
Started By
Message
re: Georgia should pull a Notre Dame
Posted on 11/11/26 at 11:38 am to Violent Hip Swivel
Posted on 11/11/26 at 11:38 am to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
You are struggling pretty good this morning.
8.6 million subtracted by 6.8 million = a half million
Math is hard for some.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 11:39 am to BamaBravesPackers
quote:
Wait until the 1 year an unnecessary OOC game unexpectedly leaves your university out of the playoffs at 8-4 or 7-5. OSU is probably 1 more loss from being outside the top 24 and they didn’t have to schedule the UTx game.
I get that, but we had games with ND, Clemson and other teams when there was a 4 team playoff format and a 12 team format. The better traditional teams (Alabama, Georgia, Texas, Ohio State, Michigan, LSU, etc will be top 24 without any trouble the vast majority of time.
When was the last time Alabama was not in the top 24 teams? Or Georgia or Ohio State? And, look at the schedules when we had a 4 team playoff system and almost every team had premier matchups at least from time to time.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 11:41 am to IT_Dawg
If Georgia really wants to do it the right way...Stay in the Conference and collect that confetence check, but in addition, sign a 20 year 300 million dollar deal for your own sports network. Maybe Georgia could call it "The Bulldog Network", TBN for short. Huh, huh, huh?
Posted on 11/11/26 at 11:45 am to IT_Dawg
Georgia or any other University leaving the SEC is just plain dumb.
I can't believe people even entertain those thoughts.
I can't believe people even entertain those thoughts.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 11:54 am to JCdawg
quote:
Math is hard for some.
Reading comprehension and analytical thought are even harder, especially for UGA fans apparently.
Taking the 6 best years in UGA football history and including years that Texas wasn’t good or even in the SEC is certainly a good way to prove UGA’s brand is on par with Bama and Texas
You can lead a dawg to water…
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:05 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
I get that, but we had games with ND, Clemson and other teams when there was a 4 team playoff format and a 12 team format. The better traditional teams (Alabama, Georgia, Texas, Ohio State, Michigan, LSU, etc will be top 24 without any trouble the vast majority of time. When was the last time Alabama was not in the top 24 teams? Or Georgia or Ohio State? And, look at the schedules when we had a 4 team playoff system and almost every team had premier matchups at least from time to time.
All of this was before 9 game SEC schedule was known, and back when you had to worry a little bit about fighting your way into a 4 team playoff (see 2023 FSU vs 2017 Bama and 2021 UGA).
The mindset has only recently changed to don’t schedule your way out of the playoffs, after seeing Indiana get so heavily rewarded 2 years in a row.
I will say, the committee seems to be factoring in SOS much more now, so maybe that helps turn the tide. Don’t think Bama has canceled our OSU matchups yet.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:18 pm to BamaBravesPackers
quote:
UGA isn’t even in the top 3 SEC schools this year for viewership. Imagine if they weren’t in the SEC and drawing all the eyeballs from Bama, Texas, Tenn, FL, etc. They’d sink to nothingness and be forced to join a conference. Heck, UTx couldn’t even survive having their own network while in a conference and no one is making that 100mm+ mistake again.
The top 2 draws are clearly Bama and UTx depending on who has the better schedule (Bama #1 last year, UTx going to be #1 this year). With Kiffin at LSU, UGA is essentially fighting for 3rd for the time being and probably won’t win that many times in the near future.
Winning on the field is all that matters. UGA is 5-2 Against Alabama and Texas since Texas Joined the SEC in arguably the worst seasons UGA has had since 2021 and, in the case of Texas, the best seasons they have had in about a 1/4 century...TVs in bars and restaurants being tuned in with no one paying attention means nothing compared to results on the field....
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:31 pm to IT_Dawg
UGA and Oklahoma are largely responsible for the current state of affairs in CFB attributable to television......good, bad or indifferent they sued the NCAA and won allowing conferences to negotiate their own broadcast deals.
That lawsuit and decision is going to make it damn near impossible for a conference to sign a CBA with member schools in the opinion of many legal scholars and lawyers...the same anti-trust exemption the NCAA "claimed" is almost identical to what conferences are trying to claim they currently have. While it is ludicrous to suggest UGA, for instance, should leave the SEC it may soon be the only way ANY program is able to make a network deal and more to the point is going to make it damn difficult for a CBA between players and anyone other than the individual school which is going to further convolute CFB. Without some regulating body which can somehow wrangle a similar anti-trust style exemption that pro leagues enjoy it is going to be almost impossible to find a legal way to regulate college athletics. Congress can do anything they want to but that too will have to stand up to the scrutiny of the courts....its a mess. LSU and Texas Tech weren't wrong this season, they were just first....
That lawsuit and decision is going to make it damn near impossible for a conference to sign a CBA with member schools in the opinion of many legal scholars and lawyers...the same anti-trust exemption the NCAA "claimed" is almost identical to what conferences are trying to claim they currently have. While it is ludicrous to suggest UGA, for instance, should leave the SEC it may soon be the only way ANY program is able to make a network deal and more to the point is going to make it damn difficult for a CBA between players and anyone other than the individual school which is going to further convolute CFB. Without some regulating body which can somehow wrangle a similar anti-trust style exemption that pro leagues enjoy it is going to be almost impossible to find a legal way to regulate college athletics. Congress can do anything they want to but that too will have to stand up to the scrutiny of the courts....its a mess. LSU and Texas Tech weren't wrong this season, they were just first....
Posted on 11/11/26 at 12:58 pm to TS1926
quote:
And over the last 15-20 years, most of the student body has been from out of state. And even from above the Mason-Dixon line.
