Started By
Message
re: BREAKING Alabama Associate AD took 25k to steer players to Atlanta financial advisor
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:05 am to NYCAuburn
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:05 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Wrong
Which penalties are attributed to UA? Which to Davis?
quote:
Involved Penalties:
Television: 0 yrs
Reduction in Financial Aid: No
Postseason: 0 yrs
Recruiting: No
Probation: 0 yrs
Show Cause Penalty: Yes
Vacation of Record: No
LINK
1
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:05 am to SummerOfGeorge
It will get back on track eventually. They always do.
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:06 am to Eric Nies Grind Time
quote:
Eric Nies Grind Time
Maybe if you understood the context or meaning!! Grant never made a finalist for any of the top rated kids. He recruited "projects" and then tried to make them into basketball players. That was what I was implying!
Coming from the school that had Michael Sam on their team, maybe you shouldn't speak!!
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:06 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Well this thread was fun gallows humor while it lasted.
Tider04 needs his honorary Harvery sticker for the day
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:06 am to MrAUTigers
quote:
It will get back on track eventually. They always do
SHUT UP BARNER I HOPE YOU DIE RAWWWWWWW
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:06 am to SummerOfGeorge
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:07 am to NYCAuburn
If this is just about paying high profile recruits to get to come and play for a university, I don't get the big ruckus...this has been going on for decades. There has got to be something bigger than a Chuck Person getting a 60K loan/bribe through a guy that owns a haberdashery who got the money from a financial planner who got it through a guy at Adidas
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:08 am to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Which penalties are attributed to UA? Which to Davis?
maybe I misread, I thought you meant no level 1 in this case
no need for you to get caught up in the other shite stains mess
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:09 am to KiwiHead
I think the FEDS want the shoe guys. Just like with drugs, they start at the street level type. Our Pres. has said the FEDS have told him that Auburn was not the target. We just got caught up in it.
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:10 am to NYCAuburn
I was more curious than anything. I just didn't understand how they categorized these things. It would seem to me, that if the university wasn't levied with any sanctions it doesn't count towards a total.
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:10 am to MrAUTigers
quote:
Our Pres. has said the FEDS have told him that Auburn was not the target. We just got caught up in it.
I'm pretty dissapointed the REC was sloppy enough to let the FBI drag us in. There will be consequences.
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:11 am to KiwiHead
It can be a major violation even though no penalties are giving. Two of Auburn’s fit in that category.
Bama fan wants to use different rules for them, bottom line is Bama has 6 major infraction cases, Auburn 7.
Now explain 1941 while critizing other schools.
Bama fan wants to use different rules for them, bottom line is Bama has 6 major infraction cases, Auburn 7.
Now explain 1941 while critizing other schools.
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:12 am to allin2010
quote:
Bama fan wants to use different rules for them, bottom line is Bama has 6 major infraction cases, Auburn 7.
Now explain 1941 while critizing other schools.
1941 as in the championship? The frick does that have to do with any of this?
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:14 am to SummerOfGeorge
I think most schools are dumbfounded that it is the FEDS and not the NCAA.
I am sure most big time programs have turtles poking out about now.
I find it odd that they subpoenaed Nike and not UA yet.
I am sure most big time programs have turtles poking out about now.
I find it odd that they subpoenaed Nike and not UA yet.
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:16 am to MrAUTigers
So this thread turned into a Auburn/Alabama pissing contest
Who would have thought that'
Who would have thought that'
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:16 am to MrAUTigers
quote:
I find it odd that they subpoenaed Nike and not UA yet.
Nike and Adidas are the overwhelming forces in the summer circuit. I'm not sure UA has much of a presence, especially not in comparison. They may have developed some in the last few years with Steph, but for the most part Adidas and Nike would be the major targets.
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:16 am to LanierSpots
shhhhh trying to get it back on track.
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:17 am to LanierSpots
quote:
So this thread turned into a Auburn/Alabama pissing contest
Who would have thought that'
To be fair, we had a helluva run.
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:17 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Nike and Adidas are the overwhelming forces in the summer circuit.
That's very true.
ETA The AAU stuff could possibly be one way the FEDS want to go in all of this also.
This post was edited on 9/28/17 at 11:19 am
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:19 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Nike and Adidas are the overwhelming forces in the summer circuit. I'm not sure UA has much of a presence, especially not in comparison. They may have developed some in the last few years with Steph, but for the most part Adidas and Nike would be the major targets.
Yeah the only thing UA is really known for is baseball and there really isnt a problem with the money like the others from the big 3.
I have to feel Nike is the ultimate endgame for the DOJ
Page 17 of 32
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News