Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:08 pm to Veritas
quote:
Does competition in the SEC cross interstate lines?
Is that illegal?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:09 pm to vidtiger23
quote:
That’s the dumbest statement I’ve ever heard on the rant lol
Everyone in every thread is better off ignoring this Boom33 dude.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:09 pm to Veritas
quote:
So why is the SEC holding a vote to expel LSU?
Because the other schools do not believe LSU has principles consistent to it's own.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:09 pm to Boom33
Ok, so you just have no clue what you are talking about here.
Got it. We can move on.
Got it. We can move on.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:10 pm to Boom33
quote:
Because the other schools do not believe LSU has principles consistent to it's own.
Based on what?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:10 pm to Brotorious
quote:
The same SEC that let a 2 year pro basketball player play for Alabama basketball? SEC is fricked!
The SEC was against that the entire time.
Try again.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:10 pm to Veritas
It’s as if you don’t read the posts above.
I don’t know if it’s Sankey driving this or if it’s the schools’ leadership driving this.
But all I can tell you is that that judge in Baton Rouge put the entire conference at risk. Either bleed a slow death, piece by piece, where everything is challenged and local judges decide in favor of the schools…
…. or take this thing head on and get something decided now.
The fact that you need everything spelled out for you is another story…
I don’t know if it’s Sankey driving this or if it’s the schools’ leadership driving this.
But all I can tell you is that that judge in Baton Rouge put the entire conference at risk. Either bleed a slow death, piece by piece, where everything is challenged and local judges decide in favor of the schools…
…. or take this thing head on and get something decided now.
The fact that you need everything spelled out for you is another story…
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:11 pm to AGGIES
Ok, so you are making the direct connection that Baton Rouge judge = LSU
Got it.
So now I can come to the conclusion that Brazos County = Texas A&M
You really think that is fair?
Got it.
quote:
Brazos County Judge John Brick and Dallas County Judge Martin Hoffman ordered temporary restraining orders (TROs) for Texas A&M basketball players regarding their eligibility against the NCAA and SEC.
So now I can come to the conclusion that Brazos County = Texas A&M
You really think that is fair?
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 8:13 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:12 pm to Veritas
quote:
Ok, so you just have no clue what you are talking about here.
Got it. We can move on.
He's Simple Jack.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:13 pm to Veritas
quote:
Stop signing your posts like it's an email. It makes you look like an idiot Rodo.
Rodo is the Hodor of SEC Rant.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:13 pm to AGGIES
quote:
But all I can tell you is that that judge in Baton Rouge put the entire conference at risk. Either bleed a slow death, piece by piece, where everything is challenged and local judges decide in favor of the schools…
…. or take this thing head on and get something decided now.
The fact that you need everything spelled out for you is another story…
That judge did nothing more than any of the other home cooking judges.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:13 pm to Veritas
quote:
Based on what?
The actions (or inactions) of the university to uphold the standards the rest of the conference agrees to.
Are you trying to claim LSU has a right to be in the SEC? That the SEC must allow and keep any school that wishes to be included?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:14 pm to Boom33
quote:
He said he would comply with court rulings.
No he literally said he would comply with SEC rules.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:14 pm to SidewalkTiger
It's such a low IQ disingenuous argument. It's drive by media takes. It's disgusting and shows no understanding of the complexity of the issue.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:14 pm to Veritas
quote:
Ok, so you just have no clue what you are talking about here.
Got it. We can move on.
It's ok, you can admit it. There is nothing illegal about it. Jurisdiction was never in question.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:14 pm to Boom33
quote:
The SEC was against that the entire time.
Try again.
You keep saying that and the facts keep being that they still let it happen.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:15 pm to Boom33
quote:
The SEC was against that the entire time.
Of course. Of course. They didn’t know anything. That’s right.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:15 pm to Rodo
quote:
Dumbass AG ratcheting up the rhetoric when she should be trying to create calm. How about some self-reflection La? Rodo
Read the room, Aggie
Who’s ratcheting the rhetoric again?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:15 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
You keep saying that and the facts keep being that they still let it happen.
The SEC also still allowed you to have those players at practice.
What's your point? Want to punish Alabama, be my guest.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News