Started By
Message
Posted on 1/20/14 at 4:55 pm to Rebelfan1985
quote:Dude, we get it, you think Ole Miss should be ranked above Arkansas despite all evidence to the contrary. Let it go.
I could care less about the these rankings
I replied to kilo who said
quote:
Nice thread. You should fill your nets with this. These are always good to gauge who the most insecure fan bases are around here.
This was our conversation and my observation of the fan bases.
Me continuing to post doesn't mean anything except that you are dense as frick and incapable of grasping the concept that one can have a conversation inside of a thread that has nothing to do with the title of the thread, and by continuing to comment on an off topic inside of a thread doesn't mean I'm contributing to the original topic or interested in it.
But thanks for replying to me, what i said about arky fans insecurity must be true because you of replied, and will continue to reply.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 4:59 pm to The Spleen
quote:
And 2-5 are somewhat interchangeable.
Pretty much no way Tennessee goes below Georgia or Auburn. I guess you could put them below LSU if you heavily weight the rankings towards the past decade. Only way Tennessee goes below Florida is if you're you ignore everything before the 70's.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:00 pm to Hog on the Hill
I never said where I think anyone should be
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:01 pm to ohiovol
I think most people have yall at 2 or 3 at worst
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:02 pm to Chronic
national titles (AP/Coaches) - 4 points each
SEC titles - 3 points each
bowl wins - 2 points each
division titles - 1 point each
Alabama: 40 + 69 + 68 + 9 = 186
Tennessee: 8 + 39 + 50 + 6 = 103
Georgia: 4 + 36 + 54 + 7 = 101
LSU: 12 + 33 + 46 + 8 = 99
Florida: 12 + 24 + 40 + 12 = 88
Auburn: 8 + 24 + 44 + 8 = 84
*Our vacated 84 SEC title and Alabama's vacated 05 bowl win aren't included.
SEC titles - 3 points each
bowl wins - 2 points each
division titles - 1 point each
Alabama: 40 + 69 + 68 + 9 = 186
Tennessee: 8 + 39 + 50 + 6 = 103
Georgia: 4 + 36 + 54 + 7 = 101
LSU: 12 + 33 + 46 + 8 = 99
Florida: 12 + 24 + 40 + 12 = 88
Auburn: 8 + 24 + 44 + 8 = 84
*Our vacated 84 SEC title and Alabama's vacated 05 bowl win aren't included.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:04 pm to ohiovol
quote:
Pretty much no way Tennessee goes below Georgia or Auburn. I guess you could put them below LSU if you heavily weight the rankings towards the past decade. Only way Tennessee goes below Florida is if you're you ignore everything before the 70's.
Well if it's before 90, it should be ignored.

Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:04 pm to RB10
What is considered modern college football? Before/after black people were allowed to play?
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:04 pm to Korin
quote:
LINK
There you go linking that bullshite site again, USMC Gator.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:05 pm to Chronic
1. Alabama
2. Tennessee
3. LSU
4. Georgia
5. Auburn
6. Florida
7. Arkansas
8. Texas A&M
9. Ole Miss
10. Missouri
11. South Carolina
12. Vanderbilt
13. Mississippi State
14. Kentucky
2. Tennessee
3. LSU
4. Georgia
5. Auburn
6. Florida
7. Arkansas
8. Texas A&M
9. Ole Miss
10. Missouri
11. South Carolina
12. Vanderbilt
13. Mississippi State
14. Kentucky
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:05 pm to Korin
Those have less weight and didn't make any difference in my list between two teams.
If I remember right, those two categories would've hurt UT instead of help.
If I remember right, those two categories would've hurt UT instead of help.
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:05 pm to AUCE05
Or scholarship limits beginning in 75.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:06 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
1. Alabama
2. Tennessee
3. LSU
4. Georgia
5. Auburn
6. Florida
7. Arkansas
8. Texas A&M
9. Ole Miss
10. Missouri
11. South Carolina
12. Vanderbilt
13. Mississippi State
14. Kentucky
this.

Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:07 pm to tiger perry
It's too close between Georgia and LSU, just like us and Auburn.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:10 pm to Rebelfan1985
quote:
could care less about the these rankings
I replied to kilo who said
quote:
Nice thread. You should fill your nets with this. These are always good to gauge who the most insecure fan bases are around here.
This was our conversation and my observation of the fan bases.
Me continuing to post doesn't mean anything except that you are dense as frick and incapable of grasping the concept that one can have a conversation inside of a thread that has nothing to do with the title of the thread, and by continuing to comment on an off topic inside of a thread doesn't mean I'm contributing to the original topic or interested in it.
But thanks for replying to me, what i said about arky fans insecurity must be true because you of replied, and will continue to reply.
For someone that tries to paint themselves as indifferent and possessing of some sort of emotional security high ground, you seem like a pretty angry elf.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:12 pm to Korin
I'm not counting wins or championships when just a bunch of skinny white dudes played. It's not like baseball where AA's make a small % of the game. Black males dominate the sport, and counting stats your team did in the 40's is laughable.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:12 pm to AUCE05
quote:
What is considered modern college football? Before/after black people were allowed to play?
The invention of the forward pass

Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:13 pm to Chronic
I-A Winning Percentage 1984-2013 (30 years)
(Teams not qualifying for the table are listed at the bottom)
---- ----------------------- ------- ---- ---- ---- -----
Rank Team name Win-Pct Won Lost Tied Games
---- ----------------------- ------- ---- ---- ---- -----
1 Boise State 0.77632 177 51 0 228
2 Florida State 0.77384 282 81 4 367
3 Nebraska 0.76447 290 89 1 380
4 Ohio State 0.75208 269 87 5 361
5 Miami-Florida 0.75204 276 91 0 367
6 Florida 0.74000 276 96 3 375
7 Oklahoma 0.73458 272 97 4 373
8 Michigan 0.71024 261 105 5 371
9 Auburn 0.69429 253 110 5 368
10 Tennessee 0.68733 252 113 6 371
11 Georgia 0.68464 252 115 4 371
12 Texas 0.68157 250 116 3 369
13 Brigham Young 0.68146 260 121 2 383
14 Southern Cal 0.67549 240 114 5 359
15 Virginia Tech 0.67432 248 119 3 370
16 Louisiana State 0.67302 245 118 4 367
17 Alabama 0.67090 237 116 1 354
18 Texas A&M 0.66125 243 124 2 369
19 Oregon 0.65934 240 124 0 364
20 Notre Dame 0.65847 240 124 2 366
21 Clemson 0.64986 237 127 3 367
I used 30 years to show just how competitive the Big 7 have been. Adjusting for championships would give different results.
(Teams not qualifying for the table are listed at the bottom)
---- ----------------------- ------- ---- ---- ---- -----
Rank Team name Win-Pct Won Lost Tied Games
---- ----------------------- ------- ---- ---- ---- -----
1 Boise State 0.77632 177 51 0 228
2 Florida State 0.77384 282 81 4 367
3 Nebraska 0.76447 290 89 1 380
4 Ohio State 0.75208 269 87 5 361
5 Miami-Florida 0.75204 276 91 0 367
6 Florida 0.74000 276 96 3 375
7 Oklahoma 0.73458 272 97 4 373
8 Michigan 0.71024 261 105 5 371
9 Auburn 0.69429 253 110 5 368
10 Tennessee 0.68733 252 113 6 371
11 Georgia 0.68464 252 115 4 371
12 Texas 0.68157 250 116 3 369
13 Brigham Young 0.68146 260 121 2 383
14 Southern Cal 0.67549 240 114 5 359
15 Virginia Tech 0.67432 248 119 3 370
16 Louisiana State 0.67302 245 118 4 367
17 Alabama 0.67090 237 116 1 354
18 Texas A&M 0.66125 243 124 2 369
19 Oregon 0.65934 240 124 0 364
20 Notre Dame 0.65847 240 124 2 366
21 Clemson 0.64986 237 127 3 367
I used 30 years to show just how competitive the Big 7 have been. Adjusting for championships would give different results.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:16 pm to NorthEndZone
Alabama
Tennessee
Florida
LSU
Georgia
Auburn
A&M
Arky
Ole miss
Mizzou
UK
South Carolina
Miss state
Vandy
Tennessee
Florida
LSU
Georgia
Auburn
A&M
Arky
Ole miss
Mizzou
UK
South Carolina
Miss state
Vandy
Posted on 1/20/14 at 5:17 pm to AUCE05
quote:
I'm not counting wins or championships when just a bunch of skinny white dudes played. It's not like baseball where AA's make a small % of the game. Black males dominate the sport, and counting stats your team did in the 40's is laughable.
Discrediting a programs success during segregation is ignorant and I feel sorry for you.
Popular
Back to top
