1
Started By
Message
re: Dallas says Sankey can't do anything to the coaches/institutions and see you in court
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:57 am to somethingdifferent
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:57 am to somethingdifferent
Isn't this a Texas District Court? Not federal. What jurisdiction does this court have outside of Texas?
Rodo
Rodo
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:15 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:
Don’t worry. I’ll do that for you.
Well he went to Texas law school so maybe you shouldn't haha
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:27 pm to tigerskin
Keep Dallas out of the SEC.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:47 pm to RidiculousHype
quote:
It's like your boss telling you in writing that you're allowed to take a 2-week vacation. Then you get back in town and fires you for taking the 2-week vacation, because they changed the policy while you were away.
It’s nothing like that at all.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:53 pm to tigerskin
Only real option Sankey had was to say teams that accept players will have a ten day window that existing players have to transfer somewhere else. It's not fair for a player to have transferred there thinking they would be playing and then having an NFL player take their place.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:01 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Well he went to Texas law school so maybe you shouldn't haha
Doesn't really change the fact that the guy is a joke of a lawyer.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:03 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:
Doesn't really change the fact that the guy is a joke of a lawyer.
Well, he got Pavia eligible in federal court against the NCAA.....
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:05 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Well, he got Pavia eligible in federal court against the NCAA.....
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:12 pm to Lynxrufus2012
quote:
he Chambliss ruling opened the door to all of this
No, not by a longshot. Pavia ruling is far more responsible and I wouldn't even say it was the one that opened to door either. The Chambliss ruling is merely challenging the NCAA's decision on a medical waiver. That isn't a new thing in college football, has happened for a very long time. The use of a TRO after multiple appeals is new, but his case isn't the first to do so either. That dates back to at least 2008.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:15 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
So when a court issues an order, people can just ignore it? No. It's effectively law
No, it is effectively a short-lived set of instructions. TRO's just halt things for a brief period due to a judge, sometimes incorrectly or sometimes correctly, thinking we need a pause on specific actions so an actual exploration of the matter can occur in very short order.
That is it . . there is no precedent or new standard or any long term change of any kind that occurs with a TRO.
Judges can, for example, issue restraining orders to prevent someone leaving the country in the run up to a trial. Is some new legal standard created where we are all blocked? Was a new law made?No.
Stop using the term "law" . . .you don't understand what it means.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 9:04 pm to tigerskin
You really think the SEC didn’t consult attorneys before issuing their position. Don’t be a fricktard.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:00 am to JudgeHolden
quote:No, this is like saying the referee confirmed one of the boxers won the first round
This is like scoring in the first quarter and calling yourself the game winner.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:01 am to Rodo
quote:Apparently, Sankey thinks it's pretty rock solid because he waived the white flag
What jurisdiction does this court have outside of Texas?
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:22 am to AU6X
quote:Actually, that analogy was pretty apt which shows just how off base everybody is on this issue
quote:
It's like your boss telling you in writing that you're allowed to take a 2-week vacation. Then you get back in town and fires you for taking the 2-week vacation, because they changed the policy while you were away.
It’s nothing like that at all.
The players were told their eligibility had expired then later changed the rule after the players had no choice but to try to make it in the pros. The courts have been consistent that the players have a legit grievance.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:25 am to Windy City
quote:That everyone has to abide by or be in contempt - essentially law
No, it is effectively a short-lived set of instructions
quote:This is exactly what Kiffin said all along and why it's so stupid that rantards have been losing their minds. This is a 1 time exception for about 4 dozen players that the NCAA left in the lurch. It's not nearly as big of a deal as the rant has made it out to be.
there is no precedent or new standard or any long term change of any kind that occurs with a TRO
Regardless, numerous judges across the country are in agreement that the players should be allowed to exercise their eligibility.
quote:It's essentially law and it's why Sankey was called as a defendant and why he has now backed down. If it weren't the same thing as "law" he wouldn't have surrendered
Stop using the term "law"
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:26 am to RoscoeSanCarlos
quote:If they did, they need to fire them and get better lawyers becasue they lost, publicly and in a humiliating fashion. They acted hastily, got slapped down and had to publicly admit defeat
You really think the SEC didn’t consult attorneys before issuing their position
Posted on 8/29/26 at 12:16 pm to somethingdifferent
You douche bags are insufferable.Lane hasn’t done anything illegal ,just going by the judges rulings.But keep up the BS you will see who has the last laugh.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 5:11 pm to RGT
quote:For stating facts? You seem really emotional about this
You douche bags are insufferable
quote:You mean facts?
But keep up the BS
quote:You might be right. These rulings might get overturned. Explain the process of how LSU would be retroactively punished for doing something a court allowed at the time. Hell, Michigan cheated their way to a NC and the NCAA did nothing.
you will see who has the last laugh
Also, what will be your reaction if most of the top 15 picks up these players?
Page 14 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News