Started By
Message
re: i'm surprised SC doesn't think the penalty on the nussmeier hit wasn't a penalty
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:12 am to Top of the Rock
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:12 am to Top of the Rock
quote:
It was an Oscar worthy flop
haha
yep
and it worked…
0
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:13 am to Ponchy Tiger
I always thought people from Louisiana were relatively tough. They’ve gotten very soft…I guess all the poors and years of living on govt. subsistence?
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:14 am to UltimaParadox
quote:
Nuss throws interception and is running towards the play. Gets shoved and sells the hit like he was blindsided. Since he is a QB it gets the call.
STFU.... had missileToe and bama been in that situation, you and your Gump brothers would be screaming PERSONAL FOUL!
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:25 am to U_south_cack
U_south_cack
i would put a size 14 so far up your arse you would have shoe polish on your kidneys
fuggin punk…
i would put a size 14 so far up your arse you would have shoe polish on your kidneys
fuggin punk…
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:30 am to General RL Bullard
That was a trash arse cheap shot all day long. The penalty was well deserved.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:30 am to Top of the Rock
If blindside block wasn’t called against LSU earlier they would have let this slide. But the SC hit was twice as blatant as LSU’s shoulder block the previous quarter.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:31 am to stephendomalley
Lead with hands, by rule, no penalty
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:42 am to stephendomalley
Is Nussmeier an avid soccer fan?
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:43 am to U_south_cack
quote:
They know they lost this game and had an ungodly amount of health to squeak by. It’s sad.
Oh you’re so mad lol. Guess you won’t talk about the blocked punt that was a penalty as well that the refs blew.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:44 am to General RL Bullard
We might’ve lost this game but thank the Almighty Lord I didn’t grow up in or have to go back to Louisiana after.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:51 am to lewis and herschel
quote:
Lead with hands, by rule, no penalty
Cite that rule.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:51 am to Flavius C Julianus
Posted on 9/15/24 at 12:02 pm to stephendomalley
Three flags were thrown immediately after the hit on the LSU quarterback during the interception. Three refs were watching the quarterback.
I know it sucks for South Carolina fans but the days of getting a free hit on the quarterback during an interception appear to be over.
I know it sucks for South Carolina fans but the days of getting a free hit on the quarterback during an interception appear to be over.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 12:11 pm to IlliniBuck
If someone in the NFL made that exact same play they get fined the next day.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 12:14 pm to SouthernInsanity
quote:
STFU.... had missileToe and bama been in that situation, you and your Gump brothers would be screaming PERSONAL FOUL!
LSU is flop U.
Bama players don't flop to beg for penalties
Posted on 9/15/24 at 12:15 pm to CarolinaGamecock99
Based on that, it should have been targeting.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 12:17 pm to U_south_cack
quote:
Also the horse collar wasn’t horse collar. No pad was grabbed.
The rule says pads or jersey so that one was correct.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 12:19 pm to dstone12
quote:
I thought it didn’t need to be called because the defender/blocker actually led with his hands.
It wasn’t a launch.
Launching is related to targeting. The penalty was a blindside hit, which it was.
Posted on 9/15/24 at 12:19 pm to stephendomalley
quote:
i see this called all the time.
I'm still unclear what the penalty was.
It wasn't a block in the back... as he wasn't blocked in the back.
It wasn't/shouldn't have been a blind side hit... because a blind side hit by rule requires "forcible contact" and by definition any contact initiated with the hands is NOT forcible contact. Nuss was shoved with the hands by the blocker.
I realize it was ruled an unsportsmanlike conduct foul of some kind, but UC is a category, not an infraction. For example, you can have UC - roughing the passer... the actual infraction is roughing the passer. It's just classified as unsportsmanlike conduct.
So what exactly did the blocker do that was wrong if it wasn't a blindside hit or a block in the back?
Posted on 9/15/24 at 12:20 pm to Quicksilver
quote:
The penalty was a blindside hit, which it was.
Then why wasn't it called that? He was flagged for a personal foul.
Here's the signal for illegal blindside block. That is not what was called.
Please tell me how THAT CONTACT, if not a blindside was "unnecessary roughness"?
The most telling part is Pussmier stands their for a few seconds and then takes off for the ball carrier. IMHO, this makes him fair game to block by SC.
This post was edited on 9/15/24 at 12:22 pm
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News