Started By
Message
Grier has filed appeal, says substance was approved by NCAA (update in OP)
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:47 am
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:47 am
From BR
quote:
His suspension began October 12, and according to Wednesday's report, his legal team will argue he had no knowledge the supplement that triggered the positive test contained a substance banned by the NCAA. His lawyers will also reportedly argue that the supplement itself was NCAA approved
This post was edited on 11/4/15 at 1:14 pm
21
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:48 am to joshnorris14
Just now? Why did it take so long?
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:48 am to joshnorris14
Can you ask him what it was at GNC that he took? I would love to gain 40 pounds of muscle in 6 months.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:49 am to joshnorris14
Shouldn't you guys just be happy that they did not make you vacate wins for playing a roided out QB?
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:49 am to joshnorris14
If he didn't think it was illegal, he would have ordered it through UF and gotten it for free.
Unless he's just an idiot.
Unless he's just an idiot.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:50 am to craigbiggio
quote:I'm betting some scumbag lawyer wants publicity so he offered to do it pro bono. I hate our legal system most of the time.
Just now? Why did it take so long?
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:50 am to joshnorris14
Shame on whoever told him roids were legal.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:51 am to Solo Cam
He gained 43 pounds in 38 months. Must be roids
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:51 am to joshnorris14
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:52 am to Solo Cam
quote:
I'm betting some scumbag lawyer wants publicity so he offered to do it pro bono. I hate our legal system most of the time.
It's not UFs typical attorney, it's our punters father and the Morgan and Morgan law firm
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:53 am to joshnorris14
quote:
Appealing on the basis he was given the info that the substance wasn't banned.
I wonder how that's going to work. Coaching and training staffs at the respective schools usually handle education on substances and the NCAA makes those lists available through the NCAA website. Is he saying either Florida staff told him it was ok or he saw via the website that it's ok?
quote:
Also will deal with the harshness of the NCAAs penalty in general
It's a pretty standard, cut and dry suspension based on rules that have been established by the NCAA for awhile now. I don't see where he'll get much headway there.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:54 am to craigbiggio
quote:
Just now? Why did it take so long?
Duh. Gotta wait until the 'roids clear his system.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:55 am to joshnorris14
If he didn't know it was prohibited, why won't he tell us what he took?
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:55 am to joshnorris14
quote:
Morgan and Morgan law firm
For the people.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:57 am to Vols&Shaft83
He doesn't even know what he took. He was snorting back alley supplements.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:57 am to joshnorris14
Why do teams have to forfeit wins when a player gets paid but not when they take banned performance enhancing drugs? How does that make sense? Ones an actually on the field advantage one isn't.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:58 am to joshnorris14
Without roids the 4th and 14 pass would have skipped into the ground.
tStreak is over amirite
tStreak is over amirite
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:58 am to joshnorris14
quote:
Morgan and Morgan law firm
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:58 am to Patton
One player is ineligible, one isn't
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:58 am to Patton
quote:
Why do teams have to forfeit wins when a player gets paid but not when they take banned performance enhancing drugs? How does that make sense? Ones an actually on the field advantage one isn't.
It's the NCAA. Logic is lost at the door.
Page 1 of 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News