re: If Oklahoma joined SEC every team/school would literally lose money.

quote:

---

Born, raised, and still live in KCMO. You sir, are full of shite, and you know it.

---

To be fair, the past couple of years people in CoMo didn't even watch Mizzou

quote:

---

Born, raised, and still live in KCMO.

---

What do you think of Jefferson City?

It has that vibe of being the city in between like Frankfort, KY was between Louisville and Lexington.

quote:

---

2003 - Oklahoma, who didn't win their conference got shut down by LSU, who DID win their conference.

---

This didn't happen....

quote:

---

2008 - Florida dominated Oklahoma

---

Neither did this...

quote:

---

Mizzou would be in the Big 10 if the Big 10 wanted them. This is undeniable.

The B1G didn't want Missouri though, so SEC it was.

---

WRONG. The Big 10 wanted Missouri, but on their terms making significantly less $$$ to start.

Mizzou told them F-U and Nebraska swooped in and accepted the slight to shed themselves of the XII.

WRONG. The Big 10 wanted Missouri, but on their terms making significantly less $$$ to start.

Mizzou told them F-U and Nebraska swooped in and accepted the slight to shed themselves of the XII.

aka the BIG wasn't that interested.

Missouri is a much better fit in the BIG & would've jumped at a real offer.. arguenent that they should have taken any deal offered to secure the oppty.

OU vs an SEC Big 6 team each weekend would be must see TV for college football.

The ESPN money will dry up over the next decade. A quality, traditional power house college football team will out perform in ratings your preferred, large TV market team any day.

Most of the country would rather watch OU vs LSU on prime time instead of UNC/UVA/VA Tech vs LSU.

The Sooners have been winning championships since the 1950s, only one SEC team has more and I'm not tracking any SEC team with more Heisman trophy winners.

I think Mizzou knows that if the SEC were to trim fat, Mizzou would be the first logical choice.

Throw that TV market data out the window, Mizzou brings absolutely zero prestige, and zero championships in any collegiate sport.

I would trade OU for Mizzou in a heartbeat. Tradition rich OU vs (well, I can't think what Mizzou brings to the table other than a few TV sets in STL.

quote:

---

Prior to the BCS title game, the 2003 Sooners averaged over 45 points per game. LSU held them to 14. That's called BEING SHUT DOWN.

---

This game was a tail of two halves. They shoved us around the first half, we shoved them around the second, and came up short on a goal line stand as time expired. It's a national title game. I wouldn't expect you to understand the dynamics of such a game, and/or the irrelevance of "season totals" in such a game.

quote:

---

Prior to playing Florida, the 2008 Sooners averaged 54 points per game. Their lowest point output in any game prior to that was 35. The Gators held them to 14. That's called "being dominated"

---

This game was a defensive battle throughout and tied at 14 midway through the 4th quarter. The game turned midway through the 4th quarter when Florida made the plays they had to make to pull ahead. We failed to convert two scoring opportunities from their 10 yard line earlier in the game which is what did us in. We didn't have DeMarco Murray for that game either, which was a huge part of that offense that averaged "54 points per game". That's not "being dominated" That's called a "National Title Game".

Again, it was a national title game, and I don't expect you, an Aggot, to understand the difference between a regular season game and a national title game. But I DO expect you, of all fanbases, to know what "being dominated" really is. Look no further than what Bama does to you every season. THAT.....is "being dominated"