I know a professor at UA and he told me 5% of the current student body is from California. I don't know if that's accurate but it's rather unbelievable.
Yeah, Alabama went really hard in the paint recruiting out-of-state students in your time frame. I think (not positive if it is now, but it definitely was recently) over 50% of Bama's undergrad student body is OOS. Not sure what the reason was, but if I had to guess, it would be more money since they charge OOS students more.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 1:22 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
Leave the SEC in football, just play your 6 games a year against the SEC “rivals,”and sign a lucrative contract as a solo school that still plays elite competition
Without the championship game, who gives a shite about the conference you are in. Get around all the “rules” the SEC puts in place.
Meh, actually I don’t care. Never thought I would say this in my life, but after this year, college football will be on the back burner for Saturdays now. Kinda sad we got here.
I wish you would just so I could point and laugh at you.
#1. You aren't getting 6 games a year against SEC schools. You'll be lucky to keep Auburn and Florida. And most likely you'll lose Florida since they already have an OOC rival game every year.
And you'll struggle completely on filling your schedule in the middle of the year. You'll have to pay teams to come play you as everyone else is in conference play. You are not Notre Dame who established rival games over the past 80 years.
#2. The conference championship game didn't even exist until 1992.
#3. Georgia will struggle to get a TV deal. Notre Dame has NBC and it's the only team NBC broadcasts. You do not have a big draw. All these posts talking about this year Georgia's numbers were big are doing it BACKWARDS. Those numbers come from a schedule and the other big name teams, not just Georgia. If you want to look at real Georgia viewership then look at the numbers from the worst games where only Georgia is a name.
It's funny that your entire premise is based on getting a SEC schedule and benefits while not being in the SEC.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 1:24 pm to PeleofAnalytics
quote:
I saw last night ND Miami had the most when they added Peacock which isn't tracked by Neilsen.
ABC also has streaming on ESPN that I'm assuming wasn't counted.
No idea what those numbers are.
People are comparing the wrong games though. It's not about your most viewed games, which brings in viewership of other teams. It's about your viewership numbers when you aren't playing anyone.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 1:54 pm to IT_Dawg
We should all pull a notre dame
being in the SEC makes it harder to win a national championship full stop
being in the SEC makes it harder to win a national championship full stop
Posted on 11/11/26 at 2:32 pm to BamaBravesPackers
quote:
All of this was before 9 game SEC schedule was known, and back when you had to worry a little bit about fighting your way into a 4 team playoff (see 2023 FSU vs 2017 Bama and 2021 UGA).
Fair point, but like you said we had to fight our way to a 4 team playoff. Now it will be a 24 team playoff, and less pressure.
Almost every single year there have been more than 1 or 2 four loss teams in the top 24 teams. In 2023 there were 8.
quote:And I understand that mindset....when we were in a 4 or 12 team playoff system. But 24? You will have to work awfully hard not to make a 24 team playoff. If Alabama scheduled Florida State in a 12 team playoff format, why would they hesitate in a 24 team playoff format?
The mindset has only recently changed to don’t schedule your way out of the playoffs, after seeing Indiana get so heavily rewarded 2 years in a row.
In 2021, when we were in a 4 team playoff format Georgia scheduled Clemson. In 2017, also a year in a 4 team playoff format, Alabama scheduled FSU.
I mean, if teams were doing it under a 4 team and 12 team format, why would they hesitate in a 24 team playoff?
Posted on 11/11/26 at 2:34 pm to IT_Dawg
You people need to stop bitching and complaining. That 24 team playoff bracket on the McAfee show today looked absolutely beautiful
Posted on 11/11/26 at 2:59 pm to BamaBravesPackers
SEC games average roughly 4.9–5.2 million viewers, well ahead of the Big Ten (around 2.3–2.8M), and the conference accounts for a large share of total college football viewing time. Marquee SEC matchups (especially Georgia-Alabama, Red River Rivalry, Alabama-LSU, and Texas vs. other power brands) routinely produce the highest individual audiences in the sport.Bottom line: Texas has the highest current averages, but Alabama and Georgia are the most reliable long-term draws, with Oklahoma and LSU right behind them as major national brands. From SuperGrok AI
Posted on 11/11/26 at 3:07 pm to XenScott
quote:
A lot of schools could pull it off if you are winning but a few lean years would kill it.
ND, Texas, Alabama could pull it off but that's about it.
Ohio State could do it simply because they would have the same formula as Texas...Giant in state following to bolster the lean years.
As you say... Bama probably would fall off with lean years as the national bandwagoners moved on.
When OU and Georgia sued the NCAA in the early 1980s for property rights to games... ABC (who had the contract with the NCAA)... actually talked to OU officials because they weren't sure how the new model would work out. They actually had informal discussions with OU about doing an exclusive contract with OU (and maybe a couple of other high profile teams)... but they came to the conclusion that it wouldn't work.
Ultimately some conferences and the CFA produced collective packages to market the networks.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 3:08 pm to koreandawg
quote:
LSU fool.
Tautology.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 3:11 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
UGA doesn’t have a national following.
I have several friends & former coworkers in CT who root for the Dawgs!
Posted on 11/11/26 at 6:53 pm to Che Boludo
I don't disagree, just reporting what he conveyed. He did specifically mention Chicago. Tons of people at UA were from there. In his apartment complex. He said they were fine, just not southern. He didn't really elaborate on what exactly that meant.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 6:58 pm to IT_Dawg
Only “ national brand” L4u could pull that off.

Popular
Back to top


1








