Started By
Message
re: If you could kick 2 schools out of the conference, who would they be and why?
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:58 am to GainesvilleDawg
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:58 am to GainesvilleDawg
LSU and Ole Miss. Mostly because the states of Mississippi and Louisiana suck so badly.
0
Posted on 3/31/22 at 9:58 am to GainesvilleDawg
Vandy and Missoula. Both bring nothing to the table in form of competition and revenue .
Posted on 3/31/22 at 10:13 am to GainesvilleDawg
It must suck to be a Missouri fan. Missouri is in over 95% of the answers here. I need a Missouri fan to chime an and tell me why they think that is.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 10:26 am to CelticTiger
I am a top 5 poster on this website.
It’s biased and slander that keep my reputation low.
It’s biased and slander that keep my reputation low.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 10:32 am to GainesvilleDawg
Tejas and Oklahoma. Woulda been better to add FSU and NC State, then move Misery west.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 10:47 am to GBJs
In the absence of tejas and Oklahoma, there is no reason for orange and add any team that forfeits a bowl game.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 12:43 pm to GainesvilleDawg
A&M and Mizzou
They're just not needed. They were only taken in because the SEC couldn't get Texas/Oklahoma a decade ago.
I also think it would be good for A&M if they got out of our shadow and went and propped a conference up. The Big 12 would be right up their alley. I don't care enough about Mizzou to write an explanation.
They're just not needed. They were only taken in because the SEC couldn't get Texas/Oklahoma a decade ago.
I also think it would be good for A&M if they got out of our shadow and went and propped a conference up. The Big 12 would be right up their alley. I don't care enough about Mizzou to write an explanation.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 1:46 pm to GainesvilleDawg
LSU and LSU
Posted on 3/31/22 at 3:07 pm to Wildcat1996
Missouri & A&M Gaggies! 
Posted on 3/31/22 at 3:54 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
Fixed it for you.
Ok, fan of the school I consider to be a filter of players for Alabama because they only choose Auburn for the wrong reasons.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 3:58 pm to TouchdownTony
quote:
Lets get back to the real SEC.
I don't think you know what you are asking for. In the 29 years since Arkansas and South Carolina were added, the SEC has won 16 national championships.
In the 29 years prior to Arkansas and South Carolina being added, the SEC won 6 national championships. The "real" SEC wasn't that hot, baw.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 4:08 pm to GainesvilleDawg
Auburn and Tennessee
Because frick those guys.
Because frick those guys.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 4:16 pm to GainesvilleDawg
Bama and Auburn.
It would be nice to see a game called by non-Alabama alum and fans for once. We might see some consistency. Plus, neither team can figure out their mascot situation.
It would be nice to see a game called by non-Alabama alum and fans for once. We might see some consistency. Plus, neither team can figure out their mascot situation.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:03 pm to GainesvilleDawg
quote:I get really tired of these types of discussions, Kentucky is an original member and Missouri has brought lots of viewers to the SEC. We should be supporting our conference members instead of sowing divisive polls that really serve no positive point.
My 2 are Mizzou and Kentucky.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:04 pm to schmoo
So who would you kick out instead? Since that's the premise of this thread and all.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 7:53 pm to GainesvilleDawg
If you could post one topic for the 10,000th time, which one would it be and why is it this one?
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News