Started By
Message
Consensus on 9 games conference schedule.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:12 am
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:12 am
It’s back and forth.
I might see a majority on this board say that we should not have done this without a huge bump in TV revenue, since we take a hit in losses.
Upvote for 9 games.
Downvote for 8 games.
Eta. Things to consider.
-Eliminate SEC cship game (probably won’t happen)
-Need two bye weeks.
-Increase revenue
-Consider SOS when committee makes playoff.
-What to do with neutral games (WLOC/RRSO)
I might see a majority on this board say that we should not have done this without a huge bump in TV revenue, since we take a hit in losses.
Upvote for 9 games.
Downvote for 8 games.
Eta. Things to consider.
-Eliminate SEC cship game (probably won’t happen)
-Need two bye weeks.
-Increase revenue
-Consider SOS when committee makes playoff.
-What to do with neutral games (WLOC/RRSO)
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 7:37 am
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:14 am to dstone12
Can we add a caveat? 9 games and eliminate conference championship games.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:14 am to dstone12
I’m for it, I just wish there was more uniformity on all conferences doing the same. I didn’t complain much before cfb became pro lite but for the money they get paid I want better gsmes across all of college fb.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:16 am to Diamondawg
quote:
Can we add a caveat? 9 games and eliminate conference championship games.
I could go for this, but this is a cash cow for the conferences.
I dont think they’d easily get rid of it.
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 7:17 am
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:18 am to dstone12
I also want to say that I would only be for a nine game conference if we had two bye weeks.
And I understand you can’t have that every year. It depends on when college football starts on the calendar, but if you’re gonna do nine games you need to bye weeks.
And I understand you can’t have that every year. It depends on when college football starts on the calendar, but if you’re gonna do nine games you need to bye weeks.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:20 am to dstone12
quote:It could potentially kick the loser to a lower ranking and miss the playoff. We need to be thinking with our brains instead of with the money might generate.
I could go for this, but this is a cash cow for the conferences.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:22 am to bamabaseballsec
quote:
I might see a majority on this board say that we should not have done this without a huge bump in TV revenue
They did increase revenue for going to 9 games.
quote:
I’m for it, I just wish there was more uniformity on all conferences doing the same.
Big10, Big12, and kinda ACC has a 9 game schedule.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:24 am to Diamondawg
quote:
We need to be thinking with our brains instead of with the money might generate.
This train left the station a long time ago.
I agree with you.
I prefer 7 or eight conferences with nine to twelve teams in each. But the money makers somehow see profit in
Rutgers @ USC
And
Stanford @ NCSU
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:26 am to dstone12
Rutgers @ USC
I wonder what this looks like in the future, not sure how much value a big market school with zero market penetration has moving forward.
I wonder what this looks like in the future, not sure how much value a big market school with zero market penetration has moving forward.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:29 am to mckibaj
quote:
They did increase revenue for going to 9 games.
Not the same TV distribution money though.
This ninth game in a top to bottom conference produces way more tv money for the networks and it is not congruent with the big10’s deal.
1. Alabama (8.49M average viewers)
2. Georgia (7.48M)
3. Tennessee (6.21M)
4. Texas (7.55M)
5. Oklahoma (6.47M)
6. LSU (6.42M)
7. Ohio State (6.57M)
8. Florida
9. . Florida Stat
10. Notre Dame
11 . Ole Miss
12. . South Carolina
13. Michigan (5.08M)
14. Vanderbilt
15 Auburn (5.26M)
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 7:31 am
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:32 am to dstone12
Awesome for fans/ticketholders to replace a cupcake with an extra big game.
Makes it much harder on teams/coaches.
Good and bad. Ask us in 5 years.
Makes it much harder on teams/coaches.
Good and bad. Ask us in 5 years.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:33 am to dstone12
No matter how hard you try, you can't take the bias out of a 9 game schedule. Half the teams in the league will have the advantage of having an extra home game.
The only solution would be everyone playing one SEC game at a neutral site like the Cocktail party. I'm not sure anyone would want that (even Uga and UF are going away from it.)
The only solution would be everyone playing one SEC game at a neutral site like the Cocktail party. I'm not sure anyone would want that (even Uga and UF are going away from it.)
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:40 am to bamabaseballsec
quote:
I’m for it, I just wish there was more uniformity on all conferences doing the same
The thing is, is there uniformity in SOS in big10’s nine games vs SEC 9games?
I don’t think there is uniformity with the big10 being too heavy.
That will cost the sec since we have harder schedules. SOS has to be in play and in fact, this was always our complaint in the 90s/00’s.
“If OSU/Michigan/ND played in the sec, they’d have more losses. “
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:59 am to dstone12
quote:
This ninth game in a top to bottom conference produces way more tv money for the networks
Agree with that statement. And from what I have seen they agreed to somewhere between 50-80 Mil for 8 more SEC games. Which trades 16 mostly lower viewership games for 8 SEC conference games. I’m sure there was a lot of research and negotiation to come up with the add in revenue.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:33 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:
(even Uga and UF are going away from it.)
I don't think this is accurate. Even with the Jacksonville stadium renovations Florida and Georgia are hosting neutral sites in Atlanta and Tampa. And will be back in Jacksonville after
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:41 am to dstone12
quote:
I might see a majority on this board say that we should not have done this without a huge bump in TV revenue, since we take a hit in losses.
The one thing HCs feel stronger about than money is wins and losses. It isn't even close.
So let me rephrase and reframe this for everyone:
How many SEC HCs are for 9 conference games if not one SEC team is going into the Playoffs with more than 2 regular-season losses?
Back to top

5









