Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Consensus on 9 games conference schedule.

Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:12 am
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
41344 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:12 am
It’s back and forth.

I might see a majority on this board say that we should not have done this without a huge bump in TV revenue, since we take a hit in losses.




Upvote for 9 games.
Downvote for 8 games.








Eta. Things to consider.
-Eliminate SEC cship game (probably won’t happen)
-Need two bye weeks.
-Increase revenue
-Consider SOS when committee makes playoff.
-What to do with neutral games (WLOC/RRSO)
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 7:37 am
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
39455 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:14 am to
Can we add a caveat? 9 games and eliminate conference championship games.
Posted by bamabaseballsec
Member since Dec 2020
4286 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:14 am to
I’m for it, I just wish there was more uniformity on all conferences doing the same. I didn’t complain much before cfb became pro lite but for the money they get paid I want better gsmes across all of college fb.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
41344 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:16 am to
quote:

Can we add a caveat? 9 games and eliminate conference championship games.


I could go for this, but this is a cash cow for the conferences.

I dont think they’d easily get rid of it.
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 7:17 am
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
41344 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:18 am to
I also want to say that I would only be for a nine game conference if we had two bye weeks.

And I understand you can’t have that every year. It depends on when college football starts on the calendar, but if you’re gonna do nine games you need to bye weeks.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
39455 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:20 am to
quote:

I could go for this, but this is a cash cow for the conferences.
It could potentially kick the loser to a lower ranking and miss the playoff. We need to be thinking with our brains instead of with the money might generate.
Posted by mckibaj
Member since Nov 2010
8480 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:22 am to
quote:

I might see a majority on this board say that we should not have done this without a huge bump in TV revenue


They did increase revenue for going to 9 games.

quote:

I’m for it, I just wish there was more uniformity on all conferences doing the same.


Big10, Big12, and kinda ACC has a 9 game schedule.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
41344 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:24 am to
quote:

We need to be thinking with our brains instead of with the money might generate.


This train left the station a long time ago.

I agree with you.


I prefer 7 or eight conferences with nine to twelve teams in each. But the money makers somehow see profit in

Rutgers @ USC
And
Stanford @ NCSU
Posted by bamabaseballsec
Member since Dec 2020
4286 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:26 am to
Rutgers @ USC

I wonder what this looks like in the future, not sure how much value a big market school with zero market penetration has moving forward.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
41344 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:29 am to
quote:

They did increase revenue for going to 9 games.


Not the same TV distribution money though.

This ninth game in a top to bottom conference produces way more tv money for the networks and it is not congruent with the big10’s deal.

1. Alabama (8.49M average viewers)
2. Georgia (7.48M)
3. Tennessee (6.21M)
4. Texas (7.55M)
5. Oklahoma (6.47M)
6. LSU (6.42M)

7. Ohio State (6.57M)
8. Florida
9. . Florida Stat
10. Notre Dame
11 . Ole Miss
12. . South Carolina

13. Michigan (5.08M)
14. Vanderbilt
15 Auburn (5.26M)

This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 7:31 am
Posted by Tarpon08
Cut Off, LA
Member since Dec 2014
8913 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:32 am to
Awesome for fans/ticketholders to replace a cupcake with an extra big game.

Makes it much harder on teams/coaches.

Good and bad. Ask us in 5 years.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
35271 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:33 am to
No matter how hard you try, you can't take the bias out of a 9 game schedule. Half the teams in the league will have the advantage of having an extra home game.

The only solution would be everyone playing one SEC game at a neutral site like the Cocktail party. I'm not sure anyone would want that (even Uga and UF are going away from it.)
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
41344 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:40 am to
quote:

I’m for it, I just wish there was more uniformity on all conferences doing the same


The thing is, is there uniformity in SOS in big10’s nine games vs SEC 9games?

I don’t think there is uniformity with the big10 being too heavy.

That will cost the sec since we have harder schedules. SOS has to be in play and in fact, this was always our complaint in the 90s/00’s.

“If OSU/Michigan/ND played in the sec, they’d have more losses. “

Posted by mckibaj
Member since Nov 2010
8480 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:59 am to
quote:

This ninth game in a top to bottom conference produces way more tv money for the networks


Agree with that statement. And from what I have seen they agreed to somewhere between 50-80 Mil for 8 more SEC games. Which trades 16 mostly lower viewership games for 8 SEC conference games. I’m sure there was a lot of research and negotiation to come up with the add in revenue.
Posted by Marcelo Lavanda
Manaus, Amazonas
Member since Oct 2024
494 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:33 am to
quote:

(even Uga and UF are going away from it.)


I don't think this is accurate. Even with the Jacksonville stadium renovations Florida and Georgia are hosting neutral sites in Atlanta and Tampa. And will be back in Jacksonville after
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
17339 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:41 am to
quote:

I might see a majority on this board say that we should not have done this without a huge bump in TV revenue, since we take a hit in losses.


The one thing HCs feel stronger about than money is wins and losses. It isn't even close.

So let me rephrase and reframe this for everyone:

How many SEC HCs are for 9 conference games if not one SEC team is going into the Playoffs with more than 2 regular-season losses?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter