Started By
Message
re: I thought the SECCG was a meaningless game
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:11 am to Violent Hip Swivel
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:11 am to Violent Hip Swivel
The SEC championship is a huge deal to old school SEC fans. Maybe for the newer, younger fans it doesn't mean anything. But for us old codgers it still means A LOT.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:13 am to Opry
quote:
A first round draft pick got injured in a meaningless game and robbed him of the ability to play in the playoffs. There is no changing that but you can try to color it any way you want.
Winning the championship of the best conference in the country is meaningless?
Perhaps teams with several mercenaries might feel that way, but this Georgia team apparently doesn't.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:14 am to Opry
quote:
A first round draft pick got injured in a meaningless game and robbed him of the ability to play in the playoffs. There is no changing that but you can try to color it any way you want.
In theory a player is just as likely to be injured in a first round playoff game as he is in a conference championship game, except with less time to heal up.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:15 am to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
I thought the SECCG was a meaningless game
Newsflash: narratives have been changing, whimsically forming and evaporating to no end since the BCS ended. Buckle up
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:17 am to Violent Hip Swivel
They were playing for a first round bye which is yuge. But meaningless from the standpoint that both teams were in the CFP
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:20 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
You can certainly argue it was "meaningless" for texas who was 1000% in the playoffs regardless of what happened.
I definitely was not meaningless to our players, coaches and fans. People talking about how Texas fans didn't travel should see that the expanded playoff changes budgets and travel plans. The SEC means a lot, but to fans of every team the upcoming road to a shot at the NC means more.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:31 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
You can certainly argue it was "meaningless" for texas who was 1000% in the playoffs regardless of what happened.
Certainly not meaningless for Texas. I would have loved to have won it our first year in. To be honest, it was awesome just getting to Atlanta in our first year despite all the talk that our hand-picked schedule was weak. Nevertheless we still had to perform and we got there.
Now on to the playoffs to have some more fun. It’s sad that all this will be over in a few short weeks.
This post was edited on 12/10/24 at 9:34 am
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:31 am to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
I thought the SECCG was a meaningless game
Sark definitely wanted to win the game.. but we shot ourselves in the foot repeatedly.. over and over.. all game long.
1st Drive - 7 plays 43 yards
Interception
2nd Drive - 9 plays 65 yards
1st and 10 at the GA 21
Pass Interferences on Bond
1st and 25 at the GA 36
Field Goal
3rd Drive - 14 plays 56 yards
1st and 10 at the GA 22
Holding on Bond
1st and 20 at the GA 32
Field Goal
4th Drive - 8 plays 51 yards
4th and 5 at GA 19 - Made FG but had False Start
4th and 10 at GA 24 - Missed FG
5th Drive - 7 plays 16 yards
Holding on Cam Williams
Punt
HALF
6th Drive - 4 plays 3 yards
Not a good start to the 2nd half. Punt
7th Drive - 5 plays 6 yards after Punt Return
Missed Field Goal
8th Drive - 5 plays 75 yards
TOUCHDOWN
9th Drive - 3 plays - 7 Yards
INTERCEPTION - Horrible decision, but we got an interception on defense.
10th Drive - 11 plays 47 yards
Stalled in Georgia territory - Field Goal
10 Drives
3 Field Goals
2 Missed Field Goals
1 Touchdown
2 Interceptions
2 Punts
We completely dominated the 1st half in everything but the score.. and somehow had more points in the 2nd half, despite less plays, less yards and less good drives.. funny how that works out..
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:32 am to Miznoz
it sucks for the loser because Texas has to play four more games while Tenn sat at home with a bye before their four games
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:34 am to Legionfield
quote:
This ND team is MUCH better than any UGA or Bama has played in the past...
To be honest, several pundits are picking Indiana to upset ND.
Indiana with Cignetti is the true sleeper.
This ND team is no better than some of the teams in the SEC that Georgia has already faced.
Georgia is 3-0 against ND all time, including a natty game match-up.
But you had better not look past IU first.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:38 am to BigTx
quote:
Certainly not meaningless for Texas.
I mean the SECCG is never "meaningless", (in my opinion) I was simply pointing out that with Texas specifically they were already assured the playoffs. The biggest thing, aside from the hardware, Texas was playing for was getting a 1st round bye vs hosting a 1st round game in Austin against one of the lowest seeds. Either one of those is a pretty sweet deal.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:43 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
The game is pretty much the same as it's always been; high risk and high rewar
There wasn't a "risk" in playing in the game this year. Everyone knew that the winner and loser were getting into the playoffs. I do think that there was much more of a risk in playing before the 12 team playoff. GA didn't get in last year because they lost the game.
