Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:24 pm to Masterag
Dude they don’t have the schedule to deserve to be called that and at this point they have played no one. Lets see how the season plays out first before all this greatest of all time talk. They have had some very good squads.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:26 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
Best Ever: 1945 Army
quote:
Ok, do you think '16 LSU could beat 1945 ARMY?
Honest answer?
The worst SEC team this season Arkansas, would beat the 1945 Army team by 100 points.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:26 pm to Woodreaux
quote:
Best Ever: 1945 Army
You’re kidding right?
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:28 pm to Loserman
If they pull Dick Winters and Ronald Speirs out of France nobody beats 45 Army
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:30 pm to Loserman
quote:
The worst SEC team this season Arkansas, would beat the 1945 Army team by 100 points
fricking exactly. I'd love to have a time machine and see just exactly how much more dominant today's guys over the dudes who were 5'9" 180. Right? Holy shite, it wouldn't even be close.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:30 pm to Loserman
quote:
The worst SEC team this season Arkansas, would beat the 1945 Army team by 100 points.
They could literally run the ball every down for the entire game and score at will. This is a joke. 300 lb lineman weren’t even the norm until the 80’s. It would be an absolute bloodbath.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:32 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
Anyone before 1985 deserves no recognition as the best ever.
That criteria is called "Best college football team since 1985". That's in a different thread, not this one.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:34 pm to Loserman
quote:
The same 2007 team that lost 2 games?
The GOAT two-loss team.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:38 pm to Woodreaux
quote:
That criteria is called "Best college football team since 1985". That's in a different thread, not this one.
Not if they can't beat anyone post 1985. I'm sorry, 1945 Army is not beating 2012 Auburn. Or any of the worst teams you can name since 1985. So therefore, that would disqualify them as the best team ever. It's just not the same game with the same athletes.
I mean if the team you named can't beat anyone 40 years later, idk wtf the 1985 delineation has you so upset about, but that would be "best ever, no? So, what. The hell. Are. You. Talking. About?
This post was edited on 10/4/18 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:42 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
1945 Army is not beating 2012 Auburn
I don't know if I would go that far....
That 2012 Auburn team was really awful
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:48 pm to Loserman
quote:
I don't know if I would go that far....
That 2012 Auburn team was really awful
I know. That is the point. The average athlete in 2012 is absolutely light years ahead of the average athlete in 1945. It isn even close. Plus, they did not even allow the best athletes to play back then. Name anyone from 1945 ARMY that is running AT LEAST A 4.75 40....I'll hang up and wait, because it's not happening.
Google the avg weight of the 1945 ARMY o-line and d-line.
You can't compare them and anyone trying to is just delusional to their time to feel better about themselves
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:49 pm to IAmNERD
Why are we trying to compare teams from different eras again?
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:52 pm to Sun God
quote:
Why are we trying to compare teams from different eras again?
Am I taking crazy pills?Because user Woodreaux said 1945 ARMY was the best team EVAR...
And this is literally from my last post
quote:
You can't compare them
But Woodreaux knows 1945 ARMY is the absolute best.
This post was edited on 10/4/18 at 11:02 pm
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:57 pm to MykTide
Probably
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:58 pm to elposter
quote:
OP you can take your rat poison and shove it up your arse.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 11:02 pm to Masterag
IF Bama goes 15-0 and IF they win every game by double digits.
THEN you have a legit argument.
THEN you have a legit argument.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 11:04 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
IAmNERD
His point is probably, "the best team relative to their peers" rather than, "the best team ever assembled". I probably wouldn't agree with that assessment, but I think everyone understands the intent.
This post was edited on 10/4/18 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 10/4/18 at 11:10 pm to Woodreaux
Most high school teams would stomp that 45 Army team.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 11:14 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
The average athlete in 2012 is absolutely light years ahead of the average athlete in 1945. It isn even close.
No shite. The average athlete in 2012 was light years ahead of players in the 70s and 80s. It's like when people try to convince me Wilt Chamberlain was the GOAT NBA player when he was competing against a bunch of 5'10" white guys with crewcuts that all smoked two packs of unfiltered Camels a day and worked as Teamsters in the offseason.
It's silly to compare athletes across generations like that.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News