of course we would. There would be fewer moronic threads started. Still a bunch but fewer. ..
0
Posted on 6/30/25 at 10:54 am to TN Tygah
quote:
Missouri is a lost cause. They will never belong.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 10:59 am to MtVernon
quote:
A&M left the Big 12 over a TV channel
and so did Mizzou, Nebraska, and Colorado. Texas caused that and the Big12 is now nothing of its formal self. The SEC will not stand for the same shite you pulled in the SWC and Big12. The Longhorn network is now just a school streaming package now the likes of which most every other SEC team has.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 11:05 am to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Your program is drenched in jealousy over your big bro.
Much that got erased when "big bro" had to follow us to our conference to stay relevant.
After years of shite talking that conference....
Posted on 6/30/25 at 11:07 am to Landmass
quote:
The SEC will not stand for the same shite you pulled in the SWC and Big12.
Meaning what? What kind of shite would that be? Name the "shite" that you speak of, and feel free to skip ESPN offering a network to Texas. Because any of you would have taken it.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 11:12 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
Much that got erased when "big bro" had to follow us to our conference to stay relevant.
Trial experimentation is never applied to the main subject.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 11:15 am to TN Tygah
Missouri isn't in the SEC.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 11:18 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
Much that got erased when "big bro" had to follow us to our conference to stay relevant.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 11:23 am to TN Tygah
According to ChatGPT, Mizzou would be a better fit in B1G.
Why Missouri Fits Better in the Big Ten:
1. Geographic Fit
• Missouri is a Midwestern state, and its flagship university (Mizzou, in Columbia) is squarely located in a Big Ten-style geographic zone.
• It borders Iowa, Nebraska, and Illinois — all current Big Ten states.
• The cultural and regional footprint of Missouri aligns more with states in the Big Ten than the Deep South.
Why Missouri Fits Better in the Big Ten:
1. Geographic Fit
• Missouri is a Midwestern state, and its flagship university (Mizzou, in Columbia) is squarely located in a Big Ten-style geographic zone.
• It borders Iowa, Nebraska, and Illinois — all current Big Ten states.
• The cultural and regional footprint of Missouri aligns more with states in the Big Ten than the Deep South.
This post was edited on 6/30/25 at 11:24 am
Posted on 6/30/25 at 11:23 am to Landmass
quote:
and so did Mizzou, Nebraska, and Colorado. Texas caused that and the Big12 is now nothing of its formal self. The SEC will not stand for the same shite you pulled in the SWC and Big12. The Longhorn network is now just a school streaming package now the likes of which most every other SEC team has.
Just so everyone is educated on this, Missouri is the only one who left who voted for a conference network and equal revenue sharing. Everyone else that left, voted for the mess they created and then bailed when their votes turned into sucking balls.
Missouri is the only one who left for the conference not giving them what they wanted. Everyone else were just bitches.
This post was edited on 6/30/25 at 11:28 am
Posted on 6/30/25 at 11:25 am to Boomer65
Missouri also borders oklahoma, arkansas, tennessee, kentucky. that is 4 compared to 3.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 11:43 am to Boomer65
quote:
The cultural and regional footprint of Missouri aligns more with states in the Big Ten than the Deep South.
Does it really though?
Posted on 6/30/25 at 11:54 am to CharlotteSooner
Laugh all you want, yall were the Mizzou of that deal.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 12:01 pm to MtVernon
quote:
Meaning what? What kind of shite would that be? Name the "shite" that you speak of, and feel free to skip ESPN offering a network to Texas. Because any of you would have taken it.
Not even Bama would have negotiated the contract with ESPN in the dark without the SEC knowing what was in it. Here is some shite yall agreed to in that contract that the Big 12 had no clue about until an Aggie did a Freedom of Information request:
-As part of it yall sold the championship game to Texas high school football. The Big 12 would have vetoed that.
-Yall arranged a situation where a conference game would be on the network. The Big 12 outright said no to that and your AD was like "its happening fricking deal with it."
-Yall were going to highlight high school recruits on the network to benefit Texas recruiting, luckily the NCAA said frick that.
But yeah, great partners and all.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 12:05 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
Laugh all you want, yall were the Mizzou of that deal.
I don't think so. At first, OU was stronger in favor than Texas. This was definitely two schools working together - no tag-alongs.
OU could have joined SEC without Texas, for that matter.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 12:12 pm to cardboardboxer
You need to understand that "yall" = ESPN, in your above ramblings.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 12:31 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
Laugh all you want, yall were the Mizzou of that deal.
That's just self-delusion f*ckin with ya.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 12:32 pm to Landmass
quote:
The only way they don't fit is in your head.
Most people didn’t even know Missouri had a football team until a few years ago. They don’t fit in any way, shape or form.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 12:37 pm to MtVernon
quote:
I don't think so. At first, OU was stronger in favor than Texas. This was definitely two schools working together - no tag-alongs. OU could have joined SEC without Texas, for that matter.
Yeah, it was no secret Joe C and Chris DC were working together to gtfo of Big 12.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 12:51 pm to Boomer65
OU and Texas are a great example of keeping the rivalry on the field. Both schools know the value of the pair.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News