Started By
Message
The next Cam!
1
Posted on 5/17/11 at 12:59 pm to diddydirtyAubie
They are annoying no doubt. But finding a way to win is the name of the game. I personally like traditional offenses, although I do like watching Oregon and offenses like that sometimes, but pro style offenses are more my style.
I think traditional offenses better prepare players, in certain positions, for the NFL better as well. Some positions it doesnt really matter, Wide recievers and RB's for example, but linemen and QB's especially have kind of a shock when they go from those fast pace offenses in college to the pro style in the NFL. Takes getting used to, but if they are good players they are gonna make the transition anyway, may just take longer.
I think traditional offenses better prepare players, in certain positions, for the NFL better as well. Some positions it doesnt really matter, Wide recievers and RB's for example, but linemen and QB's especially have kind of a shock when they go from those fast pace offenses in college to the pro style in the NFL. Takes getting used to, but if they are good players they are gonna make the transition anyway, may just take longer.
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:00 pm to UpstateCock2007
I'm sorry your defensive coordinator had 91 points hung up on his unit by a hurry up offense and then complains about how that offense is ruining football.
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:02 pm to Ross
quote:
I'm sorry your defensive coordinator had 91 points hung up on his unit by Cam Newton and then complains about how that offense is ruining football.
Fixed. Cam extending plays was what racked up the points. Not the hurry up offense. Cam single-handedly dominated us, and I am giving him credit for that and being a great player.
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:06 pm to UpstateCock2007
If it helps you sleep at night. Personally, I think our offensive line manhandling your defensive line played a pretty big role, along with your secondary being unable to cover any of our WRs.
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:07 pm to Ross
i seem to recall dyer having 100+ yds in that first game. im sure that had nothing to do with it
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:09 pm to Ross
quote:
I think our offensive line manhandling your defensive line played a pretty big role, along with your secondary being unable to cover any of our WRs.
Who needs an OL when Cam can drag 2-3 players and eventually break the tackles?
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:10 pm to CNB
quote:
Who needs an OL when Cam can drag 2-3 players and eventually break the tackles?
Thank you. We would get to Cam time and time again, and he would break free, complete a pass, or scramble for a big gain. Had not a single thing to do with the OL or hurry up offense.
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:14 pm to UpstateCock2007
how many yards did lattimore rush for?
This post was edited on 5/17/11 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:15 pm to blzr
around 40 the first game
around 90-95 the SECCG
around 90-95 the SECCG
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:15 pm to blzr
quote:
how many yards did lattimore rush for?
Because that has what to do with Auburn's OL or the hurry up offense?
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:16 pm to UpstateCock2007
Dude, on half of those plays Cam had enough time to slap together a PB&J while deciding what he wanted to do, and if he did pass the ball, your secondary was nowhere near the intended receiver. 
A good example of the offensive line play is the first touchdown of the SECCG. Just count the number of seconds he has to make a decision on that play. It's absolutely hilarious. And part of the reason your defense was so lackluster in that respect is your defensive coordinators idiotic use of a QB Spy. What on earth was he expecting that little dude to do even if he did get an accurate read on Newton?
A good example of the offensive line play is the first touchdown of the SECCG. Just count the number of seconds he has to make a decision on that play. It's absolutely hilarious. And part of the reason your defense was so lackluster in that respect is your defensive coordinators idiotic use of a QB Spy. What on earth was he expecting that little dude to do even if he did get an accurate read on Newton?
This post was edited on 5/17/11 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:18 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:I agree with this quote from Ellis.
It sounds like sour grapes right now
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:18 pm to Ross
But that still had something to do with the hurry up offense? I know our secondary sucked, esp in the SECCG against yall, but I am saying Cam had more to do with running up the score than anything else. And the first game was close. We had a shot to tie with 2 mins left.
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:20 pm to UpstateCock2007
quote:
With Barrett 5.5 in the 40 Trotter running the show? Sure.
Brandon "2-0 vs USCe" Cox laughs at this statement.
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:26 pm to parkjas2001
Does he yell at the neighborhood kids to get off his lawn too?
Posted on 5/17/11 at 1:44 pm to kage
What's funny is that Ellis Johnson is complaining about the hurry-up offense ruining the game when his players were faking injuries trying to slow down the hurry-up offense. Which is worse?
This post was edited on 5/17/11 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 5/17/11 at 2:03 pm to audodger
quote:
Cliff Ellis
Posted on 5/17/11 at 2:08 pm to WDE24
I laughed at that too. Wasnt he a bball coach for yall?
Posted on 5/17/11 at 2:08 pm to audodger
quote:
What's funny is that Cliff Ellis is complaining about the hurry-up offense ruining the game when his players were faking injuries trying to slow down the hurry-up offense.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News