Started By
Message

re: Early Signing period.

Posted on 12/18/17 at 8:30 am to
Posted by pioneerbasketball
Team Bunchie
Member since Oct 2005
132523 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 8:30 am to
I was for it but now I'm against it.

Finals, bowl game prep, new coaching jobs.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25753 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 8:39 am to
Anything that locks a kid in and strips his rights away is bad for the student athlete.

The coaching shite-show will be 3 months long (NFL jobs pulling college coaches continues the carousel into February).

Once Kirby gets his 20 early commits in the bag, his job is easier going into february.

If a kid wants to shut down his recruitment, tell the recruiters to leave him and his family alone. I swear to you that the coaches will respect that request up until there are coaching changes at his intended school. No coach wants to be called out publicly a family for harassment.
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
25223 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 8:57 am to
Its going to play havoc with college coaches jobs.

With the early signing period do you dare to wait till the end of the season to fire a bad coach? And if you do fire him early the pressure is on to announce your new guy... even though he's still coaching at his current school.

Not just head coaches but Coordinators too. If your OC has accepted a head coaching gig the pressure for him to start right away on emergency recruiting is going to be huge. Not an ideal situation if you are trying to get your team ready for a conference championship or big bowl game.

Schools that can establish some continuity, same head coach, same coordinators, are going to make out like bandits.
Posted by HogX
Madison, WI
Member since Dec 2012
5062 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 9:06 am to
It'll benefit non-power schools more than anybody, IMO. They'll be able to lock down the kids that typically would be getting an SEC offer when teams have to go to their backup options in February.
Posted by lowspark12
nashville, tn
Member since Aug 2009
22371 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 9:14 am to
quote:

It'll benefit non-power schools more than anybody, IMO. They'll be able to lock down the kids that typically would be getting an SEC offer when teams have to go to their backup options in February.


To an extent, maybe... at least for this year before P5 programs adjust.

The programs who have established relationships and solid committed classes are already moving on to “backup” plans... they’re just doing it now instead of a month from now.
Posted by JCinBAMA
North of Huntsville
Member since Oct 2009
17586 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 9:31 am to
By Bama not having to play in the SEC championship game gave them an extra week to work on recruiting.
Posted by HogX
Madison, WI
Member since Dec 2012
5062 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 9:31 am to
quote:

The programs who have established relationships and solid committed classes are already moving on to “backup” plans... they’re just doing it now instead of a month from now.



Still much better for the smaller schools to have 1.5 months to turn around and fill a class after that than have the rug pulled out from under them on signing day.
Posted by tigbit
Member since Jun 2011
2800 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 9:41 am to
Posted by BurgTiger
Member since Feb 2014
2771 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 9:44 am to
How many is every team expecting to sign? Mizzou looks to be signing about 19.
Posted by TIGERSPIKE
Member since Oct 2016
1445 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 9:47 am to
This is supposed to protect the rest of college football from the same 12 teams that dominate recruiting every year. Instead, I think you will see those elite recruiting teams raid the rest of college football even more so during the FEB signing day to get that last guy in a class.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60530 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 9:49 am to
UGA is projecting 17-21.

The Big question is hoe many assistant coaches announce new gigs on Thursday? That's what I find to be a BS move. Georgia would've totally missed out on Roquan Smith if his recruiter at UCLA hadnt gotten a job with the Falcons and the news leaked early.
Posted by bigDgator
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2008
41622 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 10:02 am to
I wish we had a recruiting board.
Posted by BlueBlood2020
Lexington, KY
Member since Sep 2017
557 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 10:30 am to
The only thing that would lock a kid in and strip away his rights is if he himself decided to go ahead and sign. Nobody is physically forcing these kids to sign early. Additionally, I'd project that at least 30% of them will all be enrolled for the spring semester anyway.
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13174 posts
Posted on 12/18/17 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Meh, they hay should already be in the barn long before now for the early signing period.


Should be and reality are often different.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter