1
Started By
Message
re: For anyone interested: Louisiana AG makes radio appearance to break down case
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:19 pm to NussBusDriver
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:19 pm to NussBusDriver
quote:
No he literally said he would comply with SEC rules.
If the court rulings were reversed was the rest of it.
LSU's Lane Kiffin awaits courtroom decision before following SEC's orders: We're focused on Clemson
quote:
Kiffin said if the court order is reversed that LSU would "absolutely" following the SEC's eligibility rules.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:20 pm to Scruffy
quote:
There is no control by any governing bodies.
Everything is controlled by random courts.
It seems like a lot of the problem is their rules contradict actual law and selective enforcement has also been a problem.
It's what sunk the NCAA and will eventually sink the conferences.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:22 pm to Boom33
quote:
Kiffin said if the court order is reversed that LSU would "absolutely" following the SEC's eligibility rules.
Ok, so why are we here? The court order was not reversed and he still followed SEC rules.
What are we doing?
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:23 pm to Veritas
quote:LSU was simply unlucky.
That does not mean LSU is your guinea pig to threaten expulsion over.
They tried this first.
The SEC is trying to maintain what little control they have left.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:23 pm to Veritas
quote:
No, I am asking you to tell me what SEC rule LSU broke that warrants a vote to expel them.
Or are you implying the SEC should just be able to do this whenever they want when a member does not violate SEC rules? That's really the type of league you want?
What you are asking is not a requirement for them to vote LSU out.
Again, I've said it multiple times - I do not think LSU will be kicked out. I think these are warning shots.
I'm merely entertaining the idea for the purpose of debate and to understand the situation.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:24 pm to Scruffy
quote:
They tried this first.
Tried what? Recruited "Pro Players" under a court order granting them eligibility? Just like Ole Miss and South Carolina?
What are we even talking about?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:24 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
That judge did nothing more than any of the other home cooking judges.
You don’t have to convince me of that.
It actually reinforces my position that if we just play whataboutism to justify continued flaunting of rules in perpetuity, then it just devolves into lawlessness of greater proportions.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:24 pm to Veritas
quote:
The court order was not reversed
It’s being appealed and a motion to dissolve/vacate the injunction have been filed. It might go away, or it might not. Either way, the case in Louisiana is far from over.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:24 pm to stitchop
quote:
Miss is really behind in this area
Even CLFK pointed this out as a reason he left Old Myth.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:25 pm to Brotorious
quote:
Of course. Of course. They didn’t know anything. That’s right.
What? The SEC was publicly against this.
Hell it might have been Alabama at the point of all this if the court hadn't shut it down in the 2nd hearing. Probably saved Alabama's arse really.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:26 pm to Boom33
So what is the SEC's reason for having this vote?
There is no coming back from a vote or consideration of a vote of a chartered member for something that didn't actually happen.
There is no coming back from a vote or consideration of a vote of a chartered member for something that didn't actually happen.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:27 pm to Veritas
quote:
Ok, so why are we here? The court order was not reversed and he still followed SEC rules.
What are we doing?
You only followed the rules because of the SEC's lawsuit.
You left spots open in case you win.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:28 pm to Veritas
Let's say the SEC does kick LSU out, does that open the SEC and its members up for claims of damages from LSU coaches/players/fans/vendors/etc.?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:28 pm to Veritas
quote:
So what is the SEC's reason for having this vote?
There is no coming back from a vote or consideration of a vote of a chartered member for something that didn't actually happen.
What's LSU going to do? Leave.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:29 pm to Boom33
quote:
You only followed the rules because of the SEC's lawsuit.
Prove that.
quote:
You left spots open in case you win.
Prove that.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:29 pm to Rodo
She is not a dumbass . If Sankey wants lawsuits that blow up the SEC … so be it . Bring it .
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:30 pm to Boom33
No, the damage done by Sankey is terrible.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:30 pm to Veritas
quote:
Prove that.
Proof is not required for the vote, it's not a criminal court case.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:30 pm to Veritas
quote:
No, the damage done by Sankey is terrible.
What damage?
Your hurt feelings?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:30 pm to Boom33
quote:
Proof is not required for the vote, it's not a criminal court case.
What a piece of shite response.
Page 5 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News