Started By
Message

re: Final Strength of Schedule rankings

Posted on 12/7/25 at 3:50 pm to
Posted by Dougiejurgens3
Member since Nov 2023
331 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 3:50 pm to
Any computer ranking that has Penn state at #20 is broken beyond belief
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
37310 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 3:50 pm to
I'm not sure if Texas is next in line or who is, but I agree the DEI additions shouldn't be there.

And I also agree SoS should matter more, which would probably have Texas in if I had to guess.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
37310 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Any computer ranking that has Penn state at #20 is broken beyond belief


Power rankings vs season rankings.

Posted by TexasOnTop
Member since Nov 2023
6401 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

So you think Texas with it's 9-3 record should be in above Alabama with it's 10-3 record?


No. But Texas should be in over Miami. Miami has the common opponent advantage (Florida) but has 2 bad losses (Louisville and SMU) and only 1 top 15 win where Texas has 3.
Posted by Sid E Walker
BackdoorU ©
Member since Nov 2013
25136 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

Indiana at #16 destroys your make belief SOS.

Who did IU play of note other than Oregon and tOSU (and only because it was the CCG)?

TIA.
Posted by 49 to nada
In aggy and gooner heads, rent free
Member since Sep 2023
5321 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 3:53 pm to
Forgot about Miami, but yeah...along with the 2 DEI additions thats 3 that shouldn't be in over Texas. We're being punished for making the football experts who pumped us preseason look like fools.
Posted by 1955
Member since Dec 2025
1 post
Posted on 12/7/25 at 3:55 pm to
Texas lost what the SOS indicated.
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
29232 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 3:56 pm to
Posted by TexasOnTop
Member since Nov 2023
6401 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

We're being punished for making the football experts who pumped us preseason look like fools.


I thought this a lot through the season. The AP poll hated us. Having us behind OU after we smacked them in a neutral site was the most telling part.
Posted by 1putt
Member since Sep 2024
981 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 4:00 pm to
If you believe BYU played a tougher schedule than Oklahoma, Georgia, Tennessee, and Missouri… Well, then bless your heart I guess.
This post was edited on 12/7/25 at 4:01 pm
Posted by prouddawg
Member since Sep 2024
7104 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Strength of Record


1. Indiana Hoosiers
2. Georgia Bulldogs
3, Texas A&M Aggies
4. Oregon Ducks
5. Ohio State Buckeyes
6. Ole Miss Rebels
7. Texas Tech Red Raiders
8. Oklahoma Sooners
9. BYU Cougars
10. Alabama Crimson Tide
11. Vanderbilt Commodores
12. Texas Longhorns


Looks a lot better than the current committee decision. Let’s make this the standard and just roll with it.
This post was edited on 12/7/25 at 4:08 pm
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
37310 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

If you believe BYU played a tougher schedule in Oklahoma, Georgia, Tennessee, and Missouri… Well, then bless your heart I guess.


Actually you do make a good point because I think the Big12 has somewhat of a bubble in their stats generally this year. I've been saying it all year and hoping it goes away, but doesn't look like it.

We need more games between conferences to pop the bubbles basically. Part of the reason I hate 9 game conference schedules and want to see more quality OOC games than less. These kinds of stats rely on those games being links between conferences.

The biggest thing that gives them the bump is playing Texas Tech twice, which it see's as a top5 team. Also I think it overvalues Utah and even BYU itself as part of that bubble.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
37310 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Man it sucks to have to deal with the smooth brains. No reading comprehension skills


The best part is his post currently has 6 upvotes and only 3 downvotes.

Posted by prouddawg
Member since Sep 2024
7104 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

the 2 DEI additions


I like it
Posted by msudawg1200
Central Mississippi
Member since Jun 2014
10665 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

48 Ole Miss - 1.35

Easiest in the SEC. This is why Lane is leaving. The 9 game schedule, and permanent opponents are going to end Ole Miss' easy cakewalks. He knew 7-5/8-4 is coming back so he struck while the iron was hot. Can't blame him for not wanting to be another Mark Stoops(who also benefited from soft schedules).
Posted by Dougiejurgens3
Member since Nov 2023
331 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Power rankings vs season rankings.


Any ranking whatsoever that has Penn state 20th is broken beyond belief
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
37310 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 4:14 pm to
quote:


Any ranking whatsoever that has Penn state 20th is broken beyond belief


Ok, well if you don't understand how it works, then that's fine. Move along.

Posted by QBUMizzou
North of the Mason Dixon line
Member since Nov 2013
685 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 4:16 pm to
Mizzou finished with #20 SOS after hearing everyone squeal like stuck pigs about our supposed weak schedule.

I’m so over the stupid SOS arguments at the beginning of and during the season. It’s best to wait til everything is played before even debating SOS because so much of it is based on faulty preseason rankings.

Again, the whole debate is an f-ing waste of time.

Posted by Jeepin_Josh
Nashville TN
Member since Jan 2024
547 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 4:17 pm to
Rebs also played 3 out of the 12 teams in the playoffs and went 2-1.

That one loss to GA we had the lead early in the 4th quarter..before the wheels came off.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
37310 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Mizzou finished with #20 SOS after hearing everyone squeal like stuck pigs about our supposed weak schedule.

I’m so over the stupid SOS arguments at the beginning of and during the season. It’s best to wait til everything is played before even debating SOS because so much of it is based on faulty preseason rankings.

Again, the whole debate is an f-ing waste of time.



Because you were all talking shite when you hadn't played any strong teams, and then you played the strong teams, you lost, and as a result of playing the stronger teams your SoS increased.

I mean that's the entire point people were pointing out your weak SoS to start with. To say you haven't played anyone yet. Now you can say you have played a tough schedule, and an 8-4 record to go with it.
This post was edited on 12/7/25 at 4:21 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter