Started By
Message
re: How can this happen with a cupcake schedule?
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:30 pm to antibarner
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:30 pm to antibarner
quote:
antibarner
0
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:31 pm to antibarner
quote:
Auburn fans obsess constantly about Alabama.
Your goddamn username is Auburn-related
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:32 pm to WDE24
I have explained where this name came from. One of your former ITAT mods, one Krusty the Klown, used to go by The Antibammer on an old board we both used to post on.
In the interest of balance(and because he didn't like it) I started using this name and have ever since.
So an AUBIE was the cause of this.
In the interest of balance(and because he didn't like it) I started using this name and have ever since.
So an AUBIE was the cause of this.
This post was edited on 7/31/14 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:34 pm to craigbiggio
And by the way, God's last name is not damn. Potty mouth.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:34 pm to antibarner
Yet you make a long winded post about Auburn
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:35 pm to antibarner
quote:
So an AUBIE was the cause of this.
Sounds obsessive
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:35 pm to antibarner
You seem more obsessed with AU fans than you do with Bama. Your explanation of your user name further confirms that opinion.
Which makes your posts about obsessed AU fans ironic in a funny and sad way.
Which makes your posts about obsessed AU fans ironic in a funny and sad way.
This post was edited on 7/31/14 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:36 pm to WDE24
this thread is worse than mine from yesterday. I caught cancer from this thread.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:37 pm to antibarner
quote:
ALL Aubie cares about is Alabama.
quote:
Auburn fans obsess constantly about Alabama.
quote:
its the same pack of hyenas on here that come running to contest what is posted.
ironic
quote:
antibarner
Melt Day: ?
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:38 pm to WDE24
So with Bama at 7-6 against good teams, doesnt it actually prove that if they played a tough schedule they would have no chance in hell? For example, in 2011 they went 2-1 against teams with a pulse. If they played LSUs schedule I assume they would have had two losses in the regular season
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:42 pm to coachcrisp
It happens because you play a cupcake schedule which gets you to the NC, where you play a joke of a team like ND and get credit for a top 5 win
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:42 pm to antibarner
God damn
Jesus fricking Christ
Mary twat magdalene
frick you
Jesus fricking Christ
Mary twat magdalene
frick you
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:43 pm to Korin
quote:
They will consider last year a total success even though in the end they were the team that broke the SEC streak. At Alabama had we won the IB and gone on to lose the BCS last year would be considered a huge disappointment.
Doesn't get more typical than this.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 2:55 pm to NYCAuburn
U dumb
Posted on 7/31/14 at 3:47 pm to NickSabanRules
quote:
They also have 72 wins in the last 6 years, which has never in a 6 year period before.
If you mean has never been done by Alabama you are correct. If you mean hasn't been done in college football, you are incorrect.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:01 pm to antibarner
quote:
I have explained where this name came from. One of your former ITAT mods, one Krusty the Klown, used to go by The Antibammer on an old board we both used to post on.
In the interest of balance(and because he didn't like it) I started using this name and have ever since.
So an AUBIE was the cause of this.
Just in case anyone misunderstands: he calls himself 'antiBARNER' on the SEC Rant because about 8-9 years ago, an AU fan none of you know once made up an alter called 'antiBAMMER' on a board none of you have ever visited.
But he's not obsessed with AU. No, not at all. Why, it's sheer madness to even think that.
Don't ever change, anti.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:05 pm to boxedlunch
quote:
If you mean has never been done by Alabama you are correct. If you mean hasn't been done in college football, you are incorrect.
You'll get a kick out of this - an Alabama fan here was comparing the FWAA to the Houlgate.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:52 pm to Korin
quote:
You'll get a kick out of this - an Alabama fan here was comparing the FWAA to the Houlgate.
That's interesting. I guess you say what you have to if you're justifying your existence. I suppose anybody who doesn't know the history of Football Writers might downgrade it.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 5:02 pm to boxedlunch
Starts at the bottom of page 5 of this thread.
https://www.secrant.com/rant/display.aspx?p=51265832&pg=5
"The FWAA is one of many minor polls. Your 1964 claim is barely any more legit than Bama fans claiming 1941,"
https://www.secrant.com/rant/display.aspx?p=51265832&pg=5
"The FWAA is one of many minor polls. Your 1964 claim is barely any more legit than Bama fans claiming 1941,"
Posted on 7/31/14 at 5:06 pm to Korin
quote:
"The FWAA is one of many minor polls. Your 1964 claim is barely any more legit than Bama fans claiming 1941,"
Yeah, typical response of someone who has no clue. Most people believe the AP/UPI only myth because it's what they've grown up with and most people don't care to research this stuff.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News