Started By
Message
Do the rant posters think that Auburn DESERVES to be awarded the 2004 NC?
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:43 pm
If you had a chance to put in a vote, who would you vote to replace USC as 2004 CFB National Champion?
Auburn?
Utah?
Other teams?
Auburn?
Utah?
Other teams?
38
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:44 pm to MedDawg
oklahoma
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:44 pm to MedDawg
none
quote:
oklahoma
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:44 pm to MedDawg
I would vote Auburn.
But I don't think they should revote
But I don't think they should revote
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:45 pm to MedDawg
I wouldn't vote anyone. But if I had to then I guess I would vote Auburn.
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:46 pm to MedDawg
Yes. They finished second. Last time I checked when first is no longer first, everyone moves up a spot.
But this is college football with the most flawed way in the world to determine who is the best so what do you expect?
But this is college football with the most flawed way in the world to determine who is the best so what do you expect?
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:47 pm to MedDawg
Nobody else deserves it. USC played in and won the National Championship game. It would look completely retarded handing out the BCS championship to a team that did not even play in the game.
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:47 pm to MedDawg
The better question is, would Bama claim it if the rant voted them champs?
This post was edited on 6/6/11 at 10:49 pm
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:47 pm to MedDawg
Alabama, and it's not even close.
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:47 pm to happyhappyjoyjoy
quote:
I wouldn't vote anyone. But if I had to then I guess I would vote Auburn.
This
All homerism aside, if forced to. Auburn would be the choice.
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:48 pm to dextermccluskey
quote:
shocker
It's either Auburn, Oklahoma (got arse-raped in the NC), or Utah (mid-major). Wtf do you expect?
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:49 pm to AMM AU9893
quote:
Auburn
13-0
quote:
Oklahoma
12-1
quote:
Utah
13-0
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:49 pm to AMM AU9893
I would vote Auburn. The rape that was displayed in the NCG, and Jason White hobbling along the field is too much for me to ignore.
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:54 pm to auzach91
quote:
oklahoma
Oklahoma played in the national championship game, Auburn didn't. OU was ranked #2 going in before playing an ineligible team (USC). So, if the team were ineligible and USC could not have played, OU and AU would probably have played. We will never know, but OU could have beaten Auburn.
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:55 pm to MedDawg
I'd say give it to them - you know - before they take last year's away at some point.
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:55 pm to MedDawg
I don't believe in vacated wins. USC should keep the national championship. They were far and away the best team in CFB. Reggie Bush was only an ineligible player for one game that season which was the NC game and they would have killed Oklahoma or Auburn or any other team with or without Reggie Bush.
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:57 pm to MedDawg
There was only 2 teams that had the right to win the 2004 BCS title- OU and USC. If it isn't USC it has to be OU.
This post was edited on 6/6/11 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:57 pm to MedDawg
My vote is for the BCS to remain vacant and for the AP to give their title to AU.
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:58 pm to MedDawg
Oklahoma, Auburn, and Utah should all get a trophy...like they do in boxing.
Posted on 6/6/11 at 10:59 pm to Bench McElroy
That USC team was one of the best not only in 2004, but of all time, no one can say otherwise.
How they acquired that team is a different story...
How they acquired that team is a different story...
Page 1 of 12
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News