Started By
Message
re: Help Me Understand This
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:03 pm to JudgeHolden
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:03 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Who owns the stadium
Literally doesn't matter.
I can rent out the courthouse and make my own rules about the dress code.
0
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:04 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
your
You're.
Call the guvnah, call the AG!
What a bunch of twats you Loserana folks are.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:05 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
If that’s true I can ban Ole Miss colors wholesale at LSU.
Working on the bill.
I'd recommend not drafting a bill, because then it would literally be the government restricting free speech.
Just kick out people wearing those colors.
Again, assuming that LSU events are organized and managed by a private organization.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:05 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Dress codes are not directed at an identifiable group.
Bans on blue are absolutely directed at the Crips gang.
Bans on red are absolutely diected at the Bloods gang.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:05 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
Assuming that, like Ole Miss, the gameday operations are managed by a non-governmental organization, sure.
Under your logic, the NGO could ban black people. You think that works? Oh wait. Maybe you do.
You can’t ban people from state property by saying a private entity manages it.
Is this all you got?
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:06 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Under your logic, the NGO could ban black people.
No, because they're a protected group.
People wearing yellow and purple are not.
Glad I could clear this up for you.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:07 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
I'd recommend not drafting a bill, because then it would literally be the government restricting free speech.
The government at ole Miss is banning people from state property under color of law. It doesn’t matter what toady organization they get to do it.
This is gonna be a blast.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:08 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:Great. It's the SFP of the SEC Rant. What a fricking dipshit
JudgeHolden
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:08 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
It doesn’t matter what toady organization they get to do it.
It absolutely does. A private organization - in this case a 501c3 corporation - can ban anybody as long as they aren't doing it on the basis of sex, age, race, national origin, or religion.
Sorry, bud.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:09 pm to JudgeHolden
Be sure to start a thread on the Tiger Rant announcing it.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:10 pm to jonnyanony
Deliberately obtuse.
You are banning speech.
Your logic is that you can do it because a non-state actor manages the property.
You said it was because it wasn’t the state.
Now you are shifting to a different 1A analysis.
If your logic holds, the NGO could punish LSU fans for cheering under the theory that it’s not the state doing it.
I think that will make it into my brief.
You are banning speech.
Your logic is that you can do it because a non-state actor manages the property.
You said it was because it wasn’t the state.
Now you are shifting to a different 1A analysis.
If your logic holds, the NGO could punish LSU fans for cheering under the theory that it’s not the state doing it.
I think that will make it into my brief.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:12 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Deliberately obtuse.
Nope, legally settled.
quote:
Your logic is that you can do it because a non-state actor manages the property.
Not my logic. The logic of the Supreme Court.
quote:
You said it was because it wasn’t the state.
Because it wasn't.
quote:
the NGO could punish LSU fans for cheering under the theory that it’s not the state doing it.
They could.
quote:
I think that will make it into my brief.
I feel like you're dropping a lot of thing into your briefs right now.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:12 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
I may take this case.
It’s a time-place-manner restriction, reasonably and narrowly drawn to achieve a compelling public interest in public safety.
Good luck with your case. Let us know how it turns out.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:12 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
A private organization
Not a private organization managing state property on behalf of the state.
Sorry bud. You can’t hide behind tha fiction.
Could this private organization prohibit LSU fans from cheering? How’s that different.
You all are making my OA outline for me.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:13 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Deliberately obtuse.
shite, it is SFP.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:13 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Not a private organization managing state property on behalf of the state.
Yes. They pay the school directly. It's effectively a rental.
quote:
Could this private organization prohibit LSU fans from cheering?
Yes.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:13 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
feel like you're dropping a lot of thing into your briefs right now.
My briefs are loaded, my friend.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:14 pm to jonnyanony
You’ve got to be kidding. Good luck with that.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:14 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
My briefs are loaded, my friend.
Yes, we can smell it.
Posted on 9/18/26 at 9:15 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
You’ve got to be kidding. Good luck with that.
Bro you're the one bloviating about some 1st Amendment case against a private organization.
I'm not the one who needs luck. This has been challenged and reaffirmed a bazillion times.
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News