Both teams playing in SECCG got in
Both teams playing in ACCCG got in
Both teams playing in the Big 10 CG got in
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:45 am to Opry
quote:H
A first round draft pick got injured
He's shown himself throughout the course of the year to no longer merit this consideration. He'll go second round, and be a career backup.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:45 am to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
It sure as frick wasn't for Georgia
Tell that to your qb and punter.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 9:49 am to Opry
quote:This will always be the risk playing a CCG while not all playoff participants (*coughDomerscough*) have to do the same, and some that do don't have the same physical pounding of two SEC teams clashing.
A first round draft pick got injured in a meaningless game and robbed him of the ability to play in the playoffs. There is no changing that but you can try to color it any way you want.
That said, the SECCG does mean something and I know our team and fans were pretty crushed when we came up short. Sure we're still in the playoffs, but it would feel much better going in an SEC champs...not to mention the first round bye to heal up further.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 10:19 am to BigBro
quote:Incorrect.
We completely dominated the 1st half
• Never made it into UGA’s red zone
• Sacked twice for -8 yards
• 4 penalties for 45 yards
• Threw an INT after recovering your own fumble on the first series
• Missed a FG
• Had 12 rushes for just 37 yards
The only thing you “dominated” was our 2nd-string CB, Daniel Harris #7, making his first start on short notice after our starter quit last week. That’s smart scheming by Sark, and accuracy by Ewers. But exploiting one match-up between the 20’s when you hold the ball for >20 mins and come away with 6 points isn’t “dominating” anything.
The story of the1H was simply 1) both Defenses winning their side of the ball, 2) both teams’ WR drops, 3a) Texas’ missed FG, and 3b) UGA forgoing a FG in place of a stupid Hail Mary call.
It was actually a pretty poor 1H from an Offensive and ST execution standpoint
quote:Incorrect. UGA outscored Texas 13-10 in 2H
and somehow had more points in the 2nd half
This post was edited on 12/10/24 at 10:30 am
Posted on 12/10/24 at 10:23 am to BigBro
quote:
We completely dominated the 1st half in everything but the score.
Total yards were something like 250-50 at some point in that firs half, but score was only 6-3. Thankful of your 5 yard PK penalty.
That was what we had to do to have a shot.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 11:16 am to Demosthenian
quote:
and somehow had more points in the 2nd half
Incorrect. UGA outscored Texas 13-10 in 2H
I was only talking about Texas.
6 points first half on 5 drives, 45 plays and 215 yards
10 points in 2nd half on 5 drives, 28 plays and 126 yards
quote:
We completely dominated the 1st half
Georgia 22 plays 90 yards 5 1st downs, 3 points
Texas 45 plays, 215 yards 10 1st downs, 6 points
That's domination. We moved the ball at ease for most of the half, but it just didn't show up on the scoreboard, mostly because we kept getting stupid penalties that could have been avoided.. our fault, not blaming the refs, and yes, Georgia played a big role in that as well. Then again, we never had red zone success, so perhaps the penalties helped because we actually were forced to kick field goals.
The play of the game was the fake punt though. Great call by Kirby.
We ran a trick play on a punt as well.. not sure technically if we should have been called for a false start or if y'all actually jumped.. I just saw 15 people move all of the sudden and was like wtf is going on? Clearly it was planned to try and get GA to jump offsides, but we either fooled the ref or didn't execute it the right way.
At the end of the day, I believe your experience paid off. I also think Ewers is a liability in games like this.. he is good enough to beat 95%+ of teams in the country.. but he shits the bed at times.. TBD if Sark will use Arch more in the playoffs.. and I'm not saying Arch is ready for that moment, but Ewers has shown that he isn't so far..
Posted on 12/10/24 at 11:48 am to Chip82
quote:
To be honest, several pundits are picking Indiana to upset ND.
Indiana with Cignetti is the true sleeper.
This ND team is no better than some of the teams in the SEC that Georgia has already faced.
Georgia is 3-0 against ND all time, including a natty game match-up.
But you had better not look past IU first.
More pundits are picking ND to make the semis which means them beating Georgia than to lose to Indiana so I wouldn't read too much into that unless you actually believe them to be accurate
Popular
Back to top

0











